Miracle At Gandhi Maidan

[Brahmanyan]

Share:

Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Share Link

This is a forwarded mail that I got recently.

"Character doesn’t develop in a crisis, it reveals it." says the Article in "Mediacrooks" an internet portal
on "Indian Media Watch.... Changing The Way You Consume News..." while describing how Indian Media
simply refused to see a miracle that just happened LIVE in Shri Narendra Modi's Hunkaar Rally held
at Gandhi Maidan, on October,27,2013 at Patna."Awesome truth is that Narendra Modi and the BJP leaders demonstrated extraordinary skill and presence of mind. Their own lives were in danger. They demonstrated extraordinary “Calm under fire”. Such calm doesn’t come from weak leaders and pretenders."

Please read the full Article in the following weblink:

MediaCrooks: Hunkaar Rally

 

[sravna]

Very well said. Calm under fire is the real test of talent. If your brain can work under extreme pressure calmly, it can't do better. I have always thought Narendra Modi handles pressure very well and can be a very good leader of the country.

 

[Nara]

Calm under fire, on 9/11, George W Bush:

George Bush on September 11th - YouTube

Character revealed ......

 

[Brahmanyan]

Narendra Modi ended the speech by requesting calm and peace, he did not try to use the incident for gaining votes. Here is an account of the ground report of the incident written by the reporter of Firstpost who had covered the incident:

"It was only after Modi had finished his speech and gave his Vande matram chants that we got an inkling that all was not well. “No one should be harmed while you return. You must exercise restraint and caution so that no one is harmed. We are peace loving people and peace must be maintained at all cost”, he said."

Read more at: http://www.firstpost.com/politics/p...-i-saw-it-1197229.html?utm_source=ref_article

 

[sangom]

This is a forwarded mail that I got recently.

"Character doesn’t develop in a crisis, it reveals it." says the Article in "Mediacrooks" an internet portal
on "Indian Media Watch.... Changing The Way You Consume News..." while describing how Indian Media
simply refused to see a miracle that just happened LIVE in Shri Narendra Modi's Hunkaar Rally held
at Gandhi Maidan, on October,27,2013 at Patna."Awesome truth is that Narendra Modi and the BJP leaders demonstrated extraordinary skill and presence of mind. Their own lives were in danger. They demonstrated extraordinary “Calm under fire”. Such calm doesn’t come from weak leaders and pretenders."

Please read the full Article in the following weblink:

MediaCrooks: Hunkaar Rally

Since the normal tendency of humans in such situations will be quite different and since it has now been advertised that "Narendra Modi and the BJP leaders demonstrated extraordinary skill and presence of mind. Their own lives were in danger. They demonstrated extraordinary “Calm under fire”. Such calm doesn’t come from weak leaders and pretenders.", I get a doubt whether the whole episode was a genuine one or pre-planned and staged so as to claim such "great and extra-ordinary leadership'. We should also bear in mind that one of the mischief-makers is dead and perhaps he was the king-pin.

If my thinking ultimately proves true, then it was not a miracle.

 

[prasad1]

There are no miracles ever, it is only an occurrence for which we do not have full explanation.
In political arena miracles are staged and managed events.

 

[renuka]

I wonder how many saw the Tamil movie KO staring Jeeva,Ajmal Ameer.

Ko (film) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When it comes to politics and politicians I do not believe anything.

 

[Nara]

Desperation, anything to divert attention from either rank incompetence or criminal mass murder. The real miracle will be, if they get away with it ......

 

[sravna]

Desperation, anything to divert attention from either rank incompetence or criminal mass murder. The real miracle will be, if they get away with it ......

Dear Shri Nara,

If it is rank incompetence and criminal behavior as you say, Modi wouldn't have been convincingly voted to power the third time. It is his opponents who portray such a bad image of Modi.

In fact it is Congress which is desperate to cover up its rank incompetence and corruption.

 

[renuka]

Dear Sravna,

Politics is the worst game in the world..In fact sometimes we can never trust the one with the best performance.

Only a cool calculated person with hidden agenda can be a successful politician in a 3rd world country..and in a 3rd world country..only those who have a hidden agenda join the field of politics.

 

[sravna]

Dear Sravna,

Politics is the worst game in the world..In fact sometimes we can never trust the one with the best performance.

