• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Globalization of the world

Status
Not open for further replies.
An interesting artcile by Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar (celebrated Journalist, Columnist) in Times of India...He is the younger brother of Manishankar Aiyar...Not sure if this was commented earlier in our threads...



In 1992, I wrote a book titled Towards Globalization. I did not realize at the time that this was going to be the history of my family.

Last week, we celebrated the wedding of my daughter, Pallavi. A brilliant student, she had won scholarships to Oxford University and the London School of Economics.

In London, she met Julio, a young man from Spain. The two decided to take up jobs in Beijing, China. Last week, they came over from Beijing to Delhi to get married. The wedding guests included 70 friends from North America, Europe and China.

That may sound totally global, but arguably my elder son Shekhar has gone further. He too won a scholarship to Oxford University, and then taught for a year at a school in Colombo. Next he went to Toronto, Canada, for higher studies. There he met a German girl, Franziska.

They both got jobs with the International Monetary Fund in Washington DC, USA. This meant that they constantly travelled on IMF business to disparate countries. Shekhar advised and went on missions to Sierra Leone, Seychelles, Kyrgyzstan and Laos. Franziska went to Rwanda, Tajikistan, and Russia. They interrupted these perambulations to get married in late 2003.

My younger son, Rustam, is only 15. Presumably he will study in Australia, marry a Nigerian girl, and settle in Peru.

Readers might think that my family was born and bred in a jet plane. The truth is more prosaic. Our ancestral home is Kargudi, a humble, obscure village in Tanjore district, Tamil Nadu. My earliest memories of it are as a house with no toilets, running water, or pukka road.

When we visited, we disembarked from the train at Tanjore, and then travelled 45 minutes by bullock cart to reach the ancestral home. My father was one of six children, all of whom produced many children (I myself had three siblings). So, two generations later, the size of the Kargudi extended family (including spouses) is over 200. Of these, only three still live in the village. The rest have moved across India and across the whole world, from China to SaudiArabia to Europe to America.

This one Kargudi house has already produced 50 American citizens. So, dismiss the mutterings of those who claim that globalisation means westernisation. It looks more like Aiyarisation, viewed from Kargudi.

What does this imply for our sense of identity? I cannot speak for the whole Kargudi clan, which ranges from rigid Tamil Brahmins to beef-eating, pizza-guzzling, hip-hop dancers. But for me, the Aiyarisation of the world does not mean Aiyar domination. Nor does it mean Aiyar submergence in a global sea. It means acquiring multiple identities, and moving closer to the ideal of a brotherhood of all humanity. I remain quite at home sitting on the floor of the Kargudi house on a mat of reeds, eating from a banana leaf with my hands. I feel just as much at home eating noodles in China, steak in Spain, teriyaki in Japan and cous-cous in Morocco. I am a Kargudi villager, a Tamilian, a Delhi-wallah, an Indian, a Washington Redskins fan, and a citizen of the world, all at the same time and with no sense of tension or contradiction.

When I see the Brihadeeswara Temple in Tanjore, my heart swells and I say to myself "This is mine." I feel exactly the same way when I see the Church of Bom Jesus in Goa, or the Jewish synagogue in Cochin, or the Siddi Sayed mosque in Ahmedabad: these too are mine. I have strolled so often through the Parks at Oxford University and along the canal in Washington, DC, that they feel part of me. As my family multiplies and intermarries, I hope one day to look at the Sagrada Familia cathedral in Barcelona and Rhine river in Germany and think, "These too are mine."

We Aiyars have taken a step toward the vision of John Lennon.

"Imagine there's no country, It isn't hard to do. Nothing to kill or die for, And no religion too."

My father's generation was the first to leave the village, and loosen its regional shackles. My father became a chartered accountant in Lahore, an uncle became a hotel manager in Karachi, and we had an aunt in Rangoon.

My generation loosened the shackles of religion. My elder brother married a Sikh, my younger brother married a Christian, and I married a Parsi. The next generation has gone a step further, marrying across the globe. Globalisation for me is not just the movement of goods and capital, or even of Aiyars. It is a step towards Lennon's vision of no country.

"You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. I hope one day you'll join us. And the world will be one."
 
