sangom
0
To all members,
Shri Praveen has closed the previous thread titled "Missionaries are to Blame". I was about to post this message in that thread when the closure message was displayed. Still, I feel my post has some relevance and have started this new thread as suggested by Shri Praveen. It is now for all of us to ensure that this thread does not "sink" because of our attitudinal orientations and insensitivity to others' feelings.
My views on religious conversions from hindus and into Christianity in particular are as given below (these were typed in the context of the earlier thread):
Allow me to say that there is a great amount of miscommunication and misunderstanding which has given rise to this ongoing verbal duel. Since I know both RVR and HH for sometime now, I am sure this is natural one arising out of their respective pov.
HH tried to state that some negative aspects exist/existed in hinduism also. May be those were in the long past and not any longer now, except the core caste consciousness. RVR wanted the thread to expose only the present day proselytization efforts of the Christian Missionaries and the various techniques they adopt in achieving their goal; that the negatives in hinduism should not form a part of the discussions here, he feels. I suppose Shri Shrikrish also subscribes to this latter view.
The problem comes when, for people like me, HH and may be some others also, the whole hindu land presents itself as virgin, highly fertile area to the proselytizers because of the presence of the vast Dalit population who, as a class, do not nurture any significant empathy or belonging to either hinduism or the higher castes, including the sudras who claim themselves to be higher than the Dalits. This field position remains very much unchanged, unprotected and undefended or uncorrected, as it were, while we are merely trying to expose the activities of the missionaries. This is quite similar to a farmer who is incapable of protecting his land, but chooses to wail when someone else, who is shrewd and bold enough, comes brazenly and starts tilling the wailing farmer's fields, sows and reaps the harvest too and thus takes possession of the lands.
If we only understand this basic truth at the ground level, I think, we will not be spending our energy fighting here about why the negatives of hinduism are vitally linked to the missionary activities for conversion.
There was an opinion expressed; the missionaries are trying to break the internal cohesion of the brahmins. I would say that the brahmins have had very little cohesion as a community from historical times. So, there has been no great impediment to conversion of the lower castes because of opposition from brahmins' united strength. Now, when there is some feeble awareness for the need for such brahmin unity, the rapid inflow of the modern ways of living is making many among us to even doubt the need for continuing as brahmins any longer and such people are happy to be world citizens.
Hence, it is all quite OK to expose the activities of missionaries here in this forum or anywhere else. But it will serve no better than as a running commentary of what is going on and may benefit the missionaries more (it will be like the internal communication of the defending army in the hands of the invading army) than us, and will not be an effective strategy to counter those activities, IMO.
Learned members may ponder over and decide.
Shri Praveen has closed the previous thread titled "Missionaries are to Blame". I was about to post this message in that thread when the closure message was displayed. Still, I feel my post has some relevance and have started this new thread as suggested by Shri Praveen. It is now for all of us to ensure that this thread does not "sink" because of our attitudinal orientations and insensitivity to others' feelings.
My views on religious conversions from hindus and into Christianity in particular are as given below (these were typed in the context of the earlier thread):
Allow me to say that there is a great amount of miscommunication and misunderstanding which has given rise to this ongoing verbal duel. Since I know both RVR and HH for sometime now, I am sure this is natural one arising out of their respective pov.
HH tried to state that some negative aspects exist/existed in hinduism also. May be those were in the long past and not any longer now, except the core caste consciousness. RVR wanted the thread to expose only the present day proselytization efforts of the Christian Missionaries and the various techniques they adopt in achieving their goal; that the negatives in hinduism should not form a part of the discussions here, he feels. I suppose Shri Shrikrish also subscribes to this latter view.
The problem comes when, for people like me, HH and may be some others also, the whole hindu land presents itself as virgin, highly fertile area to the proselytizers because of the presence of the vast Dalit population who, as a class, do not nurture any significant empathy or belonging to either hinduism or the higher castes, including the sudras who claim themselves to be higher than the Dalits. This field position remains very much unchanged, unprotected and undefended or uncorrected, as it were, while we are merely trying to expose the activities of the missionaries. This is quite similar to a farmer who is incapable of protecting his land, but chooses to wail when someone else, who is shrewd and bold enough, comes brazenly and starts tilling the wailing farmer's fields, sows and reaps the harvest too and thus takes possession of the lands.
If we only understand this basic truth at the ground level, I think, we will not be spending our energy fighting here about why the negatives of hinduism are vitally linked to the missionary activities for conversion.
There was an opinion expressed; the missionaries are trying to break the internal cohesion of the brahmins. I would say that the brahmins have had very little cohesion as a community from historical times. So, there has been no great impediment to conversion of the lower castes because of opposition from brahmins' united strength. Now, when there is some feeble awareness for the need for such brahmin unity, the rapid inflow of the modern ways of living is making many among us to even doubt the need for continuing as brahmins any longer and such people are happy to be world citizens.
Hence, it is all quite OK to expose the activities of missionaries here in this forum or anywhere else. But it will serve no better than as a running commentary of what is going on and may benefit the missionaries more (it will be like the internal communication of the defending army in the hands of the invading army) than us, and will not be an effective strategy to counter those activities, IMO.
Learned members may ponder over and decide.