• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Only PM, President, Chief Justics can feature in Government Ads as per SC

Status
Not open for further replies.
Good guidance! Otherwise we will be staring at pictures of the Honorable Chairperson of the UPA & all regional satraps!
[h=1]Only PM, President, Chief Justice Can Feature in Government Ads, Says Supreme Court[/h]
Reported by A Vaidyanathan, Edited by Amit Chaturvedi (With inputs from agencies) | Updated: May 13, 2015

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has banned the use of photos of any politicians other than the Prime Minister in print ads placed by the government. The top court allowed the use of images of the President and the Chief Justice of India, but said, "Even these three personalities will have to approve whether their photos will be there."

The verdict applies to the frequent ads that are placed by the centre and state governments to publicise schemes.

"Photos have the potential of developing personality cult," said the top court, exempting photos of deceased leaders from its new rules.

Today's ruling means that Chief Ministers and Governors cannot feature in government ads. The top court has also appointed a committee of three members to ensure that the new guidelines are not violated. "Advertisement materials should be objective and not directed at promoting political interests of ruling party," the judges said.

In February, the Centre had argued in court that the Supreme Court should not interfere with how the government communicates with the public. It also said that the court was in danger of "pre-censorship".

Today's verdict was based on petitions filed by NGOs including one headed by lawyer-activist Prashant Bhushan, seeking rules to protect taxpayer's money from being spent on gaining political mileage.

In recent years, acting on Mr Bhushan's petition, the Supreme Court has cautioned the government to curb excessive spending on publicising its schemes as well as glorifying political leaders with ads placed to mark their birth and death anniversaries.

In February, however, Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi argued, "These are matters which should be left to the government and are outside the purview of the courts. The government communicates to the public at large through these advertisements on policy and other matters," the Attorney General said, adding that all expenses of the Centre are accounted for with the national auditor CAG.

Only PM, President, Chief Justice Can Feature in Government Ads, Says Supreme Court
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top