• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Is it ‘fashionable’ to make one-sided movies?

Status
Not open for further replies.
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]A documentary must show both sides, but a fictional movie can distort truth and vilify one side, as is done in PK.[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Documentary: Textures of Loss[/FONT]

"The documentary features interviews of people who lost their kin because of the conflict and violence in Kashmir. Some of them condemned the country and the Army, while others spoke about jihad.


"On Monday, a bench of Justices Vikramjit Sen and C Nagappan asked, “Why is it one-sided? Where is the alternate picture? We don’t know why it has become fashionable and a question of human rights to talk about one side of a story. Rights are always conferred on two parties and not only on one of them… this is what is happening with activists.”

“If you have not taken the view of the other side, then it becomes the views of the producer or director. It is not the people’s view as you want to project it. Which people are you talking about when you haven’t spoken to others? When a filmmaker goes on to show only his point of view, it remains his view,” said the bench. “Criticising one view and exalting others… or if not exalting, understanding one view and not even trying to understand others may not be right. You cannot have a one-sided view of a story,” it added.

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/sc-asks-kashmir-documentary-filmmaker-is-it-fashionable-to-make-one-sided-movies/

 
One sides situations are not alien to us humans.

History was written by the victor ..even the great epics like Ramayan and Mahabharat are written from the point of view of the Victor... technically a one sided a view!

Our Puranas are also one sided and only the victors story is heard.

No one heard Ravan's version....no one heard the Kauravas version or the version of the Asuras.

So what is True and what is False?

We do NOT really know.

So the best is just read anything or watch a movie purely as a witness and do not take sides.

It is we humans who still want to be that bird that sits on the tree and jumps from branch to branch eating fruits.

No one wants to be the other bird that silently watches and does not eat fruits.

Our Upanishads are neutral and always hints on being a witness rather than an active participant but sadly we get carried away by epics and Puranas and launch a Yuddh!
 
Last edited:
It is not possible to write about every side of any issue. If you have to write or produce a movie showing every side of any issue it would the entire wikipedia + some more billion views.

It is impractical. The views are not constant either, We all have changed our views over period of time. So there is nothing static about views, but writings or movies are some specific opinion at any given time.

So, is a one-sided documentary not permitted by our constitution ? There are newspapers run by political parties - are they not one-sided ? There are websites, blogs, FB pages, tweets, etc which are one sided and propagandist - are also to be questioned henceforth ?
 
One sides situations are not alien to us humans.

History was written by the victor ..even the great epics like Ramayan and Mahabharat are written from the point of view of the Victor... technically a one sided a view!

I disagree. Ramayana and Mahabharata are not written to 'side' with the victor. Rather, they show, how on earth, even pure good will be made to suffer and prove its might on its own accord, and how in the end, after all the hardship, truth will triumph! (To boost of the morale of the readers).
 
I disagree. Ramayana and Mahabharata are not written to 'side' with the victor. Rather, they show, how on earth, even pure good will be made to suffer and prove its might on its own accord, and how in the end, after all the hardship, truth will triumph! (To boost of the morale of the readers).

I agree only with the last sentence given in parenthesis..... that it boosts the morale of the readers. Other things are a lot more iffy.

I also have a question on Ramayana for which I could not find an answer. Did Hanuman return the Sanjeevini parvatham to its original place? Is there any mention of it in any version of Ramayanam?
 
I agree only with the last sentence given in parenthesis..... that it boosts the morale of the readers. Other things are a lot more iffy.

I also have a question on Ramayana for which I could not find an answer. Did Hanuman return the Sanjeevini parvatham to its original place? Is there any mention of it in any version of Ramayanam?

No, Hanuman did not return the Sanjeevani parvatham to its original place. As he carried it while flying, a piece of it broke down and some say it fell down on earth to form the 'Ardhagiri' mountains in AP. Some others say this piece formed the Western ghats... And I think the other half is still in Sri Lanka... but not sure about this.
 
I disagree. Ramayana and Mahabharata are not written to 'side' with the victor. Rather, they show, how on earth, even pure good will be made to suffer and prove its might on its own accord, and how in the end, after all the hardship, truth will triumph! (To boost of the morale of the readers).


I agree with you from your point of view and beg to differ from my point of view....but taking into consideration the other point of view which is neither my point of view nor your point of view....we never got to hear their story.

So the best is always just be a neutral observer and imbibe what we feel will be beneficial for our mindset. There is no harm admiring the qualities of Ravan or the Kauravas after all Ravan is technically a Vaishnava since he is Jaya the Vaikuntha Dwara Pala.

At the end of the day any epic where so called good triumphs over so called evil will sound like Rajini's Punch Dialogue in Basha to boost the moral of the spectators!LOL


"Nallavangala Aandavan Sothipaan, Kai Vida Maatan...
Ketavangaluku Aandavan Niraya Kodupaan, Aana Kai Vituduvaan"
Basha daa... Maanic Bashaa
 
Last edited:
I disagree. Ramayana and Mahabharata are not written to 'side' with the victor. Rather, they show, how on earth, even pure good will be made to suffer and prove its might on its own accord, and how in the end, after all the hardship, truth will triumph! (To boost of the morale of the readers).

I think this could also be Modi's victory speech. But the question is: is Modi Rama or Ravana. Are we able to write Modiyana now or will have to let history be the judge to find out who is the hero and who is the villain. Surely only one account will survive.
 
No, Hanuman did not return the Sanjeevani parvatham to its original place. As he carried it while flying, a piece of it broke down and some say it fell down on earth to form the 'Ardhagiri' mountains in AP. Some others say this piece formed the Western ghats... And I think the other half is still in Sri Lanka... but not sure about this.

Hmm, that's kind of sad, isn't it? Otherwise everybody in India could have been immortal.
 
I think this could also be Modi's victory speech. But the question is: is Modi Rama or Ravana. Are we able to write Modiyana now or will have to let history be the judge to find out who is the hero and who is the villain. Surely only one account will survive.

Modi is Rama.

He is Eka Patni Vrata and does not stay with her.He gave her up to lead the nation.
 
Hope Obama does not read this and starts riding a horse! :)

r-NRSC-OBAMA-2012-AD-large570.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top