Why do you say unconnected statements in most of your replies & some of your posts?
What are you referring to & to whom are you directing such replies to?
Why don't you reply to specific posts to specific people who had posted replies or questions to your replies/posts?
It truly is very difficult for a small & slow mind like mine to follow your line of thought, ideas, concepts & arguments put forth as there is no proper flow in your replies. It's all over the place in the few sentences you pen; haphazard actually.
It's like you say one thing & decide to add something else to it after every few minutes like an afterthought. Reminds me of "kids" when they blurt out their naive thoughts in a random fashion. That's why I've respectfully requested you to think it through carefully before putting your words to paper, so to speak. I don't think as a life coach professional you want to come across muddled or incoherent to your disciples.
"அவர் சிக்கலான மற்றும் பெரிய வார்த்தைகளைப் பயன்படுத்துகிறார், எனவே அவர் நமக்கு தெரியாத ஒன்றை அறிந்திருக்க வேண்டும்."
With what I've read through with many of your posts, replies & answers, I don't think I will ever recommend your services to anyone I know because of the lack of coherence & well-structured lesson plans. Thoughts relayed are only effective if people can understand you. That's why one can be a good student but a terrible teacher who sounds complicated most of the time.
Have you heard the phrase, "catch no ball"? After reading, sometimes, I don't even know what you're saying or the point you're trying to make. It's a sad state of events knowing you're have superior spiritual knowledge & limited in the expression of it to be effective to the reader/listener. You do understand the simple words I'm using to get my message across to you about your style of writing, don't you?
With the atrocious delay in getting our replies approved (sometimes over a couple of days) by the moderator (no offense meant because he may have a day job that feeds him), the flow of a proper discussion's essence is lost many a time. Continuity is the crux in any discussion or debate. Imagine, you say one thing now & I reply to it immediately to counter its validity & it gets approved 48 hours or more later. What's the point of even bothering to reply to a reply?
Mr Moderator, Sir, I also note that the senior members replies' get approved sooner than for others who reply/post. I guess it may be one of the "perks" for having reached the level of a "senior member". Seniority doesn't mean their posts are always right nor factually/conceptually accurate. So, consider reviewing your posting & moderation approval criteria again for the sake of the fluidity & continuity of this forum where great minds of the senior members interact with simple & slow minds like me.
Thank you for reading!
