jambu,
there are two ways of looking at this.
one from a historical perspective. even the current day atheists, muslims, xtians et al, if they have a tamil heritage, i think, should view the temple gopuram as a unique tamil culture contribution to art.
the structure design , though thousands of years old, is still part and parcel of a thriving current day tamil hinduism. it is the same as the pyramids of egypt, which is uniquely pre islamic egyptian origin. i think every egyptian barring the jihadists (who i think will blow these away like the afghani buddhas) is proud of that pharaoic heritage.
in the eyes, of fanatic christians, muslims, i can understand that the temple there is a symbol of hinduism, which they might find objectionable. replace it with a squat figure of an imagined resemblance to our revered sage, is but taking representation to another level - the muslims do not like depiction of humans. the xtians might find valluvar, sans the desert robe, headgear and staff, find him unbiblical.
these are political winds, and they will blow. it is important that we as a community do not take this to heart, and look upon it as a reflection of our even more alienation from the tamil tribes. it is best that our attitude be, 'if others do not care, so be it. let us move on'.
i understand that this post is neither consoling or rallying to a cause. it is penned with more a focus on reality. hopefully when MK passes on, sanity will be restored.. i see both stalin much a stable and level headed person, if it should so happen, that he climbs into the அரியாசனம்.
thank you.