Naina_Marbus
Active member
Some time back, there was a thread labeled "India: a tryst with destiny"
That thread is closed. I think we should start anew:
For a start, read this article:
http://www.theguardian.com/global/2014/may/18/india-narendra-modi-election-destiny
16 May2014, must go down in history as the day when Britain finally left India. Narendra Modi's victory in the elections marks the end of a long era in which the structures of power did not differ greatly from those through which Britain ruled India. India under the Congress party was in many ways a continuation of the British Raj by other means.
The India till today was centralized, garrisoned, culturally constricted, and ruled by a relatively small elite whose attitude toward the masses was alternately benevolent and exploitative but never inclusive. Universal suffrage gave Indiansa vote but not, at least for much of the time, a voice. When that voice was occasionally heard, as it was in 1977 in the elections that followed the disastrously unpopular Emergency declared by Indira Gandhi, there could be a sudden sense of its almost volcanic capacity to remake the political landscape, but such moments were rare.
Now that voice has been heard again. It has endorsed a new kind of leader in the shape of Mr Modi. He is from the lower castes. He is not a natural English speaker.
- continued below
http://www.theguardian.com/global/2014/may/18/india-narendra-modi-election-destiny
That thread is closed. I think we should start anew:
For a start, read this article:
http://www.theguardian.com/global/2014/may/18/india-narendra-modi-election-destiny
16 May2014, must go down in history as the day when Britain finally left India. Narendra Modi's victory in the elections marks the end of a long era in which the structures of power did not differ greatly from those through which Britain ruled India. India under the Congress party was in many ways a continuation of the British Raj by other means.
The India till today was centralized, garrisoned, culturally constricted, and ruled by a relatively small elite whose attitude toward the masses was alternately benevolent and exploitative but never inclusive. Universal suffrage gave Indiansa vote but not, at least for much of the time, a voice. When that voice was occasionally heard, as it was in 1977 in the elections that followed the disastrously unpopular Emergency declared by Indira Gandhi, there could be a sudden sense of its almost volcanic capacity to remake the political landscape, but such moments were rare.
Now that voice has been heard again. It has endorsed a new kind of leader in the shape of Mr Modi. He is from the lower castes. He is not a natural English speaker.
- continued below
http://www.theguardian.com/global/2014/may/18/india-narendra-modi-election-destiny
Last edited: