• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Najma Heptulla tries to quell controversy, says she said 'Hindi' not 'Hindu'

Status
Not open for further replies.

prasad1

Active member
Minority Affairs Minister Najma Heptulla has stoked a controversy by reportedly calling all Indians "Hindus".


However, she sought to clarify her comments today, saying she had called all Indians Hindi, the Arabic term for people living in India and what she said was "not in relation to the religion but in relation to identity as nationality". She did not call them Hindus, she said.


Heptulla hinted at the need of having uniformity of identity for all Indians as she told PTI that she did not think "there is any country with three names in three different languages".


In Arabic, Indians are called Hindi and Hindustani and Indian in Persian and English respectively, she said. "We are Hindi, we are Hindustani by identification as nationality. Hindi Indians and Hindustani are all one and the same thing," she said. When asked for her views on RSS head Mohan Bhagwat's comments that Indians should be called Hindus, she declined to make any comment.


"I have no comment on that," she said.
Deccan_herald

Id this the congress_heptulla or the BJP avatar_heptulla?
Comment on the post:
Calling Bharatvasis "Hindi" makes even less sense. So the clarification is even more laughable than the original statement.

This is fishing in the troubled water of jugglery of words. Indian or Bharateya are the correct words as per constitution. Constitution is the best friend, philosopher and guide of our polity.
 
After stoking controversy over her 'Hindu' remark, minority affairs minister Najma Heptulla on Friday said she was misquoted and clarified she had called all Indians 'Hindi'- Arabic for people living in India- and not 'Hindus' as reported.


She said it was "not in relation to the religion but in relation to identity as nationality". Heptulla hinted at the need for uniformity of identity for all Indians. "There isn't any country with three names: in Arabic, Indians are called Hindi, Hindustani in Persian and Indian in English," she said.


Prominent religious leaders, however, disagreed. Pandit Jugal Kishore of Ayodhya's Ram-Janki Mandir said, "The Constitution talks of India, that is, Bharat. Hindu is a political coinage for extracting political advantage. If everyone in India is Hindu, then what's the identity of Hindus living in, say, Pakistan, England or Saudi Arab?"


The word Hindu was derived from the Sindhu river and defines a geographical area. "For RSS though Hindu isn't just a geographical identity, but denotes followers of certain rituals and scriptures. That makes it an institutional religion. Why then will followers of other religions be identified as Hindus?" asked Sant Vivek Das Acharya, head of Varanasi's Kabirchaura Mutt Trust.


Kabir panthis come from Hindu and Muslim families. "But, we don't go to temples or mosques. We are humanists. So, how can they bracket us with Hindus?" said the Acharya.


Ramakrishna Mission Delhi Secretary Swami Shantatmananda articulated the order's view founded by Swami Vivekananda, who PM Modi adopted as an icon: "Hinduism is not a religion. It's sanatan dharma which espouses supreme tolerance, acceptance and peaceful coexistence. Various religions came to India. They were all accepted and became part of this glorious country. Religion is purely a personal choice."


Ramakrishna Mission's practised policy is harmony of all religions. "By imposing a single identity, what are they trying to prove? The majority should take care of minorities, give them a feeling of comfort and confidence, not drive fear in them," said Swami Shantatmananda.


He urged pan-India Hindu identity advocates to return to Vivekananda who called for a collective resurgent India involving all communities and religions.


"Since BJP came to power at the Centre, there's not been any discriminatory sentence from those at the decision-making level. But, such divisive statements will tarnish the government's image. It's important to rein in those who make such statements. Instead of talking about non-issues, we should work hard to eradicate poverty, illiteracy and dwell on good governance," he said.
Najma Heptulla says all Indians are Hindus, later retracts - The Times of India
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top