Only a cool calculated person with hidden agenda can be a successful politician in a 3rd world country..and in a 3rd world country..only those who have a hidden agenda join the field of politics.

Dear Renuka,

I Agree. But I think Modi is a better option than Rahul Gandhi and co. Unlike Rahul Gandhi , Modi has the capability to take his own decisions, and his governance at Gujarat says he can deliver results.

Politics in developed nations is different in the sense the politicians there cannot take their own country for a ride and so take the less developed countries for a ride.

 

[sravna]

Very importantly I think Modi will not be a sycophant of foreign powers such as the U.S. and that I think is necessary if India is to choose its own path.

 

[renuka]

Dear Renuka,

I Agree. But I think Modi is a better option than Rahul Gandhi and co. Unlike Rahul Gandhi , Modi has the capability to take his own decisions, and his governance at Gujarat says he can deliver results.

Politics in developed nations is different in the sense the politicians there cannot take their own country for a ride and so take the less developed countries for a ride.

Dear Sravna,

At the beginning every politician tries to 'act' good to impress everyone in order to get votes.

Once they are in full control they show their true colors.

That is why I have never ever voted in my life out here in my country cos I feel at the end of the day all politicians will be the same.

So if you ask me I feel Rahul or Modi wont make a difference finally.

If both are going to be the same eventually..Rahul will make a better choice cos at least he is kind of cute!LOL

 

[sravna]

Dear Renuka,

I think in the present world where the developed nations especially the U.S.. trying to influence the running of the other countries like India, it is necessary that India has a leader that resists such influences. I am sure Rahul and Co. cannot do it. Modi is capable and also his estrangement with the U.S. is a blessing in disguise.

Taking care of the welfare of the country is a lot less difficult and any one with a reasonable sincerity can achieve good results which I think Modi will.

 

[Brahmanyan]

Dear Renuka,

I think in the present world where the developed nations especially the U.S.. trying to influence the running of the other countries like India, it is necessary that India has a leader that resists such influences. I am sure Rahul and Co. cannot do it. Modi is capable and also his estrangement with the U.S. is a blessing in disguise.
Taking care of the welfare of the country is a lot less difficult and any one with a reasonable sincerity can achieve good results which I think Modi will.

Dear Sri Srinivasan V,

It is an fact, after the exit of USSR, US is the dominating Power in the world of today.Only China has defeated their domination by capturing shrewedly the business interests of US. If we look at the History of nations, we will find it is always the Business interests of a Country dominated Politics. East India Company came to India to do simple business of selling their products, ultimately ruled India for about 300 years. Taking care of welfare of a Country is incidental to business interests. Modi or Rahul will not be exception to this rule. But the difference between the two will be the Leadership qualites.Modi is matured over the years of experience in running a Government. He is a Leader by his own merits. He knows how to handle the bureaucracy. But the young VP of Congress is proppedup by the self seeking coterie has to depend on others even for his speeches. His speeches expose that the youngster has to learn a lot about India and the Indians.

Running a Country like India which has problems in "multi" , multi Racial, Lingusitic, Religious, Castes, etc etc is like "walking on racer's edge". If we do not have a person with leadership qualities to head the Government we will continue to suffer for ever.

It is my personal opinion, our Country suffers from lack of leaders to unite us. There is no united India, but we have group of States, ruled by regional satraps, now try to establish their hereditary rule. Our Economy is in complete shables, corruption has spread into the capillaries of governance. Our Currency has lost its value in international finance. Prices of essentials have breached laws of gravity. The Goverment under a Text book economic expert has failed completely in all sectors of Governance. People want a change, they wait for the first opportunity to show their anger converting into votes to change the Government. People have accepted Narendra Modi, but has BJP is ready to change in tune with the aspirations of the people? Only 2014 results will reveal this.

Regards,

 

[sravna]

Dear Shri Brahmanyan,

I agree with you that we need a true leader to make India progress. As you say one of the important qualities of a leader is maturity. When you possess maturity a number of desirable qualities follow. You do not yield to pressure, you are able to think objectively, you are able to attract and inspire people, you see the big picture and so on. In addition the experience that one has as a leader gives the person the chance to understand his job in detail and hence add to his effectiveness as a leader.

On all the above counts Modi has a good edge over Rahul who in my opinion has neither the characteristics nor the experience to lead the country.

