• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Kalpathi Ganapati Subramanyan- An artist who broke down boundaries

Status
Not open for further replies.
RIP-K.G.Subramanyan

An artist who broke down boundaries

[TD="class: articleheader"][/TD]

[TD="class: story, align: left"]
nat1.jpg
KG Subramanyan

The path-breaking and protean artist savant, Kalpati Ganapati Subramanyan, who died in Vadodara at the age of 92 on Wednesday afternoon, had embraced world culture, but his aesthetic sensibility was rooted in traditions as he made no distinction between classical Indian art and the country's folk culture.
He inspired great admiration that almost bordered on reverence, yet at heart he was a no-nonsense man with a sly sense of humour that was irreverent at times.
"Manida" or "KG", as he was popularly known, came of age as an artist at Kala Bhavan in Santiniketan and was very close to Benode Behari Mukherjee and Ramkinkar Baij. Yet, when he left Santiniketan and shifted to Vadodara in the winter of his life, he did not spare the "ashram" that Rabindranath had established, describing it as "a carnival site for affluent people in Calcutta".

KG was born in 1924 at Mahe, a French colony on the west coast of Kerala, but was arrested and banned from further education for participating in the Quit India Movement. However he was acquainted with modern European masters and had seen reproductions of the works of Nandalal Bose and Tagore. Sculptor Debi Prosad Roy Chowdhury was impressed by some of his works, and he steered his career from politics to art as he joined Santiniketan.
As he embarked on his professional career as an artist, KG experimented in myriad forms like terracotta murals, reverse glass painting, enamel painting, toymaking, and weaving. He made toys with wood and leather, rather unusual for our country. One of his most significant murals was based on Tagore's play, King of the Dark Chamber . KG's mural was a visual transcription and free restructuring of the episodes of the play.
When it came to terracotta, Subramanyan allowed the medium to speak its tongue. He created organic images which he creased and folded with clay, and he often used tablets of clay to tell stories.
KG was an exceptionally gifted writer and had produced several books and treatises on aesthetics that reflected his deep understanding of Indian culture and vast learning. He was a brilliant writer of stories and rhymes for children which he often illustrated. He believed that children did not need lollipops, and there were often dark shades in what he wrote for them.
In his reverse glass paintings he transformed sensuous images of his terracottas into glittering bazaar icons gilded with gold. He drew upon the beauties of Kalighat patas to create seductresses often accompanied by their pets. His wit sparkled in these works. His career having spanned several decades, it saw several radical transformations. His ideas, style, and materials used, everything underwent gradual but radical changes.
His art was a celebration of his voracious appetite for all influences both foreign and indigenous. Picasso, patachitras , bazaar prints, African masks and Tanjore paintings appear and make comebacks with renewed vigour, every time in a new avatar.
There was a strong decorative element in all of KG's compositions, but he did not use this for mere embellishment. They gave an ironic edge to his work just in the same way that deities and fantastic creatures do when they make an appearance in otherwise realistic situations, blurring the line between the real and irreal. If we examine his career, Subramanyan was always breaking down boundaries that we erect between the folk and the hieratic, between global cultures and geographical confines.
KG was a highly skilled draughtsman and anatomy was his strong point. So each part of the body would have the freedom of moving independently like a puppet, the talpatar sepai still sold in Santiniketan. So his drawings were both facile and have an inherent decorative element. Even when he distorted his figures, they did not violate the rules of construction.
KG Subramanyan was a Padma Vibhushan. He was invited to exhibit his works at documenta, the major exhibition of contemporary art at Kassel in Germany next year.


