• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Say no GM Foods

Status
Not open for further replies.
Modiji wants India to accept GM foods. According to some health tips, GM foods are not good for health. They have created more diseases, and 40% American populations suffer because of GM foods. There were some agitations in AP recently. Modiji has given another slogan "Make in India". Modiji can very well focus on higher productivity and better quality goods as against GM foods. Tap talents available in the VAST country and embark on real developments instead of marketing for others. By the way, decades before the government had a programe of indigenization. How far "Make in India" is different from that one.
The first step will be to stop "land acquisition". Suppose if we go for GM foods, let anybody take anybody's lands. Jai Hind.
 
Modiji wants India to accept GM foods. According to some health tips, GM foods are not good for health. They have created more diseases, and 40% American populations suffer because of GM foods. There were some agitations in AP recently. Modiji has given another slogan "Make in India". Modiji can very well focus on higher productivity and better quality goods as against GM foods. Tap talents available in the VAST country and embark on real developments instead of marketing for others. By the way, decades before the government had a programe of indigenization. How far "Make in India" is different from that one.
The first step will be to stop "land acquisition". Suppose if we go for GM foods, let anybody take anybody's lands. Jai Hind.
Since I’m not aware of any solid data on long-term effects of genetically modified foods in humans, I prefer to be cautious.

On Land acquisition bill I am worried that the poor will suffer. This is precisely why all of India’s rights-based legislations — the right to work, the right to food, the right to education, and the right to information represent a huge achievement for Indian democracy. They symbolize the triumph of politics over blind monetarism. And today, they form the legislative edifice on which the social and economic aspirations of a vast majority of Indians rest.
But the Modi dispensation — like the one that preceded it — is also under pressure to kowtow to the dogma of fiscal rectitude. Yet fiscal discipline is not the only agenda behind the savage spending cuts in its very first year. The aim is also to prepare the ground for fundamentally altering the default settings of social welfare in India — from a rights-based one that honours the dignity of the poor, to a paternalistic one that will push thousands more of the landless poor into a debt trap, depress rural wages, and make them ever more dependant on government charity, and at the brutal mercy of the unorganised labour market.
 
Last edited:
I am not against GMO, but we may not have any choice.
Bill Nye (The Science Guy Bill Nye - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)
"GMOs are not inherently bad," he told host Josh Zepps. "We are able to feed 7.2 billion people, which a century and a half ago you could barely feed 1 and a half billion people and [it's] largely because of the success of modern farming."

But Nye urged caution, particularly because introducing new organisms into the ecosystem can have "unintended consequences."
"My take on it now is genetically modified food is actually, in general, -- genetically modified plants, in general, -- are not only not harmful, they're actually a great benefit. However, you can't just go planting enormous monocultures and killing everything and expect the ecosystems to take it," he said.
By introducing herbicide and pesticide in the plant genetics, instead of spraying on the plant we have healthy plants. It also reduces the cost of food productions.
Bill Nye Explains Why He Changed His Mind About GMOs







 
Last edited:
Every major international science body in the world has reviewed multiple independent studies—in some cases numbering in the hundreds—in coming to the consensus conclusion that GMO crops are as safe or safer than conventional or organic foods. But until now, the magnitude of the research on crop biotechnology has never been cataloged. In response to what they believed was an information gap, a team of Italian scientists summarized 1783 studies about the safety and environmental impacts of GMO foods—a staggering number.
The researchers couldn’t find a single credible example demonstrating that GM foods pose any harm to humans or animals. “The scientific research conducted so far has not detected any significant hazards directly connected with the use of genetically engineered crops,” the scientists concluded.
The research review, published in Critical Reviews in Biotechnology in September, spanned only the last decade—from 2002 to 2012—which represents only about a third of the lifetime of GM technology.
2000+ Reasons Why GMOs Are Safe To Eat And Environmentally Sustainable - Forbes


The gene that is inserted into Monstato's GM wheat makes it resistant to the herbicide Roundup Ready, Sneller said. This same gene has been inserted into GM corn, soybeans and cotton, Sneller said. At least 95 percent of GM soybeans contain this gene, "and they're exported around the world, and there's no health problems at all," Sneller said.