 

[sangom]

Very importantly I think Modi will not be a sycophant of foreign powers such as the U.S. and that I think is necessary if India is to choose its own path.

Dear Sravna,

To my limited knowledge, information and feedback from people living in Gujarat, NaMo may not be a sycophant of foreign powers but he definitely is a sycophant or even worse of all capitalists - both Indian and foreign, foreign being welcome even to Chidu!

What has happened in Gujarat, overall, is that it has become a heavenly haven for the so-called middle classes (so-called, because the entry point is constantly changing, and if you get in today, may be tomorrow you will get thrown out of this middle-class club since the average income as a condition for admission to this hallowed group, is steadily increasing.) Once you get thrown out of that merry bandwagon, your existence is no better than the BPL in Jharkhand or any other backward state. We or the world does not get to see the "unshowable" face of gujarat and the people of India are being taken for the second biggest trick, the first place, of course, always taken by religion.

My own gut feeling is that this grand magic will succeed to some extent but the BJP won't get a majority to rule; whether it will honourably sit in the opposition, is doubtful since BJP is no different than Congress when it comes to tasting the sweet taste of political power. So, we will see yet another hotch-potch coalition which will continue merrily to loot the people and the country!!

 

[sravna]

Dear Sravna,

To my limited knowledge, information and feedback from people living in Gujarat, NaMo may not be a sycophant of foreign powers but he definitely is a sycophant or even worse of all capitalists - both Indian and foreign, foreign being welcome even to Chidu!

What has happened in Gujarat, overall, is that it has become a heavenly haven for the so-called middle classes (so-called, because the entry point is constantly changing, and if you get in today, may be tomorrow you will get thrown out of this middle-class club since the average income as a condition for admission to this hallowed group, is steadily increasing.) Once you get thrown out of that merry bandwagon, your existence is no better than the BPL in Jharkhand or any other backward state. We or the world does not get to see the "unshowable" face of gujarat and the people of India are being taken for the second biggest trick, the first place, of course, always taken by religion.

My own gut feeling is that this grand magic will succeed to some extent but the BJP won't get a majority to rule; whether it will honourably sit in the opposition, is doubtful since BJP is no different than Congress when it comes to tasting the sweet taste of political power. So, we will see yet another hotch-potch coalition which will continue merrily to loot the people and the country!!

Dear Shri Sangom,

My views are based on the fact that we have the choose from the options available and given the options available, Modi is the best choice. I prefer to look at the more fundamental factors to assess a person such as his character than on his actual past actions. Modi may be a sycophant of all capitalists but I think he has the ability to see the right from the wrong and learn to do the right and take his own decisions. Rahul unfortunately is not like that. Who would want a prime minister for whom others think?

Certain gimmicks are needed because you have to attract people but I think there is also substance in Modi and I would say the very fact that a country like the U.S. sidelines him speaks eloquently for him though in an ironic way.

 

[vgane]

At this crucial juncture, BJP has not got a better leader than NaMo who knows the pulse of the people..

NaMo is honest and forthright...He does not have any family luggage and coterie to be taken care!

He will do good for the country!

He will call a spade a spade..

NaMo will not tolerate any nonsense..

Overall NaMo will improve the Governance..

He will strive to provide better administration! Take responsibility for his cabinet and be accountable compared to his predecessors in Government!

 

[C RAVI]

Dear Sravna,

To my limited knowledge, information and feedback from people living in Gujarat, NaMo may not be a sycophant of foreign powers but he definitely is a sycophant or even worse of all capitalists - both Indian and foreign, foreign being welcome even to Chidu!

What has happened in Gujarat, overall, is that it has become a heavenly haven for the so-called middle classes (so-called, because the entry point is constantly changing, and if you get in today, may be tomorrow you will get thrown out of this middle-class club since the average income as a condition for admission to this hallowed group, is steadily increasing.) Once you get thrown out of that merry bandwagon, your existence is no better than the BPL in Jharkhand or any other backward state. We or the world does not get to see the "unshowable" face of gujarat and the people of India are being taken for the second biggest trick, the first place, of course, always taken by religion.