I look at this article in 3 ways:

1)Either the writer tried very hard to preserve his culture and tradition and used to be a die hard traditionalist but later realized his kids did what they wanted..so he started singing a different tune!LOL

2) Or he truly got carried away with some new lifestyle of beef eating ..hip hop dance and wants to be "In" and "Cool"

3)Or he is a Jeevan Mukta finishing up his Prarabdha Karma.

Frankly speaking this is NOT globalization as in Vasudaiva Kutumbakam.

Globalization does not necessarily mean Inter religious or inter caste or inter racial marriage or any drastic change in life style or Amar, Akbar Anthonifying the family.

A person could have married out of his religion/race etc and yet be a bigot.

Globalization is a mind set.

Globalization is realizing that there is goodness in all humans irrespective of caste/religion/creed and mutual respect for the life style of others and adopting anything new that might be beneficial to us and discarding any "harmful" outdated insignificant tradition.
 
Last edited:
In many cases so called traditionalists shift their loyalty as they do not have an alternative

Most of these guys have misplaced loyalties and befuddled thinking

They crouch their language in lofty statements of global brotherhood

They use the jargon to tom tom that they are neo liberal

But in reality all this is a sham..The mixed cultures become culturally rootless...They are considered alien to the native breed

Go to any country...Mixed race children are derided, talked about in hushed tones..Names such as Mischling, bushie are used to sully their names...Are we not aware about the Anglo Indian category in our neighbourhood

In India taking this position is advantageous as you will be bracketed with the secular multi racial brigade
 
An interesting artcile by Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar (celebrated Journalist, Columnist) in Times of India...He is the younger brother of Manishankar Aiyar...Not sure if this was commented earlier in our threads...



In 1992, I wrote a book titled Towards Globalization. I did not realize at the time that this was going to be the history of my family.

Last week, we celebrated the wedding of my daughter, Pallavi. A brilliant student, she had won scholarships to Oxford University and the London School of Economics.

In London, she met Julio, a young man from Spain. The two decided to take up jobs in Beijing, China. Last week, they came over from Beijing to Delhi to get married. The wedding guests included 70 friends from North America, Europe and China.

That may sound totally global, but arguably my elder son Shekhar has gone further. He too won a scholarship to Oxford University, and then taught for a year at a school in Colombo. Next he went to Toronto, Canada, for higher studies. There he met a German girl, Franziska.

They both got jobs with the International Monetary Fund in Washington DC, USA. This meant that they constantly travelled on IMF business to disparate countries. Shekhar advised and went on missions to Sierra Leone, Seychelles, Kyrgyzstan and Laos. Franziska went to Rwanda, Tajikistan, and Russia. They interrupted these perambulations to get married in late 2003.

My younger son, Rustam, is only 15. Presumably he will study in Australia, marry a Nigerian girl, and settle in Peru.

Readers might think that my family was born and bred in a jet plane. The truth is more prosaic. Our ancestral home is Kargudi, a humble, obscure village in Tanjore district, Tamil Nadu. My earliest memories of it are as a house with no toilets, running water, or pukka road.

When we visited, we disembarked from the train at Tanjore, and then travelled 45 minutes by bullock cart to reach the ancestral home. My father was one of six children, all of whom produced many children (I myself had three siblings). So, two generations later, the size of the Kargudi extended family (including spouses) is over 200. Of these, only three still live in the village. The rest have moved across India and across the whole world, from China to SaudiArabia to Europe to America.

This one Kargudi house has already produced 50 American citizens. So, dismiss the mutterings of those who claim that globalisation means westernisation. It looks more like Aiyarisation, viewed from Kargudi.

What does this imply for our sense of identity? I cannot speak for the whole Kargudi clan, which ranges from rigid Tamil Brahmins to beef-eating, pizza-guzzling, hip-hop dancers. But for me, the Aiyarisation of the world does not mean Aiyar domination. Nor does it mean Aiyar submergence in a global sea. It means acquiring multiple identities, and moving closer to the ideal of a brotherhood of all humanity. I remain quite at home sitting on the floor of the Kargudi house on a mat of reeds, eating from a banana leaf with my hands. I feel just as much at home eating noodles in China, steak in Spain, teriyaki in Japan and cous-cous in Morocco. I am a Kargudi villager, a Tamilian, a Delhi-wallah, an Indian, a Washington Redskins fan, and a citizen of the world, all at the same time and with no sense of tension or contradiction.