When Monsanto was considering GM wheat, the company consulted with the FDA, and the agency said it had no concerns about the products' safety, Smith said.
.........................................

Numerous scientific studies show that genetically modified crops are safe to eat, Jaffe said.

Americans have been eating GM corn since 1995, and there have been no reports of ill health effects. "We are the big guinea pig, and we're doing fine," Sneller said.

But it is possible to create a GM food that is unsafe -- for instance, researchers could insert a gene that allowed the plant to produce an allergen, or a protein to which some people are allergic.

"We have to consider things on a case-by-case basis, and be vigilant about each new use of genetic engineering," Smith said.

But if the crop seed is GMO, how do we know the grain we buy in store is GMO or non-GMO?
If the yield from a particular seed is better and it happens to be a GMO, the farmer is tempted to plant these seed. At that point do we have a choice?


ww.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/06/gmo-wheat-safe-genetically-modified-_n_3397180.html
 
Last edited:
With the renewed interest and zeal for organic and nature foods, many will opt out of GM food and cultivation. Farmers and consumers have the freedom of choice to bing GM food or not. GM food brings its own disadvantages - monopoly, farmer forced to buy seeds from MNC, strict growing practices, warning indication on the product (like cigarette packs).

The govt has initiated action to support financially and technically, development of native breeds of livestock and plant varieties including grains and vegetables. GM food will lose its perceived advantage in a short time.

In a different note, gujjus are good at trading. So modi will make india a good seller than buyer. No need to worry.

40% American populations suffer because of GM foods

Our american friends here think differently!

programe of indigenization. How far "Make in India" is different from that one.

Our understanding of indigenization was substituting imported parts with indian parts after collaboration or technology transfer; make in india is manufacture in india for global market. Big difference.
 
Any research study - on GM or medicines - will depend on who sponsors the study. Anyway there will be lot of interesting debate.
 
Indigenization helped small industries to come up and a good number of them have graduated to unit makers. "Make In India" sounds like we cannot make whole units and hence you are welcome to make it from India. In the long run the indigenization helped India but "make in India" may end like TATA's efforts to make "Nano" from WB. Of course, India will not be as badly affected as in the times of "PL-480". I think it is time India contributed to world's development instead of kowtowing to others. It is unfortunate that our developments are compared with that of China. It is a trap and India will do well to shun that lure. Consumer market cannot be ignored; but consumerism cannot feed our people and it might starve them. Modi should direct Indian scientists to improve organic foods, find alternative energy form and so many and so forth. America has found India has brains and let us tap them for our benefit and for the benefit of the world. That should be direction. Suddenly nobody talks about India becoming a super power. It is vested in us but being wrested from us by trade communities.
 
Swadeshi jagran manch! Vivekanada international foundation, a public policy think tank has supplied ideas, policies and people for the govt.

Indigenization helped small industries to come up and a good number of them have graduated to unit makers. "Make In India" sounds like we cannot make whole units and hence you are welcome to make it from India. In the long run the indigenization helped India but "make in India" may end like TATA's efforts to make "Nano" from WB. Of course, India will not be as badly affected as in the times of "PL-480". I think it is time India contributed to world's development instead of kowtowing to others. It is unfortunate that our developments are compared with that of China. It is a trap and India will do well to shun that lure. Consumer market cannot be ignored; but consumerism cannot feed our people and it might starve them. Modi should direct Indian scientists to improve organic foods, find alternative energy form and so many and so forth. America has found India has brains and let us tap them for our benefit and for the benefit of the world. That should be direction. Suddenly nobody talks about India becoming a super power. It is vested in us but being wrested from us by trade communities.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top