• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

NaMo’s enemies within

Status
Not open for further replies.

prasad1

Active member
Modi’s real enemies are not out there; they are within his own party and within sections of what is called the saffron parivar, the ultra-conservative Hindu right wing, which seems to have become more assertive following Namo’s ascension to the PM’s gaddi.
The RSS, the BJP’s ideological backbone, which backed Modi’s prime ministerial candidature, is wary of any sign of economic liberalisation which could be seen as being ‘anti-swadeshi’, such as Modi’s continuing ambiguity on FDI in retail.
The opening up of railways and defence production raised many saffron hackles, including that of the BJP’s labour union.
In the meantime, saffron hawks like the ex-teacher-turned-book banner, Dinanath Batra continue to rake up controversies by rewriting history to promote ‘cultural nationalism’. Self-styled protectors of ‘Indian values’ vandalise a 200-year-old-staute of Queen Victoria. Ministers make pronouncements claiming that sex education is undesirable in schools, or that all Muslims going on Haj are Hindus.
Such ideological chauvinism undermines the new image of himself that Modi is seeking to project both internally and internationally: that he is no longer a leader only of Gujarat, or of Hindus, but a leader of 1.27 billion Indians and a statesman of global standing.
So why doesn’t Modi rein in irresponsible elements of the Hindu right, who could end up giving his leadership a bad name?
One reason could be that, as a good general, Modi knows which battles to fight and which to avoid, or at least postpone. The new PM has made his priority clear: get the derailed economy back on the tracks and going at full steam. All the rest will follow.
Economic progress, provided it is inclusive of all, will lead to social stability and peace between caste and creed.
A simplistic vision? Perhaps. But this what Modi seems to believe is the solution. And maybe he’s right.
So with his eyes firmly on the goal of economic progress, he wants to avoid petty skirmishes with elements of the parivar which would deplete his limited resources of time, energy and goodwill.
With friends like these, who needs foes? That seems to sum up Modi’s current quandary.
NaMo?s enemies within | Times of India Opinion
 
The JANATA government felt down due to dual membership.This actually is an outside opinion about the falling of janata government. The main reason is since moraji being a hardcore nationalist never comprising on his principles not able to adjust with sangh parivar and also RSS. Therefore if the sangh parivar and RSS if they are not keeping their ambition of having a Hindu Rashtra at a distance, it may again lead to the collapse of BJP may be within a short period of time.(Even within its five years of ruling time).
 
The JANATA government felt down due to dual membership.This actually is an outside opinion about the falling of janata government. The main reason is since moraji being a hardcore nationalist never comprising on his principles not able to adjust with sangh parivar and also RSS. Therefore if the sangh parivar and RSS if they are not keeping their ambition of having a Hindu Rashtra at a distance, it may again lead to the collapse of BJP may be within a short period of time.(Even within its five years of ruling time).
vigneshji
a good post from you

it is ultimately good economics that can make or break a govt.

idealogical battles on hindutva can really harm the BJP if it fails in taking up economic reforms on priority, control fiscal deficit and fight inflation.

janata govt fell as you say on dual membership issue and this govt with all is majority will go downhill , if does not put hindutva on backburner and concentrate on good

economic governance
 
The previous govt thrived on "group politics". By "group politics" I mean the provision of various kinds of exclusive priveleges to select groups - mostly along religious lines benefitting the minority religions. BJP came to power on the promise of treating everyone equal but it has not changed anything. If it continues down this path, it will be game over for BJP.
 
Hindutva is neither a backburner or frontburner issue. It is equal rights for all and no special privileges for some. Reservation, minority appeasement, conversion, jihadi love, deliberate abuse of hindus in media and by political parties, vote bank politics, falsifying history - these and similar issues which were encouraged and used by the media/political outfits for a divisive society need to be rectified and made known to all. Only hindutva has helped our country to survive and will be a preserving factor in future too.



vigneshji
a good post from you

it is ultimately good economics that can make or break a govt.

idealogical battles on hindutva can really harm the BJP if it fails in taking up economic reforms on priority, control fiscal deficit and fight inflation.

janata govt fell as you say on dual membership issue and this govt with all is majority will go downhill , if does not put hindutva on backburner and concentrate on good

economic governance
 
கால பைரவன்;257365 said:
BJP came to power on the promise of treating everyone equal but it has not changed anything. If it continues down this path, it will be game over for BJP.

Dear Sri KB,

Can you elaborate on this..What are the sore points?
 
கால பைரவன்;257365 said:
The previous govt thrived on "group politics". By "group politics" I mean the provision of various kinds of exclusive priveleges to select groups - mostly along religious lines benefitting the minority religions. BJP came to power on the promise of treating everyone equal but it has not changed anything. If it continues down this path, it will be game over for BJP.

A super majority mandate is being wasted in these gimmicky fixes. You are absolutely right this goodwill is being spent on foolish errands.
 
Modi’s Biggest Foes to Open India Seen With His Own Camp
By Unni Krishnan

For Ashwani Mahajan, the key to reviving India mirrors the movement to kick out the British a century ago. Only this time foreign companies selling everything from insurance to genetically modified seeds are the colonizers.


Prime Minister Narendra Modi offers the best chance to reclaim India’s past glory, according to Mahajan, co-head of an economic policy group linked to the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. Doing so, he said, means Modi must now resist calls to open the economy to the likes of Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Monsanto Co. (MON) and American International Group Inc.


“Protecting your economy against the onslaught of foreign competition is never bad and never wrong,” Mahajan said in an interview at the office of the Swadeshi Jagran Manch, a unit of the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh, a Hindu nationalist group that helped Modi take power. “The government should create an atmosphere where we are not dependent on foreign investment.”


The RSS poses what may be the biggest hurdle for Modi to overcome in following through on pledges to open up Asia’s third-largest economy. Modi must balance the need to secure the RSS’s help to win state elections later this year with pressures from pro-business supporters to spur investment and revive growth, according to Nikita Sud, an associate professor of development studies at the University of Oxford.

Modi’s campaign message of development, which led to India’s biggest electoral win in three decades, masked internal dissent among BJP allies on how much to open the economy. The party had pledged in its campaign manifesto to allow foreign direct investment to create jobs in sectors apart from multibrand retail, end the “tax terrorism” of the previous regime and make trade a pillar to revive “Brand India.”


Since taking office, Modi blocked a breakthrough deal at the World Trade Organization, refrained from allowing foreign companies to take majority stakes in the defense sector and retained a retroactive tax law that has entangled Vodafone Group Plc in a $2.4 billion dispute.
.....................
Modi last week called for a revival of the manufacturing sector. He invited foreign companies to “Come, make in India” while imploring his citizens to start producing goods India currently imports so it can become a net exporter. He also said he wouldn’t use his majority to push his agenda, saying he favors “strong consensus.”

In Gujarat, Modi’s RSS ties didn’t prevent companies such as Ford Motor Co. and Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. (MSIL) from investing in the state. Gujarat’s economy grew at a faster pace than India’s during his 12 years in office, with per capita income rising twice as fast as the national average.
Modi?s Biggest Foes to Open India Seen With His Own Camp - Bloomberg

Where are we going with this muddled message?
 
Modi should not only contain the Sangh Parivar radical elements, he must appear to be so. Looking other way for all their misadventure, highhandedness will result in people losing faith in Modi's leadership.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top