sangom
0
"The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence." It means that things always seem better elsewhere.
I do not know the French society before revolution, and not enough royalty were left to defend their culture, History is written by the victors.
We know a lot of revolution that produced the wrong results.
Ayatolla Iran. Cultral revolution in China, Khemar rouge in Combodia, etc.
A gradual change from within is better method for the life of people like us.
Look at the industrial revolution, or DotCom revolution etc.
Prasad,
I think you are deviating from the topic, slithering away. Anyway, please don't compare the incomparables;The Ayatollah Iran and Khmer rouge in Cambodia were not revolutions for bringing egalitarian society. They wanted to bring in a society strictly following the Shariat - and that too as per the ayatollah's interpretation - in Iran, and Khmer rouge, though initially an attempt to bring in communism, got extremely vitiated due to several extraneous factors like anti-vietnamism, and, imo, the cruelty trait of its leaders including Pol Pot. But the cultural revolution in China has been termed as a 'grave' left error. Even if all three were bad, that does not disprove the history of French Revolution and its aftermath (written by the victors - in a revolution normally there are no victors, but only revolutionaries and the rest), which is that the western society 'leaped' virtually into a modern era after that revolution.
I do not know what you are referring to by "the industrial revolution"; the dot com revolution went bust, did it not?