tks
0
tks, sometime back you asked what was meant by "high priest", here it is, an example!
You have repeatedly shown a proclivity to never engage in discussions/arguments, but simply present your views as though they are so self evidently true, like the high-priest has spoken, there can be no argument, not accepting what you say marks one as unserious, negatively obsessed, laughable, etc., etc.
Yes, I do offer strong criticisms against Brahminism, claims of Vedic science, blind-faith, etc. If you wish to criticize my views with cogent arguments, please do so, I would welcome it. I am willing to back up every word I say here, or, and if I am wrong, I will readily admit my fault and offer unconditional apology.
If you don't want to waste your time arguing with me about things that you know to be true, then, that is fine too, please go your way. But, refrain from making snide comments like these, it only shows you want to act as a Hota. Such behavior promotes unnecessary ill will.
Cheers!
Nara - 'On vedantam' thread you had no position to offer even after repeated attempts by me and perhaps Saidev. I asked you for a definition for 'Reality' and all you could come up with was an irrational response sidestepping the question in your usual negative and dismissive tone. When I showed that the criteria you implied for proof was illogical you had no more words. You were unable to define what a criteria for proof would be, yet you demanded proof. I also showed that your approach to debates resemble that of people of blind faith. It is hard to have meaningful debates when someone employs such tactics. If you have substance then share it.
I have not seen any of your posting to be balanced. I have not seen you describe in positive light any contributions to human kind from our Vedic Heritage period. Why do you come across as so fascinated with contributions by the West only?
I usually do not like to engage with people of faith even if they claim to be logical.
In the case of the so called Vedic science as I said in my post I am not supportive of tall claims. However in this instance someone says that the speed of light indicated during vedic period to be similar to what we know to be the value today. I don't know if it is true but I am intrigued. I know there are no methods described as to how someone may have measured. Regardless, I am fascinated because I do not have a negative attitude towards knowledge described during Vedic period.
If you have arguments to refute the above claim that the people of vedic times did not know the value of speed of light why dont you present a cogent argument with specifics rather than be dismissive . Why do you have to be always negative about any aspect of Hindu heritage - at least that is how it comes across to me from your posts. The best way you can engage with me is to put up specifics, and put forward cogent and logical arguments without an bias and negativity.
I have not been around Priests much so you can define the term and call me names!
I have not seen any of your posting to be balanced. I have not seen you describe in positive light any contributions to human kind from our Vedic Heritage period. Why do you come across as so fascinated with contributions by the West only?
I usually do not like to engage with people of faith even if they claim to be logical.
In the case of the so called Vedic science as I said in my post I am not supportive of tall claims. However in this instance someone says that the speed of light indicated during vedic period to be similar to what we know to be the value today. I don't know if it is true but I am intrigued. I know there are no methods described as to how someone may have measured. Regardless, I am fascinated because I do not have a negative attitude towards knowledge described during Vedic period.
If you have arguments to refute the above claim that the people of vedic times did not know the value of speed of light why dont you present a cogent argument with specifics rather than be dismissive . Why do you have to be always negative about any aspect of Hindu heritage - at least that is how it comes across to me from your posts. The best way you can engage with me is to put up specifics, and put forward cogent and logical arguments without an bias and negativity.
I have not been around Priests much so you can define the term and call me names!