• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

BJP adamant on Hindu CM for JK

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why not a Hindu CM for J & K..Hope the competing parties see merit in this..After all BJP has been breaking the shackles of caste and region in various states starting with Maharashtra, Haryana & Jharkhand!

Exclusive! BJP adamant on Hindu CM for JK


Last updated on: December 30, 2014

A PDP-BJP alliance would have been formed on the evening of December 28 had the BJP agreed to let Mufti Mohammad Sayeed become chief minister for the first three years and allow the BJP to nominate its chief minister for the next three years.

Sheela Bhatt/Rediff.com has the exclusive report.
A week after the election results in Jammu and Kashmir were announced, the delay in forming a government is due to the Bharatiya Janata Party's demand to lead a coalition government first.


The hung assembly result has thrown up the slim opportunity to have the first Hindu chief minister in Jammu and Kashmir, India's only Muslim majority state, right away.
The largest single party in the 87-member assembly is the Peoples Democratic Party led by Mufti Mohammed Sayeed with 28 seats.


The BJP, which won 25 seats (all in Jammu and none in the Kashmir valley or Ladakh) claims it has the support of another 6 elected members.


The Congress party has 12 seats while the National Conference has 15 seats.


The PDP, National Conference and Congress are vertically divided over the BJP's demand that one of its Hindu leaders -- which could well be someone who has not been elected in the assembly election -- from Jammu lead a coalition government.


There is talk that elected members of the National Conference and PDP will rebel against their respective leaderships if their leaders form an alliance with the BJP and accept the BJP's demand for a Hindu chief minister.


Other reports suggest that members of these regional parties and even the Congress party could break away and help the BJP attain its dream of a Hindu chief minister.


Leaders like the PDP's Mufti Mohammad Sayeed and the National Conference's Omar Abdullah privately argue that there is tremendous pressure on their parties inside the Kashmir valley not to allow a Hindu chief minister under any circumstances.
The BJP is bargaining on its strength of 31 seats. A PDP-BJP alliance would have been formed on the evening of December 28 had the BJP agreed to let Mufti Mohammad Sayeed become chief minister for the first three years and allow the BJP to nominate its chief minister for the next three years.


Unlike other states in the Indian Union with five-year terms for their legislatures, the Jammu and Kashmir assembly has a six-year term.


But the BJP has been adamant to have the first chance to lead such a coalition; it would prefer that Mufti Mohammad Sayeed be the chief minister between 2018 and 2020.


BJP leaders feel after three years the regional party could succumb to pressure and not honour the agreement of a split chief ministership between the allies.


Clearly, the BJP is in bargaining mode.


The regional parties are worried about their future if they accept the BJP's demand for a non-Kashmiri Muslim from Jammu to lead the Muslim-majority state.


Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP President Amit Shah are monitoring the developing situation from New Delhi while Ram Madhav, who planned the party's election campaign in the state, is camping in Jammu.
Mufti Mohammad Sayeed, a leader who is too experienced not to understand the BJP game, reportedly, told one BJP leader, 'If I accept your demand to have your man lead the government in Srinagar I will not be able to face the people in the valley.' The BJP leader responded, 'If I accept your demand, I won't be able to face people in the rest of India.'
The BJP leadership is patient and weighing all its options carefully. Given the stakes in the troubled Kashmir valley, they are treading carefully.


Without the BJP's help, the PDP will need to reach out to its bitter adversary, the National Conference. Even if that unlikely situation materialises, the PDP-National Conference alliance will be one short of a majority in the assembly.


How such a government will govern even if it survives is the question. This makes the BJP's position strong and demand something that is unthinkable and unacceptable to politicians in the Kashmir valley.


BJP leaders are fully aware of the odds it confronts, but the December 23 electoral veridct has given it an opportunity to try and create history.

http://www.rediff.com/news/special/exclusive-bjp-adamant-on-hindu-cm-for-jk/20141230.htm
 
I think J&K will go the Delhi way only . Best for BJP is to sit in Oppositin and allow the others to break their head in forming a Government and use that time to build more trust and confidence with the Valley People and expose how that various parties that rules J&K have spoilt the valley and what BJP can do to set right the situation so that next time when there is an election BJP will come with a full majority on their own and will also win or at least to well in the Valley and Ladakh .
 
Last edited:
A PDP-BJP alliance would have been formed on the evening of December 28 had the BJP agreed to let Mufti Mohammad Sayeed become chief minister for the first three years and allow the BJP to nominate its chief minister for the next three years.

BJP must not repeat the folly of giving in 'rotation cm'; it was cheated by mayawati and kumaraswamy, who withdrew support after serving first half term.
 
BJP must not repeat the folly of giving in 'rotation cm'; it was cheated by mayawati and kumaraswamy, who withdrew support after serving first half term.
Yes that is why I am saying that best is for BJP is to remain in Opposition and build its base more in J&K and also devleop more trust with the Valley voters .Any combination of Government is only a post poll alliance and will not last long unless one party gives in fully to the other party . A Delhi like situation is emerging and no Government will last long and best is for BJP to show that they are not power hungry and rather focus on increasing their strength in all parts of the J&K ( especially in Valley and Ladakh ) for the next elections .
 
Yes that is why I am saying that best is for BJP is to remain in Opposition and build its base more in J&K and also devleop more trust with the Valley voters .Any combination of Government is only a post poll alliance and will not last long unless one party gives in fully to the other party . A Delhi like situation is emerging and no Government will last long and best is for BJP to show that they are not power hungry and rather focus on increasing their strength in all parts of the J&K ( especially in Valley and Ladakh ) for the next elections .
hi

yes...this is correct....but now ...i feel ..after winning sometimes...bjp also adamant and want power in J and K.....but any

govt will not survive for full term....like delhi....finally president rule is ONLY option in future....different idealogies never go

together...
 
BJP has got 1% vote share in the Kashmir Region. Except one candidate, the remaining lost deposits.

BJP was successful only in Jammu Region.

BJP can allow either PDP or NC to form Govt., get the Dy. CM Post and consolidate further in Jammu Region and, if possible, get a foot hold in Kashmir with positive approach.

Otherwise, the best option is opposition bench.
 
In Kerala Christians are just under 25%..But they are part of the ruling clan & have their CM's...Why cannot a Hindu become a CM in a Muslim majority J & K..While the former (Christian CM) is secular the latter (Hindu CM) is communal..Strange!
 
In Kerala Christians are just under 25%..But they are part of the ruling clan & have their CM's...Why cannot a Hindu become a CM in a Muslim majority J & K..While the former (Christian CM) is secular the latter (Hindu CM) is communal..Strange!

Kerala is not like J&K.

Hindus, Muslims and Buddhists are majority in Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh (or Leh) respectively.

In Kerala, apart from Christians, Muslims comprise 17-18% and both put together comes to more than 40%. This is the reason why every alternate Govt. in Kerala is from Congress and a Christian leading the Govt. Most of the Hindus are with Left. BJP is unable to bring unity among various Hindu communities in Kerala and is still waiting to win even a single seat.

This may be the feature of other Indian States also in future, unless something is done to stop it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top