[/TD]
 
Last edited:
[h=1]Teacher, storyteller, iconoclast[/h]





  • The Hindu Archives
    K.G. Subramanyam's ‘Woman Before Mirror’.
  • 03SM_SUBRAMANYAN_2917386g.jpg



K.G. Subramanyan was 92 when he passed away this week, after a magnificent innings lived and shaped with fierce energy, drawing in his wake some of the country's greatest modern artists
For some, he was the greatest of teachers. For others, he was the doyen of modern Indian artists forever breaking out of fixed categories and emerging moth-like from multiple cocoons. To some, he was a storyteller re-inventing old myths but cladding them in new forms. Often, he could be disturbing, as he poked at the ant hills of convention with his painterly brush and unearthed the termites of hidden lusts lurking within. But one thing that made K.G. Subramanyan the great spirit he was, through his long life of 92 years, was that he always remained an artist; tending the creative force within and nurturing those who came in touch with him.
To those associated with him during the most creative period of his early life, when he fled to Santiniketan (1944-50) and had that moment of revelation when he met the guardians of Tagore’s vision, Nandalal Bose and Ramkinker Baij, at Kala Bhavan, the arts department of Visva-Bharati University, he was always Mani da, an honorary Bengali. For those who met him in later life, swathed in multiple layers of raw silk and cotton in muted colours, he was an apt representative of that austerely elegant school initiated by the Tagorean ethos.
Only some sources mention that Subramanyan’s early influences were those of his native place, Mayyazhi, or Mahe (as it was known in North Malabar), a French protectorate. North Malabar is famous for its living performance traditions of sacred dances, where the dancers, all men, paint their faces and adorn themselves with fantastical costumes made from palm fronds and sheaths, turning into supernatural beings. Some of Subramanyan’s paintings of luridly painted faces and women with exaggerated appendages bring to mind these terrifying manifestations.
There is also a very keen element of making fun of authority that is seen in Kerala that may be observed in Subramanyan’s often pointed caricatures of human interactions, particularly between men and women in moments of erotic congress. In these, he emerges as a ‘trickster’, a bahurupi who changes form continually to both entertain and enrage viewers. The artist here wields the brush like a missile, to taunt society.
Nothing is quite as it seems. It’s this enigmatic quality between the surface of his calm, almost placid, palette of colours sometimes carefully coordinated like those of a fashion designer, and their desire to provoke, that makes Subramanyan’s work full of surprises. Equally, of course, they reflect his close observation of images from contemporary cinema, advertisements and life, as he recorded them in all their curious anecdotage. To him, the great epic dramas tended to be repeated in the events that unfolded around him in everyday life.
Or, as he observed in response to questions about the recurrence of certain motifs in his work, whether painting on wood, glass, paper or a wall, or sculpting sectioned portraits in terracotta like the storied facades of temples in parts of West Bengal; whether illustrator or toy-maker: “We have our own little obsessions. And they may be continuous. But not enough to become a goal. At least a grand, steady goal. Really speaking, I don’t want any more goals and challenges. If the little things I see around excite me and link up into stories of a king, that is good enough.” (Quoted in The Flamed Mosaic by Neville Tuli.)
Long before Santiniketan, Subramanyan had enrolled at Presidency College, Madras, and taken part in the freedom movement as an ardent follower of Gandhi and been jailed for a short while. In the early 60s, he spent some time in New Delhi, both teaching and learning; he had his first brush with Baroda, which would become his second and, later, his spiritual home for two decades (1951-55 and 1961-80); he learnt the nuances of emerging art trends of the mid-20th century at the Slade School in London (1955-56); and worked at Weavers’ Service Centre in Bombay (1957-61).
A great teacher is known by the quality of those who come after him. In Subramanyan’s case, the period in which he lived and worked in Baroda created the ferment in the contemporary Indian art scene, with the dominance of the Baroda School, which produced many greats. Many of these artists have emerged as the conscience-keepers of their generation. In that garden of light and shadows, there can only be one king. Long may K.G. Subramanyan’s aura continue to glow.
Geeta Doctor is a Chennai-based writer and critic.

http://www.thehindu.com/features/ma...e-to-artist-kg-subramanyan/article8801062.ece

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top