• Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Arun Jaitley's outburst is justified: The Supreme Court is playing God

  • Thread starter Thread starter V.Balasubramani
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
V

V.Balasubramani

Guest
Arun Jaitley's outburst is justified: The Supreme Court is playing God

There is no one better than Arun Jaitley to call a spade a spade.

Two days ago, the Finance Minister minced no words in saying that the judiciary was trampling all over the constitution’s basic mosaic of the separation of powers. Angry about the judiciary’s repeated lunges into executive and legislative terrain, Jaitley said it all in one sentence: “Step by step, brick by brick, the edifice of India’s legislature is being destroyed”.

It’s a strong statement, and one that the Supreme Court should heed.

The Constitution gave the legislature, the executive and the judiciary primacy in their own domains, but the courts have been stomping all over legislative and executive territory, making laws rather than just interpreting them. And these interventions are not one-offs, occasional transgressions that may be necessitated by circumstances. It seems 'The Brethren' want to see themselves in the headlines almost daily, as if to prove they are the only worthies capable of running the country.

Friday's newspapers tell us that the Supreme Court has ordered a special investigation team to probe charges of wife-swapping among navy officers. Pardon me, but isn’t this the job of the police? So tomorrow if someone is beating his kids, we go straight to the Supreme Court with a public interest litigation (PIL)? If garbage is piling up in front of my house, I go to court again?

Read more at: http://www.firstpost.com/politics/s...icle-356-bcci-ipl-rbi-dance-bars-2779546.html
 
Oh I thought only others cut and paste!!!!!!

This was one of the replies in the same post.

Ranjit Kumar[/URL] • 10 hours ago Mr. Jaitley practices double standards and speaks with a forked tongue - that is natural as belongs to the RSS/BJP
THEN
January 30, 2011 (quoted by ANI as having said in Ranchi): “Parliament’s job is to conduct discussions. But many a time, Parliament is used to ignore issues and in such situations, obstruction of Parliament is in the favour of democracy. Therefore parliamentary obstruction is not undemocratic.”
August 22, 2012 (interview to Times Now): “We are not interested in a debate. What is there to debate?We have had bad experiences on these discussions in the past with the 2G scam.”
August 26, 2012 (outside Parliament): “There are occasions when obstruction in Parliament brings greater benefits to the country… Our strategy does not permit us to allow the government to use Parliament (for debate) without being held accountable… we do not want to give government an escape route through debate.”
August 28, 2012 (article in The Hindu): “Parliamentary obstructionism should be avoided. It is a weapon to be used in the rarest of the rare cases. Parliamentary accountability is as important as parliamentary debate. Both must coexist. If parliamentary accountability is subverted and a debate is intended to be used merely to put a lid on parliamentary accountability, it is then a legitimate tactic for the Opposition to expose the government through parliamentary instruments available at its command.”
 
We have a God fearing hindutva promoting govt and hindu Gods and godmen of special variety are also promoted by the govt.

No harm in having judiciary also playing God if the executive is to be prodded to work for public welfare.

Wrath of judiciary is more effective.

I am all for pro active judiciary.

It is the only organ of the constitution which is for fair play for the poor.

supreme court ki jai
 
Last edited:
I think where our Executive and Legislature failed the Supreme court has come to the rescue! Right from the days of Emergency the Judiciary has played a proactive role in protecting people's interest! Judicial activism by SC is not a bane for Indian democracy but a boon!
 



There are 837 comments for the same post .... and one is free to go through each leisurely....

May be for a few 'the Gods must be crazy' at times.

Cut and Paste ki Jai Ho!


P.S: BTW how many likes this quote:
“Oh judge! Your damn laws! The good people don't need them, and the bad people don't obey them.” Ammon Hennacy
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top