• Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Sixty-two people have the same amount of wealth as half the world, says Oxfam

Status
Not open for further replies.
Globally the gap between the top 1% ultra rich & the rest has widened in the last 5 years...Sad state of affairs...How much are they devoting to philanthropy..Except for Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerburg the rest would be offering a paltry sum, I guess

Sixty-two people have the same amount of wealth as half the world, says Oxfam

January 18, 2016 - 6:03AM

Esther Han




Just 62 people own as much wealth as the poorer half of the global population, a new report reveals, as the widening of the gap between the rich and poor accelerates.
As the business elite converge on Davos for the World Economic Forum, an Oxfam report shows wealth is becoming further concentrated, with the number of people owning the same amount as the bottom half of humanity falling from 388 to 62 in five years.
It says a "broken" economic model underpinned by deregulation, privatisation and financial secrecy has seen the wealth of the richest 62 people jump by 44 per cent in five years to $1.76 trillion.
1453094888212.jpg


The richest 1 per cent now have more wealth than the rest of the world. Photo: Bloomberg

In that time, the wealth of the poorest 3.6 billion people plunged by 41 per cent.

"The big winners in our global economy are those at the top. Our economic system is heavily skewed in their favour. Far from trickling down, income and wealth are instead being sucked upwards at an alarming rate," the report said.
Oxfam acknowledged that efforts to tackle inequality had seen the halving of the number of people living below the extreme poverty line between 1990 and 2010.
1453094888212.jpg


Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and Larry Ellison are among the 62 people who own the same as half the world.

​"Yet had inequality within countries not grown during that period, an extra 200 million people would have escaped poverty. That could have risen to 700 million had poor people benefited more than the rich from economic growth," it said.
Oxfam said the growing problem of tax avoidance and use of tax havens was a prime example of how the economic system was "rigged" in the rich's favour and must be stopped.
It is also calling for workers to be paid a living wage rather than the minimum, for the end of the gender pay gap, for the influence of the powerful with vested interests to be kept in check, and for the tax burden to be shifted away from labour and consumption and towards wealth and capital.
1453094888212.jpg


The wealth of the 3.6 billion poorest people fell by just over a trillion dollars.

Since the turn of the century, the world's bottom half has received 1 per cent of the total increase in global wealth, while half of that increase has gone to the top 1 per cent, it also said.
For those comfortably living in Australia, it referred to a Credit Suisse study that revealed the richest 1 per cent now have more than the rest of the world. This occurred a year earlier than predicted.
So much of the world remains relatively poor that it has taken a net worth of just $4400 in 2015 to be counted among the wealthiest half of all world citizens, the study found.
Oxfam Australia's chief executive Helen Szoke​ said Australia was "dragging its feet" when it came to stamping out tax dodging.
billone.jpg

"Australian multinational companies, and those that operate here, should be required to publish their profits and taxes paid in every country in which they operate," she said.
"Action to recover the missing billions lost to tax havens needs to be accompanied by a commitment by governments to invest in healthcare, schools and other vital public services that make such a big difference to the lives of the poorest people."
A senate inquiry into corporate tax avoidance is due to deliver its report at the end of February. Tax Office data showed some tech companies such as Apple and Google are paying little or no tax in Australia.
The three richest men in the world – software mogul Bill Gates, Mexican telecom magnate Carlos Slim Helu and investor WarrenBuffett – have a combined net worth of $230 billion, according to Forbes.
billtwo.jpg

In China, the richest 1 per cent of households own one-third of the country's wealth, while the bottom 25 per cent account for only 1 per cent, a new report by Peking University researchers showed.
And in Britain, new data revealed growing house prices has led to the top 10 per cent now owning nearly half of the country's total private wealth.
The International Monetary Fund last year warned the gap between rich and poor in advanced economies was now at its highest level in decades, making widening income inequality the "defining challenge of our time" and suggesting "the benefits do not trickle down".​
 
It only shows that 99% of the world is not competent to become wealthy.

Many of the really rich are self made.

Let us not grudge them their wealth.

we need to realise how small we really are wealth wise.
 
It only shows that 99% of the world is not competent to become wealthy.

Many of the really rich are self made.

Let us not grudge them their wealth.

we need to realise how small we really are wealth wise.

No grudge! But without the support of the remaining other 99.99999916% they would not have been successful! If they realize this, philanthropy will come automatically!
 
In case I am not wrong, most of them do a lot of charity work and a major portion of their earnings goes to charity.
 
It shows pure Capitalism divides the society vertically between haves and have-nots.
 
Why begging bowl?

“If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich"

John. F. Kennedy


Yes, time and again has it not been proved that you cannot have an island of prosperity in a sea of poverty!
 
Yes, time and again has it not been proved that you cannot have an island of prosperity in a sea of poverty!
Thats what the poor would like to believe.

Many poor buy lottery tickets to go to island of prosperity.

Wealth goes to those who have enterprise , talent , risk taking ability and a bit of luck.

Only others can believe in God that a windfall from Him will give them wealth
 
It is poverty that drives human to prosperity pursuing their dream with iron will and hard work.

