Misidentification persons logging in here and calling somebody as a proxy of some body else is not correct. When I was not logging into this form for few months, I was mis-identified for somebody else and some other gentleman was called as my proxy. Subsequently expressing apologies is not curing the hurt.
தீயினால் சுட்டபுண் உள்ளாறும் ஆறாதே நாவினால் சுட்ட வடு
But after some time, the member repeats the same
Even yesterday, Sri Suresoo has been offended. He has already expressed his displeasure in this thread and I am sorry to say, no body seems to address his feelings.
Repeatedly a particular member is offending others by calling proxy etc. Is it correct?
I am reminded of a story about a street dog which my grand mother use to tell me in my younger days. A street dog while going for sleep will decide that it will not touch banana leaves thrown to garbage after eating எச்சில் இலை from now onwards. But the moment somebody throws a banana leave, it will immediately jump to suck the same.
I wish members restrain from making such false allegations repeatedly.
All the best
Dear Shri RVR,
Please take a good look at yourself: http://www.tamilbrahmins.com/general-discussions/5114-missionaries-blame-9.html#post59907
First you made a post that i seem to "support violence and atrocities and also supporting fraudulent God-men cheating innocent people".
To you, nobody should post anything in their defence. Each time you make an allegation, you have to have the last word. And on that thread you did have the last word.
You have tried hard enough to brand me a missionary someway or the other. Now you find that there is no way you can continue to brand me as one, because i am not a missionary.
So finally you have resorted to calling me a street-dog, indirectly ofcourse. It shows how low you can go. It does not behoove well of you sir.
And to you, no apology can never cure any hurt, because your ego is so large sir, that it prevents you from doing so.
Shri RVR, each time it is you who first started personal attacks. But you cannot see it.
And i have mentioned the proxy thing only twice so far -- to you/uvsharma and next to suresoo/shivkc/sesh.
If ShivKC can ask whether 'Sahana' is my proxy, surely i too can ask him if he is a proxy or not.
I sent an email to Praveen asking him to check the IP addresses (of mine and Sahana's) to let ShivKC know. Praveen replied to us saying our IP addereses are different.
It is quite apparent that in this forum anything that is seen as "questioning' does not go well.
But Shri RVR, after interacting with you i learnt many things. Most importantly i learnt what caused the anti-brahmin movement. Considering you are from that generation, am not surprised regarding how and why it all begun. And after seeing 'dravidian' folks like swaminathasharma, am not surprised why other 'dravidians' go against 'brahmins' either.
I also learnt how vedists characterized other faiths in deplorable ways, and mislead folks, all because they cud not tolerate what the other side was saying.
Am also able to understand the extent, how much folks like yourself can go to be called brahmins. And i also understand how 'shastras' must have come about, with its interpolations and all.
So i must thank you for adding to my knowledge. If not for you, the vox populi of the brahmindom of tamilnadu, i wud never have read up, spoken and understood so many things in less than 24 months.
Am glad that brahmins in other states are different from tambrams. Thankfully, i also understand that all tambrams are not like yourself.
Please do remember Shri RVR, the only claim to any form of standing you have is because of your self-publicized and well-publicized charity work. Otherwise you wud be like a any other poster on the forum.
Please also remember, that someday you will grow too old and will not be able to do any charity work. Then this "image" that you are basking in, will be gone. It has happened to too many people i know.
Name and reputation do not last forever, unless you are a mahatma. And even the mahatma is not liked by everyone.
Regards.