When I see the Brihadeeswara Temple in Tanjore, my heart swells and I say to myself "This is mine." I feel exactly the same way when I see the Church of Bom Jesus in Goa, or the Jewish synagogue in Cochin, or the Siddi Sayed mosque in Ahmedabad: these too are mine. I have strolled so often through the Parks at Oxford University and along the canal in Washington, DC, that they feel part of me. As my family multiplies and intermarries, I hope one day to look at the Sagrada Familia cathedral in Barcelona and Rhine river in Germany and think, "These too are mine."

We Aiyars have taken a step toward the vision of John Lennon.

"Imagine there's no country, It isn't hard to do. Nothing to kill or die for, And no religion too."

My father's generation was the first to leave the village, and loosen its regional shackles. My father became a chartered accountant in Lahore, an uncle became a hotel manager in Karachi, and we had an aunt in Rangoon.

My generation loosened the shackles of religion. My elder brother married a Sikh, my younger brother married a Christian, and I married a Parsi. The next generation has gone a step further, marrying across the globe. Globalisation for me is not just the movement of goods and capital, or even of Aiyars. It is a step towards Lennon's vision of no country.

"You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. I hope one day you'll join us. And the world will be one."

This article is almost trash, according to me. This swaminathan married Gitanjali Iyer, has two kids by her and then married one Parsi woman. And so he speaks so highly about globalization ;)

I am reminded of the following Aesop's fable:

It happened that a Fox caught its tail in a trap, and in struggling to release himself lost all of it but the stump. At first he was ashamed to show himself among his fellow foxes. But at last he determined to put a bolder face upon his misfortune, and summoned all the foxes to a general meeting to consider a proposal which he had to place before them. When they had assembled together the Fox proposed that they should all do away with their tails. He pointed out how inconvenient a tail was when
they were pursued by their enemies, the dogs; how much it was in the way when they desired to sit down and hold a friendly conversation with one another. He failed to see any advantage in carrying about such a useless encumbrance.
"That is all very well," said one of the older foxes; "but I do not think you would have recommended us to dispense with our chief ornament if you had not happened to lose it yourself."
 
this is an old article, and if we search our archives, we can probably resuscitate a healthy discussion on the same.

swaminathan, may be only a few generations ahead, of most of our families. my gut feeling. without any prejudice.
 
There are no true Traditionalists. We all have compromised at some point in time. Those who claim to be pure traditionalist are either ignorant or worse liars.

The degree of compromise varies from one to another, and also depends on time and place.
 
Among humans the sexual instinct is as powerful as, if not more than, hunger and thirst. So, primitive man/woman must have most possibly searched for food and water first and, once his/her hunger & thirst were satiated, he/she should have turned his/her attention to mating and sex. (This does not mean that food and sex filled their entire lifetime, but these two occupied prime importance.)

A mate could be searched for and found only within one's walkable circle because, in those primitive days (before the invention of the wheel) no other mode of transport would have been available, excepting the Tarzan-like hop by clinging to long climbers. Therefore, the primitive humans (the very early homo sapiens) must have been compelled by circumstances to find a mate within a small circle. This possibly gave rise to the concept of clans, tribes, etc. At that level of clans & tribes, available evidence shows that the different tribes lived in mutual enmity because, for a tribe in the food gathering civilization stage, any new tribe in its vicinity was always a potential competitor to the available food resources in its sustenance area and hence had to be exterminated. As time passed and humans learnt the skill of slash & burn cultivation, the land occupied by each tribe became its most zealously guarded possession. May be due to gender inequalities there arose the practice of cattle rustling or duffing and along with this raiding for females also. The males of one tribe started mating only with the females of another tribe so raided and whose females were brought home as booty.

The above are a few of the basic first steps which gave rise to exogamy at the base level and endogamy at a larger level in developed human societies. SSAA is here boasting about the heroic deeds of his family in marrying throughout the world and tries to claim that therefore his family is "globalized". But it is a moot point whether the members of this globalized family have - all of them - a globalized outlook on all aspects of life. And, also what will happen to this magnificent globalized family if the countries of any two of its members declare war with each other. Hence, I for one, will have been impressed if SSAA or members of his extended family had shown the broadmindedness to marry from, say, Libya, Syria, Iraq, N. Korea, Pakistan etc.

This article is an (empty) boast about his own family's mulish preoccupation with exotic men/women.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top