• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

இது எப்பிடி இருக்கு...?...tvk

Status
Not open for further replies.

kk4646

Active member
இது எப்பிடி இருக்கு...?...tvk

553051_636716483027627_2042083406_n.webp
 
That is possible when count is done at the trailing edge rather than the leading edge. (electronic circuit designers will understand). If count is updated only when you exit a page, this is possible. So, if you press reply button before exit, reply count will be updated, but not view count.

Timing and sequencing diagram is a must in design of digital circuits.


Computerji counts the replies faster than the views!

How can I reply without viewing the post?

idhu eppadi irukku? :eyebrows:
 
I feel all forms of child nudity should be banned!

Frankly speaking this is the 1st step to child pornography and will cause pedophiles to target children.

A child is below the age of consent to give permission for being photographed nude.

Adults have no right to violate a childs privacy.
 
Last edited:
I feel all forms of child nudity should be banned!

Frankly speaking this is the 1st step to child pornography and will cause pedophiles to target children.

A child is below the age of consent to give permission for being photographed nude.

Adults have no right to violate a childs privacy.


"I feel all forms of child nudity should be banned!"...


Yes.. Does it mean adult nudity is acceptable.. ?.. pornography in any form is harmful but as you know the human behavior

and attitude are 'conditioned' by the environment as well as the necessity of 'existence'..

TVK
 
"I feel all forms of child nudity should be banned!"...


Yes.. Does it mean adult nudity is acceptable.. ?.. pornography in any form is harmful but as you know the human behavior

and attitude are 'conditioned' by the environment as well as the necessity of 'existence'..

TVK

Dear TVK ji,

The key word here is CONSENT.

Just like sex is fine but rape is not.

An adult above the age of 18 years can give his or her consent for being photographed in the nude.

But a child is not having the mental maturity to give consent or even realize that he or she is being violated.

I am not talking about morals here..Porn stars who are above the age of consent can do as they please for a living.

Everyone thinks a nude child is "choooooo cheeeeeewt".

No one gives the consent of the child a thought.

I never preach about morals as morals can differ from time place and person as in conditioning......I always go by the law.

Anything that has NO Consent is Illegal.

Illegal and immoral might not always be the same.

In fact in some countries..pasting/circulating pics of child nudity is a crime.

It is always better to play safe when it comes to the law.
 
Last edited:
"But a child is not having the mental maturity to give consent or even realize that he or she is being violated."


Yes absolutely true...But then who is responsible for this kind of exploitation.. ? Is it not the grown up adult as the

'custodian'..

Even the law do not consider a child as mature enough to give consent or no consent..and always treat the

'custodian'..whether the Mother, Father or anyone who take the responsibility as the rightful person to decide for the

child.. As such we can not treat the consent or no consent of a child is illegal but at best it is an immoral thing and as as

long as 'takers' are there ..'suppliers' will be there..

TVK

P.S... Cut-down this..'ji' business.. I feel like 'fish' out of water..
 
"But a child is not having the mental maturity to give consent or even realize that he or she is being violated."


Yes absolutely true...But then who is responsible for this kind of exploitation.. ? Is it not the grown up adult as the

'custodian'..

Even the law do not consider a child as mature enough to give consent or no consent..and always treat the

'custodian'..whether the Mother, Father or anyone who take the responsibility as the rightful person to decide for the

child.. As such we can not treat the consent or no consent of a child is illegal but at best it is an immoral thing and as as

long as 'takers' are there ..'suppliers' will be there..

TVK

P.S... Cut-down this..'ji' business.. I feel like 'fish' out of water..

Oyee TVK,

You are right yaar!

So at every step there is exploitation..here is the list of the various steps.

1)Parents of the children for allowing the children to be photographed without clothes.

2)The Photographer

3)The person who uploaded it on the website

4)The person who posted the pic in forum

5)and the rest of us in Forum who are viewing this pic.

BTW why are you so allergic to to the word Ji?

Its culture agriculture of your land yaar..
 
Last edited:
Oyee TVK,

You are right yaar!

So at every step there is exploitation..here is the list of the various steps.

1)Parents of the children for allowing the children to be photographed without clothes.

2)The Photographer

3)The person who uploaded it on the website

4)The person who posted the pic in forum

5)and the rest of us in Forum who are viewing this pic.

BTW why are you so allergic to to the word Ji?

Its culture agriculture of your land yaar..


"and the rest of us in Forum who are viewing this pic."


And how about the people who posting their comments..? ..You have exempted them [ including you & me]..

'JI' ..if it is agriculture it will be productive.. but it is weed.. must be removed from the land..


TVK
 
"and the rest of us in Forum who are viewing this pic."


And how about the people who posting their comments..? ..You have exempted them [ including you & me]..

'JI' ..if it is agriculture it will be productive.. but it is weed.. must be removed from the land..


TVK

Encik TVK,

When I wrote those viewing it..I meant everyone including us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top