If one look into the past history of present day millionaires, one can find them that such people would have tasted poverty in their younger days. This is history.

Only few believe in luck, fortune, etc

Others accomplish to higher level in proportion to the attempts they make.
 
Only fools work themselves.

One requires wisdom to make others work for us and make one rich.

Poor who work hard [mostly physical] remain at the bottom of the wealth pyramid.

Similarly those who realise fast that multiple attempts are waste of time emerge winners.

It requires decent brains and a pot of luck to do well in life.

Or one might end up as copy cats and copy others posts or cut paste others opinions.
 


Only filtered idiots will advise against individuals having goals, ambitions and dreams

One requires wisdom to realize and bring in the desired change in attitude and approach.

Rich who work hard [mostly physical] don’t remain at the top of the wealth pyramid all the time. It is a cycle. Have not we seen rise and fall of great people?

Similarly those who realise fast that multiple attempts are waste of time emerge as mostly losers.

It requires maturity and wisdom and a burning urge to do well in life.

Or one might end up shooting blabbering untiringly, despairing and grumbling about the mess around us and shoot texts which act make no sense and prove waste of time to all others as well.

What matters is sense in whatever we do seriously.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Once one is rich by normal standards, one can only become richer by doing nothing and maintaining status quo.

Idle rich by idling become richer.

Money multiplies on its own.

Richer one is faster in growing,

Never rock a rich mans boat.

The man who rocks the rich mans boat sinks.

Rich becomes richer in the bargain.
 
Last edited:
A befitting counter drafted in same style of language has more impact for some.

Once one is rich by normal standards, he cannot become richer by doing nothing, then it will become very difficult to maintain the status quo unless one concentrates on retaining the hard earned wealth.

Idle rich by an idling mind will end of up only in bankruptcy.

Money certainly won’t multiply on its own unless one pushes it hardly with more and more concerted efforts.

Richer one who is more faster in growing will also end up in more faster in fall out. Haste makes waste.

Never rock a hard workers boat.

The man who rocks the hard worker’s boat will miserably sink at last.

Rich do becomes bankrupt in the ultimate bargain in real life.
 
The point I was making is that the rich need to do nothing drastic to maintain status quo growth rate to become richer while the poor have to work hard to catch up .

If poor try to take on the rich and try to compete with them ,they will get hurt and fall apart.

It requires very little to sink the poor.

Always respect the rich and live on their charity if you are poor.

Their charity many times is more than what the poor can make in a lifetime.For that the poor have to appease the rich with their labour.

Even govts give money to the rich industrialists and call it business promotion.

When they default nothing happens and it becomes non performing asset of a govt arm-banks

Govts give money to the poor in small amounts and call it subsidy or interest free loan . They are penalised for not returning and sent to jail for not returning the

money.

Rate the person what you are taking on before trying to compete.

There are more poor committing suicides than the rich.

How many rich bankrupt people you know in india ?
 
Last edited:
I am talking about india .

India does not even have an even comprehensive bankruptcy law covering companies

A bill that is just introduced in parliament requires seven major amendments in seven other laws including income tax act besides considering dozens of amendments.

It is like the GST.

This bill introduced in parliament is likely to go a standing committee and will not see light of day for several months if not years

In fact even if a company is debt ridden it cannot even be closed in 180 days.

It is known that most companies fudge their balance sheets.

Only the extent varies.

Even the banks in public sector were not fully disclosing their NPAs and dressing up their results.

Only recently Raghuram rajan moved in forcing them to declare them openly in next quarter results.

Now if this is the extent of rot in the financial system , who will declare or admit bankruptcy?

Have you heard of any businessman in india who is rich who has committed suicide due to financial losses ?

In Farming community every year during drought months , hundreds commit suicide when crop fails.

Micro and other finance companies lend money at exorbitant rates.

Equally miserable is the state of landless labour.

where is the comparison between and the poor?
 

It is happening every now and then.

Just look around. A typical case has been reported under your very nose.

Try to accept the facts.



"Delhi businessman commits suicide



New Delhi: A 52-year-old debt-ridden businessman committed suicide here Thursday evening by shooting himself in the head at his residence, police said.


Raminder Singh alias Pappi, an auto financier, shot himself in east Delhi`s Geeta Colonyaround 5 p.m. His body has been sent for post-mortem.

"A suicide note was recovered from Singh`s possession in which he mentioned that he was unable to pay off his heavy debts which he incurred from some banks and some money lenders," said a police officer.

Singh did not blame anyone for his suicide, added the officer.

Preliminary inquiries revealed that he was under debt since two-and-half years and was unable to pay off the loans due to his weak financial condition.

Source: http://zeenews.india.com/news/delhi/delhi-businessman-commits-suicide_826209.html


P.S: Now don't say that he is not in the list of top ten Businessmen of India.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


India saw 7 bankruptcy suicides a day last year

Number of suicides due to financial distress rose 13.6 per cent compared to 2012

The chances of a person being shot to death in India are less than half the chances of him/her committing suicide due to financial distress.

