Dear Sri drsundaram,
My comments stand on their own merit, as you elicited opinion. These are my personal views, not as a moderator.
By the way, what do you mean by "Moderator always think, by virtue of their ethnic identity may be, to sharply comment on any thing which are not going well with theirs" What do you imply by 'ethnic identity'? Are you implying I am not a TB? Are you implying that if I disagree with your views, I can not comment? I would like you to clarify this.
I fail to understand your comments here and above regarding my comments. You have said "Caustic comments like "Taliban" etc are unworthy and they do not deserve to be in this decently transpiring forum' May I ask you how this is a 'caustic' comment? 'Talibanization' is a very commonly used word today to describe some religious/cultural edict. "We are not Taliban' is not to be in anyways derogatory to you but to comment on your specific sentence "Hope valued members will agree to switch to Sri, Chi, Sow, Smt or Avargal, etc etc.". Sorry Sri drsundaram, your sentence seems to me to be a subtle pressure put on the members to switch. I apologize if my comments hurt you, but believe me, they were not meant to be hurtful.
Again, you say that saying 'Ji' is 'distasteful or rather not comfortable with at all times'. I still do not understand why it is 'distasteful'? Seems to me that perhaps you were trying to say that the word does not convey a sense of togetherness and seems very formal. If this is the case, then I agree. But that is not what you said. You have described the word as 'distasteful'. You have every right to say so. And it is also my right to express my opinion about using that term.
As I have said, we have members from all parts of India, as well as other countries. So, when you express an opinion that seems applicable to a narrow sliver of a language or custom, then please be prepared to get opinions on it.
Nothing personal.
Regards,
KRS