• Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply to thread

Yes, they are equivalent for sure. But they are not same.


I wrote it as " The day (yad ahar) one is devoid of energy/incapable (vi-rajet) (in any asrama), that day (tad ahar) can adopt saMnyAsa (pravrajet). This is a fair exception to the asrama dharma which otherwise proceeds sequentially.


It can also be written as " The day (yad ahar) one is devoid of rajo guna (vi-rajet) (in any asrama), that day (tad ahar) can adopt saMnyAsa (pravrajet)


I chose the first option. The reason is  saMnyAsa is not giving up rajas alone. It is also giving up tamas. So the day one become vi-rajet (if it is about guna) that day person can't adopt saMnyAsa.


But yes, this kind of interpretation has been used to justify people getting to saMnyAsa directly from other asramas in later days.


-TBT


Back
Top