According to an analysis of data from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), last year, 1,203 people died on account of firearms in India, translating into three such deaths a day. In the case of suicides on account of bankruptcy and changes in economic status, the number stood at 2,678, or seven a day.

The number of suicides due to bankruptcy rose 13.6 per cent compared to 2012, when 2,357 such cases were reported. The share of such suicides to overall suicides, however, remained constant — two out of every 100 suicides were on account of financial distress, the same as in the previous year.

Read more at: http://www.business-standard.com/ar...-suicides-a-day-last-year-114070201025_1.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[h=1]Entrepreneurial suicides - what about them?[/h]Powered by tradeindia.com

Incidents of farmers' suicides were hogging the front pages of newspapers and prime time of news channels. The government was rolling the red carpet to solve their problems...and why not? However without a insolvency & bankruptcy regime in India there is a rise in cases of suicides of businessmen mainly from the micro, small and medium enterprise (MSME) sector.

Now the question is: Is the government doing enough? The fact that there is no way a businessman or an entrepreneur can exit declaring insolvency & bankruptcy in India however doesn't speak too highly of the initiatives taken by the authorities in this regard.

From the pages of corporate history the issue of "Entrepreneurial Suicide" is always one of the biggest challenge to MSMEs in India.


Read more at: http://india.smetoolkit.org/india/en/content/en/42707/Entrepreneurial-suicides-what-about-them-







 
Last edited by a moderator:
Financial distress is across the nation.

Thats mainly because of transition to open economy.

Some happen to be small petty business men.

Thee is no money in manufacturing as the country is open to flooding of foreign products available at a fraction of cost of indian produced product.

Money is only in trading if all and in speculation.

Even seniors are in distress due to minor pensions they receive.Only they may not commit suicide .

Small business men taking the extreme step has not become an issue since about 3000 in a population of 130 odd crores does not count for much.

If you are a bad professional in any field you are bound to be a loser

Many business types are poor either in finance or marketing.

It is only an individual effort.

Some take to business as making a mark by getting educated is not a priority in their family.\

Property dealers, auto financiers are dime a dozen in delhi.

They live on their wits and squeeeze those who go to them for services.

Most of them are shady in dealings and score high on criminality and fraud.

Many end up getting caught in murder and suicide cases
 



In your post No.14 you said that Poor who work hard[mostly physical] remain at the bottom of the wealth pyramid.

Now in your post No.22 you say that it is only anindividual effort.

What is your point? Ultimately what are you for?

Have you not read the inspirational stories of great men who rose from rags to riches?

Just go through the following link:

15 Inspirational Rags-To-Riches Stories


http://www.businessinsider.com/rags-to-riches-stories-2011-11?IR=T

Also go through the stories of rise and fall of Millionaires and Billionaires (There are lot like Vijay Mallya)

There are lot who were declared bankrupt.

And there are lot who met with financial distress and committed suicide.

If you have got anything valid to suuort your point please contribute.

Love to have a meaningful debate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The point I am making is if one has to succeed in business, one should not be alone in any enterprise.

One should team up with someone else with complementory capabilities.

One should have family or someone else to fall back on.

Like some men launch IT ecommerce with wives sticking to regular jobs covering security aspects

Whatever one does , one should weigh the risks and take a path which is optimal.

Take auto financing.

These financiers borrow from private lenders at high rates of interest to finance small timers lower/lower middle class at still higher rate of interest. Many loans go

sticky since , these debtors are daily wage earners. More often than not it ends up in fights and violence and police cases.This no one can call decent business.

On the other hand you take many of intermediate castes in truck transport business in erode and other places nearby. They hang together with relatives taking money

from them for financing purchase of trucks and do a lucrative business of transporting goods all over india.This is decent business with team work.They do very well.

I am all for the poor and not so well off.

If they have a streak of enterprise, I would back them to the hilt to float any enterprise.

In life one does not do well by hard work alone. One has to join a team and be a team player first to get some finance and develop insight into any business or trade.

If one picks up enough to venture alone then only one should try it.

If anyone rich is available doing any business ,best hang on to him to learn the ropes besides getting his blessings.

The rich might throw some oppurtunities to the not so well off to set up his business.

I know many who did well in india with support from the well off businessmen who patronised them



In business if one has to do well , ones circle and contacts should be strong enough to take risks and do well.

Without risk and enterprise there is no business.

How much of it one has to take depends on his appetite and financial muscle and contacts.
 
Last edited:
[h=1]In your postingNo.2 you have observed that many of the really rich are self made.[/h][h=1]And now your point in Posting No.24 is that, if one has to succeed inbusiness, one should not be alone in any enterprise.[/h][h=1]Now what do you mean by self-made?[/h][h=1]And what do you mean by your statement thatif one has to succeed in business, one should not be alone in any enterprise, one should team up with someone else with complementarycapabilities and should have family or someone else to fallback on.[/h][h=1]It does look contradictory?[/h][h=1]Why do your opinion swings to every post?[/h]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Latest ads

Back
Top