prasad1
Active member
[FONT=q_serif]Saguna Brahman is Brahman conceived of as the Creator, Preserver and Destroyer of the Universe corresponding to Isvara. Advaita Vedanta, however, considers Nirguna Brahman as the only Reality. So what does Shankara think of Saguna Brahman? Shankara writes the following in his Brahma Sutra Bhasya III.II.14:[/FONT]
[FONT=q_serif] [/FONT]
[/FONT]https://www.quora.com/What-is-Saguna-Brahman-in-Advaita-Vedanta
[FONT=q_serif] [/FONT]
'Hence in sentences of this kind, the formless Brahman alone, just as It is spoken of by the texts themselves, has to be accepted. But the other texts, speaking of Brahman with form, have injunctions about meditations as their main objectives. So long as they do not lead to some contradiction, their apparent meanings should be accepted. But when they involve a contradiction, the principle to be followed for deciding one or the other is that, those that have formless Brahman as their main purport are more authoritative than the others which have not that as their main purport. It is according to this that one is driven to the conclusion that Brahman is formless and not its opposite, though texts having both the purports are in evidence.'
[FONT=q_serif]Thus as is clear from the above text, Saguna Brahman, Brahman with form actually does not exist since Brahman is really formless and it is described in Upanishadic texts only for the sake of meditation.
[/FONT]https://www.quora.com/What-is-Saguna-Brahman-in-Advaita-Vedanta