Of late we are seeing persons who prefers to give their daughter and son to any one without seeing the horoscope and stars. One Senior in temple commented"It is money that matches" The non believer in horoscope is unfit to be a brahmin, he should give his daughter to Muslim/ Christian if he is wealthy.Who is a brahmin? Because of these brahmins the community is blamed by others."
Is non believing horoscope leads to non believer of God? Then how these people will conduct marriage In revolution mode? No Prohit, No fire etc?
Will these persons follow Hindu rituals and sacrifices?
At his death will he do Sratham etc?
Wishing you to share your views on this.
I would like to bring up a point here..you see in our Puranas most marriages were without horoscope match.
Kings married which ever woman they fancied.
Even Brahmins married princesses when a King offered his daughter in marriage.
Rama married Sita based solely on the fact that He strung and broke the bow in Janaka's court.
Arjuna won Draupadi also based on skill of archery.
I don't think that Arjuna saw horoscope before he married Ulupi.
It was love at first sight and so with Subhadra.
Kusha married Kumudvati a Naga Princess when her brother Kumuda offered her hand in marriage to Kusha.
Princesses had Svayamvaram where they would chose the Prince/King they liked.
All Princes and Kings would be invited.
I did not see anywhere that a King or Prince had to have his horoscope matched before he was invited to a Syavamvara.
It was always considered an insult to a King if he was not invited for a Svayamvaram.
That means that horoscope match was NOT mandatory.
In fact a Kshatriya takes pride if he kidnaps a princess and marries her.
Does anyone check horoscope before kidnapping someone?
I guess horoscope matches were not really in vogue in ancient times.
So what was the reason ancients didn't really consider horoscopes in marriage?
The Royals had Brahmins for advisors so why didn't any Brahmin at that time advise horoscope match before any marriage?