My own gut feeling is that this grand magic will succeed to some extent but the BJP won't get a majority to rule; whether it will honourably sit in the opposition, is doubtful since BJP is no different than Congress when it comes to tasting the sweet taste of political power. So, we will see yet another hotch-potch coalition which will continue merrily to loot the people and the country!!

Shri Sangom,

Would just like to know if you wish Modi to come to power with a majority to form the Government and rule the nation and not the Congress OR you are only highlighting BJP's and Namo's both positive and negative impact on India irrespective of BJP's total majority or coalition government in your above post?

I am asking you this, considering your post in another thread, couple of days before., post no.11 here - http://www.tamilbrahmins.com/genera...e-india-than-elsewhere-french-minister-2.html

Smt. Renuka,

I hold that "aping the west" is the root cause of many evils in the present day Indian society, including the lack of safety for women. My diagnosis is an enlightened Indian Jihadi rule which will remove all the undesirable west-aping from India. Most probably if NaMo becomes PM something like what I recommend may come into existence.

 

[sangom]

Shri Sangom,

Would just like to know if you wish Modi to come to power with a majority to form the Government and rule the nation and not the Congress OR you are only highlighting BJP's and Namo's both positive and negative impact on India irrespective of BJP's total majority or coalition government in your above post?

I am asking you this, considering your post in another thread, couple of days before., post no.11 here - http://www.tamilbrahmins.com/genera...e-india-than-elsewhere-french-minister-2.html


[/B][/U]

Dear Shri Ravi,

Thank you very much for asking the question. My position is somewhat 'vague' or 'undecided', if I may say so. Still, I will give my preferences (from the best to least desirable) as under:—

1. (Best) Modi becomes PM in a BJP majority government (even excluding its allies Shiv Sena, SAD, Subramaniam Swamy etc.,) changes his political view from the hard core hindutva to an "all-inclusive" approach and rules with his administrative efficiency as demonstrated by him in Gujarat, working throughout this vast country. (I feel this is no more than a day dream because many of these wishes may not happen. Most importantly, I have my own misgivings about how far Modi will prove to be an all-India leader as capable as, say, his own idol Sardar Patel.)

2. Modi becomes PM of a coalition govt. at the centre. (This will perhaps not last long, given the style of working of Modi.)

3. There will be a coalition in which BJP is there, but due to the arithmatic of numbers, Modi withdraws and some one else - like JJ, NP, Mulayam, Maayaavati - becomes PM. This will be yet another experiment but the results are unlikely to be much different from UPA's.

The problem, to my mind, is that BJP's/Modi's acceptance by people is not based on Modi being a genuine All-India leader nor BJP as an all-inclusive and truly secular party. In their last and only tenure, BJP proved themselves to be worse than Congress and that led to UPA. I feel we cannot expect any lasting successes from BJP or Modi rule except some "hindutva - oriented" hullabaloo which will only mean noise and no worthwhile action for improving the state of affairs of the country.

 

[C RAVI]

Dear Shri Ravi,

Thank you very much for asking the question. My position is somewhat 'vague' or 'undecided', if I may say so. Still, I will give my preferences (from the best to least desirable) as under:—

1. (Best) Modi becomes PM in a BJP majority government (even excluding its allies Shiv Sena, SAD, Subramaniam Swamy etc.,) changes his political view from the hard core hindutva to an "all-inclusive" approach and rules with his administrative efficiency as demonstrated by him in Gujarat, working throughout this vast country. (I feel this is no more than a day dream because many of these wishes may not happen. Most importantly, I have my own misgivings about how far Modi will prove to be an all-India leader as capable as, say, his own idol Sardar Patel.)

2. Modi becomes PM of a coalition govt. at the centre. (This will perhaps not last long, given the style of working of Modi.)

3. There will be a coalition in which BJP is there, but due to the arithmatic of numbers, Modi withdraws and some one else - like JJ, NP, Mulayam, Maayaavati - becomes PM. This will be yet another experiment but the results are unlikely to be much different from UPA's.

The problem, to my mind, is that BJP's/Modi's acceptance by people is not based on Modi being a genuine All-India leader nor BJP as an all-inclusive and truly secular party. In their last and only tenure, BJP proved themselves to be worse than Congress and that led to UPA. I feel we cannot expect any lasting successes from BJP or Modi rule except some "hindutva - oriented" hullabaloo which will only mean noise and no worthwhile action for improving the state of affairs of the country.

Shri Sangom,

Thank you for your detailed reply, giving your total analysis, considering the Indian political scenario and ethics of our politicians. And, yes, I agree with all that you have mentioned.

But, still, I have some hopes that, BJP's independent governance in full majority under Modi's leadership would do much much better.

 

[sarang]

Primary meaning of "miracle" is 'Any amazing or wonderful occurrence'.

What happened in Gandhi Maidan is a miracle.

1. Even though the first blast at the railway station happened at 9:30 in the morning, and a few more at other places in the forenoon, people in large numbers, several lakhs collected at the maidan to see and hear Sri Modi.

2. The huge crowd did wait till Modi finished his speech, despite more blasts, smoke and sound, and did not panic.

3. It is not correct to say that people in the ground and those coming to the ground were not aware of the blasts. Such bad news travels fast.

4. Modi concluded his speech with a request for the audience to disperse safely, not to get into violence. The crowd followed his advice to the letter and dispersed peacefully, without a single instance of crushing and angry duels which happens in any crowd.

5. Despite the threat to life and safety with bombs exploding, death and injuries nearby, there was no stampede or mad rushing out. A simple non existent rumour of fire made several passengers jump out of a train in andhra to be crushed by the train in the parallel line.

so what happened is a miracle. When something happens when it is least expected, like 'I passed the exam when I was sure to fail' or Narendra modi and BJP winning with a comfortable majority (without need for coalition) despite ganging up of pseudo secular and unholy elements is (will be) a miracle. IM, congress and nitish kumar were expecting chaos and confusion and cancellation of the rally, but the rally was a resounding success. Now nitish says that the rally was a success because of the blasts; he has forgotten the crowd that collected despite the morning blasts.

It is not necessary that a miracle involves a supernatural act.

 

[auh]

I agree with # 23. Blasts happening minus the stampede of panic and fear is no mean feat !

I don't buy the argument that this must have all been staged... of course it is a possibility, but the aftermath is too risky and a party of such stature (BJP) would think a hundred times over before doing something as silly as planting a bomb in their own meetings.

I too share the sentiment that BJP may not have an absolute majority in the next elections. The vote base is far too divided for that to happen, but if it does, then that might be the best thing that happened in indian politics since begging our independence from the british.

 

[prasad1]

Primary meaning of "miracle" is 'Any amazing or wonderful occurrence'.

What happened in Gandhi Maidan is a miracle.

1. Even though the first blast at the railway station happened at 9:30 in the morning, and a few more at other places in the forenoon, people in large numbers, several lakhs collected at the maidan to see and hear Sri Modi.

2. The huge crowd did wait till Modi finished his speech, despite more blasts, smoke and sound, and did not panic.

3. It is not correct to say that people in the ground and those coming to the ground were not aware of the blasts. Such bad news travels fast.

4. Modi concluded his speech with a request for the audience to disperse safely, not to get into violence. The crowd followed his advice to the letter and dispersed peacefully, without a single instance of crushing and angry duels which happens in any crowd.

5. Despite the threat to life and safety with bombs exploding, death and injuries nearby, there was no stampede or mad rushing out. A simple non existent rumour of fire made several passengers jump out of a train in andhra to be crushed by the train in the parallel line.

so what happened is a miracle. When something happens when it is least expected, like 'I passed the exam when I was sure to fail' or Narendra modi and BJP winning with a comfortable majority (without need for coalition) despite ganging up of pseudo secular and unholy elements is (will be) a miracle. IM, congress and nitish kumar were expecting chaos and confusion and cancellation of the rally, but the rally was a resounding success. Now nitish says that the rally was a success because of the blasts; he has forgotten the crowd that collected despite the morning blasts.

It is not necessary that a miracle involves a supernatural act.

It is your strong suit "plagiarizing", comes naturally to you.
The true definition
mir·a·cle noun \ˈmir-i-kəl\
: an unusual or wonderful event that is believed to be caused by the power of God


: a very amazing or unusual event, thing, or achievement
Full Definition of MIRACLE


1
: an extraordinary event manifesting divine intervention in human affairs
2
: an extremely outstanding or unusual event, thing, or accomplishment
3
Christian Science : a divinely natural phenomenon experienced humanly as the fulfillment of spiritual law

Miracle - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary