• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Penguin to axe Wendy Doniger's controversial book The Hindus: An Alternative History

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wendy and penguin have gone for out of court settlement. It is creditable that hindu groups are for legal route and not violent protest route of Muslims and Christians.
 
Should we be proud of this? Why are we for banning thoughts and ideas? I know this book was not something I will buy or read, but at the same time I would not like to deny others the freedom to choose.

Eminent academics, writers and lawyers have come out strongly against the withdrawal of American academic Wendy Doniger's book, The Hindus: An Alternative History, following a settlement between publisher Penguin and petitioner Shiksha Bachao Andolan Samiti on Tuesday.

Noted Hindi literary critic Namwar Singh termed the act as an "attack on writers' freedoms". Having read Doniger's book, he said, he found it challenging. "It is not the kind of book that says 'yes sir' to everything. It challenges several beliefs. If Hindutva is so powerful and secure, it should tolerate it, and respond in kind. It is an open market, and the appropriate response to the written word is the written word itself, not a ban," said Singh.


Jeet Thayil, who came out in support of Salman Rushdie's banned book The Satanic Verses at the Jaipur Literature Festival in 2012, told TOI over phone that the development was "unfortunate". "It is unfortunate that a religion that is known for its tolerance is showing that fundamentalists are the same everywhere," says Thayil.

A number of leading academics have also jointly issued a statement against Penguin's decision to withdraw Doniger's book. The statement has been signed by the likes of historian Partha Chatterjee (Centre for Studies in the Social Sciences, Kolkata), Nayanjot Lahiri and Upinder Singh (department of history, Delhi University).


Senior Supreme Court advocate KTS Tulsi concurred with Singh's view of countering one book with another. "There is a growing tendency of intolerance in a certain section of society against the letter and spirit of the Constitution. Penguin may have succumbed because they did not want to be physically attacked. It shows helplessness against unruly mobs. It is unfortunate that this should happen in India where we pride ourselves on freedom of speech," he says.

Academics, writers decry Penguin's withdrawal of Doniger's book 'The Hindus' - The Times of India
 
Doniger will no doubt raise the ire of many purists - any discussion of whether the Vedic people ate cows always unleashes a firestorm of protest. (The sacred cow notwithstanding, there are few temples to cows.) But there is room for that debate in Hinduism. Hinduism has always been a syncretic religion, absorbing its invaders. That in modern times has been read as a weakness, a sort of passive femininity. Hindu nationalists want a more masculine, definitive religion with a single party line. But they have their work cut out in a religion with a deity like Ardhanarishvara, half man (Shiva), half woman (Shakti) and fully divine.

Sangomji has shown that Vedic Hindus did eat cows, and other meats. So if a European writes about the same thing why do have to go an a warpath?
http://www.tamilbrahmins.com/philos...hmins-eating-non-vegeterian-2.html#post171557
 
Last edited:
I do not understand what the big deal is about.
Perhaps I have not followed the story closely.

Freedom of expression is very much intact. Someone like Wendy wants to publish a book and writes all kinds of things under the name of academic freedom. Over time concoctions tend to become real. There are many top universities that propagate wrong information and award PhD and 'research' dollars.

There are others like Rajiv Malhotra, who through funding research, have shown that the academic publications are largely flawed. But that has not stopped the theories. Words and ideas have consequences. There are many avenues for people to seek justice.

There are other topic areas such as animal eating described in Ramayana and in Vedic rituals. In a serious academic book one must have a passion to seek overall truth and describe everything - not just animal eating which may be factual but other ideas too. If someone's work is one sided only then it is also freedom of expression of opposing groups to deal with this in a legal manner without issuing likes of Fatwas (which is unknown in Hinduism)

If anyone under the name of freedom of expression links produce of food industry with some serious health implications then the billion dollar food industry will use its power to squash the person. There was a time even powerful public figure like Oprah was taken to court by the food industry for airing some interviews about vegetarianism (I do not have all the precise facts but the gist of the overall story is correct).

So we can label someone as Hindutva type or someone as anti-hindu. The labeling is immature in my view.

Courts are there to ensure responsibility in the freedom of expression. Court may not always be correct but they offer a non-violent option.

If I read what is happening it seems everything is fine - nothing stops Wendy or her like minded people to publish their work elsewhere. Nothing will stop Rajiv Malhotra and his team to publish data opposing the conclusions. Nothing will stop groups from going to court and claim damages especially if there are elements of research that can shown by a few to be flawed.

If facts are accurate no publisher will back off so the courts enable one to instill responsibility in research especially if there are seemingly controversial statements.

It is neither a sad day or a happy day... It is just another day business as usual.
 
I think this fight for freedom of expression and individual liberty comes into operation whenever some artist either denigrates or depicts Hindus and Hinduism in an obnoxious manner. Eg Hussain's paintings. All the intellectuals of various make jump into the fray.

Unfortunately there is no outrage when Bloomberg apologises to Praful Patel, former Aviation Minister, and withdraws their book 'The Descent of Air India' that exposes the corruption and other irregularities that brought Air India to its knees. Why this selective outrage?
 
Or mohammed cartoons, taslima nasreens and her book lajja, life of christ book and movie; there are hundredd other instances when the freedom of speech mongers looked the other way and some psec rationalists said - freedom of speech is not universal and not a matter of right.

Now a tv serial produced by taslima is banned though it has nothing controversial. No one to support her.

I think this fight for freedom of expression and individual liberty comes into operation whenever some artist either denigrates or depicts Hindus and Hinduism in an obnoxious manner. Eg Hussain's paintings. All the intellectuals of various make jump into the fray.

Unfortunately there is no outrage when Bloomberg apologises to Praful Patel, former Aviation Minister, and withdraws their book 'The Descent of Air India' that exposes the corruption and other irregularities that brought Air India to its knees. Why this selective outrage?
 
All this freedom of expression bs apparently means one thing when Wendy Doniger says or expresses something, but objectionable and insulting if someone else were to say something about which she feels hurt!

In 1992, Doniger ( born Jewish) accused Joseph Campbell (scholar best known for his work in comparative mythology and comparative religion ) of being anti-semitic . Her objection was with the use of the phrase "chosen people" in his books.

Here is a letter to the editor in the New York Times dated March 22, 1992, wherein the writer made the following comments about Wendy Doniger:

The green-eyed Ms. Doniger's vitriolic opinions about Joseph Campbell were well known. Can anyone with a modicum of fairness possibly believe that Campbell "never got below the surface of anything," that he "cooked up the TV dinner of mythology" so that "people in California could feel better about themselves"? Ms. Doniger's judgment that Campbell was "neither a scholar nor a gentleman"says more about Wendy Doniger than about Joseph Campbell. …..SAM KEEN Sonoma, Calif.
http://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/22/books/l-a-fire-in-the-mind-847892.html

So, can we therefore turn the tables on Doniger and say that the book she wrote "never got below the surface of anything", that she "cooked up the TV dinner trash talk about Hinduism" so that her colleagues in Divinity College could feel proud of a fellow faculty trashing a non-abrahamic religion?
 
Last edited:
How Wendy Doniger crucified famous scholar Joseph Campbell

I looked into the motivations behind Doniger’s trashy interpretations of Hinduism. I came across this interesting letter ( summarized below) , written in The Times-News dated Feb 21, 1992 by Dr. Eugene Kennedy, professor of psychology at Loyola University in Chicago.

I am providing a link to the original letter .
The Times-News - Google News Archive Search

Summary:


Since his death in 1987, Joseph Campbell has experienced in a strange way the events that are central to Christian belief about the end of life: crucifixion, death and resurrection. The sequence is a mystery about which Campbell often wrote.

Campbell, the prolific author and scholar of worldwide mythology, however, has suffered these in reverse order. He has experienced resurrection before crucifixion.

He was resurrected through an enormously popular series of interviews conducted by Bill Moyers and aired by PBS. Campbell's engaging personality and ideas became accessible to millions of Americans who had never heard of him while he was alive.

For people of many backgrounds and religious faiths, Campbell, though dead, became a vital presence, a man resurrected to whom they listened, enthralled, as he explained the cultural and personal significance of abiding mythological themes.

Campbell, a long time professor at Sarah Lawrence College in Bronxville, N.Y., became a folk hero among people intrigued by his studies of myths as paradigms of human spirituality.

Apparently his popularity was intolerable to a ….. highly threatened bag of writers and scholars. They have become his accusers and crucifiers, assassinating Campbell in articles and reviews.

Only the latest of these is Wendy Doniger, a professor at the Divinity School of the University of Chicago. In a New York Times review, Doniger examined Campbell’s biography, A Fire in the Mind, written by Stephen and Robin Larsen.

But Doniger’s review is less an analysis of the book’s merits and more a bitter account of Campbell’s demerits as a person, a teacher and a man of letters. …….Doniger(‘s review)…… unconsciously reveal(s) more about (herself) than about Campbell in the posthumous critiques.

A pervasive tone of resentment and anger runs like acid through the attacks. …appears to twist his posthumous recognition (to be) a personal attack on (her) own work, making (herself) sound like sore loser in a contest of (her) own construction. Secondly, (such people) distort to their own critical purposes what Campbell said or wrote.

Campbell opened people to the spiritual significance of phrases whose richness was obscured …by those who see only their superficial meaning – by those, indeed, who would prefer to think of religion as something dead and gone. In providing us with a fresh spiritual vocabulary, Campbell rehabilitated every religion as a potent source of meaning and direction in life.

Perhaps that is what these unhappy critics cannot stand – that the spiritual nature of human experience makes urgent demands on our opinions and behavior – and why they need, in order to comfort their own barren souls, to put Campbell to death again.
By Dr. Eugene Kennedy - professor of psychology at Loyola University in Chicago.
 
Last edited:
<personal insults are not allowed. please avoid post such messages in future. If you have an issue with another member, sort it out in private and not in public. If you are unable to come to a solution, suggest that you ignore the members posting. - Praveen>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The withdrawal of scholar Wendy Doniger's book The Hindus highlights shrinking freedom of speech in India — and more. That Doniger's critics — led by 84-year-old Dinanath Batra of the perversely named Shiksha Bachao Andolan Samiti, followed by Vishwa Hindu Parishad — expressed annoyance at her book by launching an indefatigable legal campaign won't surprise many. Hindutva's ideologues have led often violent movements to ban works of art and academia — like MF Husain's paintings and James Laine's book on Shivaji.


What is surprising is Doniger's publishers, Penguin India, buckling and agreeing to pulp her book. This reflects the growing power of bullying self-appointed censors, with governments, politicians and courts seldom standing in their way. If the law is trying to protect religious sentiment, the irony is that it is Doniger's work — not Batra's — that celebrates Hinduism. She appears to make the case that sex was treated by Hinduism as a natural, beautiful part of life, not to be treated with guilt and shame as Semitic religions may demand. This can hardly be construed as an attack on Hinduism. But by attacking Doniger's work for discussing sensuality in Hindu life, her opponents display a Victorian hangover with a Taliban temperament. Persistent attacks like these, and supineness of authorities, raise the question whether democracy — and India's future as a nation-state — can survive without freedom of expression.


For an answer, look to Pakistan. Indian laws which forbid offence to any religion mimic Pakistan's notorious blasphemy laws, and Hindutva is perhaps the only force in the world driven by Pakistan envy today. If we go down the path of hurt sentiments and incentivising professional offence takers, we will soon have no defence left against the radicalism tearing Pakistan apart.
Withdrawal of Doniger book highlights sway of Taliban-like forces in India - The Times of India
 
Does the Doniger book meet the basic requirements of Interfaith Dialogue?

Prof Bharat Gupt had presented a criticism paper on wendy's book in an international conference; wendy refused to take part in panel discussions in that conference. Below is an extract from Prof Bharat's post in another forum. Key points:
1. Anyone opposing wendy like anti hindu writers are immediately labeled as RSS members.
2. Existing history of nehruvian socialism and marxist version of history is peddled by indian and west universities, and the fort supported by the secular govt, west funded chairs and projects are difficult to dislodge.
3. Why penguin decided to go out of court settlement when it has the support of legal luminaries and financial reserve? Because it knew that the book will not stand scrutiny and will be found offensive even by liberals.
4. The USA and european countries can no longer call their version of freedom, ethics and behaviour as universal human rights.

Quote:

The tone of all Doniger Defenders is to stereotyping Batra as an RSS man. This is keeping the whole debate away from the real issues regarding culture and history. Here, they are presuming that all those who object to the existing books written under a given dispensation of Nehruvian secularism and the dominating Marxist version of history, are all RSS men and that the prevailing "Discovery of India" version of history and culture is perfect and true. Nobody seems to question why the debates which should have happened in the universities and schools are not taking in those places and why Batra has to go to Court.

Doniger Defenders do not even consider the possibility of the truth being that there could be a lot of falsehood and distortion in the given books of history and culture and it may have been done so, to please the ruling party and get positions and benefits to keep the establishment happy. I do not understand why the Courts have given so much relief to Batra if he is only raising bogus demands. Are the Courts all full of RSS minded judges? Please wake up and come to REAL ISSUES. We need debates in public forums and these have been denied for years. Why did Penguin shy away from litigation, Do not they have scholars to represent them in the Courts? OR is it that there many portions in Doniger's book which could have been pronounced as offensive even by very liberal standards? Does her book observe the basic requirement of interfaith dialogue that you have to be respectful and sedate and not provocative as religious matters have highly emotive associations? Any book by an outsider who does not profess to be a Hindu but outsider to that faith becomes a dialogue between Hinduism and Others.

Also remember that we are now living in post Khobragade episode world. The USA and the general Euro American establishment whether of academia or of politics cannot simply call their notions of ethics and normative behavior as &#145;universal human rights&#146; and the traditions and emotional lives of erstwhile colonies as material to reshape and reform. Prof Bharat Gupt, Retd, DU
Bharat Gupt
Associate Professor (Retd), Delhi University,
 
The publisher has reportedly agreed to a settlement with the group that includes withdrawing and destroying all published copies of the book. In a Feb. 11 statement posted on the Facebook page of PEN Delhi, Doniger expressed concern for what that portends. “I was, of course, angry and disappointed to see this happen, and I am deeply troubled by what it foretells for free speech in India in the present, and steadily worsening, political climate,” Doniger wrote, referring to the recent surge of Hindu nationalist sentiment ahead of national elections this spring. Penguin India has yet to issue comment on the matter.
The development comes uncomfortably close on the heels of reports last month that Bloomsbury India was withdrawing another allegedly offending tome. According to local media, the publishing house withdrew The Descent of Air India, by Jitender Bhargava, after a defamation lawsuit was filed by former Civil Aviation Minister Praful Patel, whom the book holds responsible for the airline’s financial losses. The publisher issued a public apology to Patel, who is currently Minister of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises. Bhargava stands by his book.


India’s tough libel laws are often exploited by interest groups eager to silence or censor unwanted voices. India was the first country to ban Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses in 1988; the country’s most famous artist, M.F. Husain, died in exile in 2011 after facing death threats from far-right Hindu groups angered by his paintings of Indian deities in the nude.


As Doniger pointed out in her statement, readers in and outside India are still free to download The Hindus on Kindle. But the buying a book online feels like something of a hollow victory if hard copies are being removed from the shelves of the local bookseller. The author wrote that Penguin India tried to defend her work, but was “finally defeated by the true villain of this piece—the Indian law that makes it a criminal rather than civil offense to publish a book that offends any Hindu, a law that jeopardizes the physical safety of any publisher, no matter how ludicrous the accusation brought against a book.”
Penguin India to Recall and Destroy Wendy Doniger's Book 'The Hindus' | TIME.com

Doniger, a professor of the history of religions at the University of Chicago, is no stranger to this kind of controversy. Her studies of Hinduism have sought to recover the buried, heterodox Tantric tradition from under the weight of the orientalist's favourite form of Hinduism – Vedanta. For European orientalists, Vedantism was the closest to their own monotheism – a set of faith practices bourgeois in their mood and conduct. Tantrism – with its impurities of sex and diet – seemed out of favour. Doniger and her collaborators sought to revive interest in Tantrism, for which they turned to new methods of interpretation, notably psychoanalysis.

The attack on books for being anti-Hindu began in the 1990s. Doniger's student Jeffrey Kripal was taken to task for his suggestive Kali's Child. In a foreword to that book, Doniger wrote that it would "delight many readers, infuriate others, and generate a great deal of creative controversy". What she had in mind was "creative controversy" amongst Indologists. She could not have foreseen the calls for censorship and death threats that Kripal received.

he party of the Hindu right, BJP, believes that it will win the national elections this year, with its prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi leading it to victory. Alongside the court cases of people such as Batra has been a chilling breeze through the media as owners have begun to cull editors who have been critical of Modi, notably Open Magazine's Hartosh Singh Bal and television journalists Rajdeep Sardesai and Sagarika Ghosh. It is in this context that Penguin decided to withdraw and pulp Doniger's book. That Penguin did not fight the case says a great deal about the limitations of corporate commitment to freedom of speech.

Doniger has a real case here. Her book on other peoples' myths is not an insult to religion but a tribute to its complexity. If we are no longer able to breathe in all of our traditions in order to exhale the best of our capabilities, we will become a desiccated civilisation. As Gandhi wrote in 1925: "It is good to swim in the waters of tradition, but to sink in them is suicide."
 
Last edited:
The tone of all Doniger Defenders is to stereotyping Batra as an RSS man. This is keeping the whole debate away from the real issues regarding culture and history. Here, they are presuming that all those who object to the existing books written under a given dispensation of Nehruvian secularism and the dominating Marxist version of history, are all RSS men and that the prevailing "Discovery of India" version of history and culture is perfect and true. Nobody seems to question why the debates which should have happened in the universities and schools are not taking in those places and why Batra has to go to Court.

Doniger Defenders do not even consider the possibility of the truth being that there could be a lot of falsehood and distortion in the given books of history and culture and it may have been done so, to please the ruling party and get positions and benefits to keep the establishment happy.

What is the party affiliation of Prof Gupta? Knowing your personal affiliation with RSS, your opinion can not be objective. I do not support Doniger's views, but at the same time I would like to know more about my religion.
 
Wendy, witzel and their coterie must be fought by all satvik means - legal, confrontation in conferences, journals, internet, forums, blogs and voluntary brushtam by all self respecting hindus. Of course the methods followed by others - physical attacks, stabbing and murder - in case of satanic verses is to be eschewed. Of course, hindus will never do that.
 
I have no association with RSS as a member or volunteer. Your view has no merit as always. But your hatred for RSS, BJP and other organisations sympathetic to hindu values stand out like a sore finger. For once go to original sources to know about hindutva than relying on parroted versions from psecs.

I do not know nor care for Prof Gupt's political affiliation. It is not relevant for this topic.

What is the party affiliation of Prof Gupta? Knowing your personal affiliation with RSS, your opinion can not be objective. I do not support Doniger's views, but at the same time I would like to know more about my religion.
 
Wendy, witzel and their coterie must be fought by all satvik means - legal, confrontation in conferences, journals, internet, forums, blogs and voluntary brushtam by all self respecting hindus. Of course the methods followed by others - physical attacks, stabbing and murder - in case of satanic verses is to be eschewed. Of course, hindus will never do that.

So bullying is Satvic, what an interpretation. LOL
 
"One of the things that Hindus have seldom realised in India is that these laws exist, and they have teeth."

This quote from the article referred; this is vocalised by subramanyam swami too - he says almost all crimes we face can be covered and fought with existing laws; the need to change the law is only an excuse to delay.

கால பைரவன்;230540 said:
 
Our dharma permits, rather insists, that we fight evil by all means. A refresher course may help to clear doubts and avoid wise cracks.
Evil defined by who? You.
A refresher in humility may be in order.
The Gita ends with Krishna telling Arjuna he must choose the path of good or evil, as it his his duty to fight the Kauravas for his kingdom. In that, he is correcting the balance of good and evil, fulfilling his dharma, and offering the deepest form of selfless service. Arjuna understands and, with that, proceeds into battle.
 
Wendy Doniger’s fake victimhood

Another post by Arvind Kumar on this subject; some excerpts and link for full article.

Wendy Doniger’s fake victimhood

The publishing house voluntarily withdrew the book in the face of a police complaint against them. The fact that it is a voluntary withdrawal is clearly stated in the settlement document, and therefore, this issue is nowhere close to being a violation of anybody’s free-speech rights.

Among the charges listed in the complaint against Penguin Books were charges of plagiarism, false claims in the book, and that it was written with a Christian missionary zeal. For example, the complaint alleged that the book falsely claimed that the image on the jacket of the book was from a temple in Puri in Odisha even though that was not the case. If true, such false claims would at least violate consumer protection laws in India.

The fact that the publisher chose to withdraw the book instead of fighting out the case means that the publishing firm probably assessed that they would lose this case as the claims in the complaint were accurate.

MF Husain was a cheerleader for Indira Gandhi’s censorship laws during her Emergency era and was also directly responsible for banning books as he was a Member of the Parliament when books like the Satanic Verses were banned.
When the same laws were applied to him after decades of his victims remaining silent and tolerating his shenanigans, he and his supporters started their organized wailing sessions in the media and Western academia.

Within the US, Wendy Doniger is known to support a political party which advocates a policy that they call the “fairness doctrine.” According to this policy, political opponents will be targeted and compelled to be “fair” by presenting opposing views that are not in agreement with their actual views.

Dr. Subramanian Swamy was prevented from offering his course at Harvard University after Diana Eck, a White professor, organized a campaign to oust him in response to an article Dr. Swamy wrote in an Indian newspaper articulating his views on fighting terrorism and removing friction between Hindus and Muslims.

In another recent case, the students at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School were pressured into withdrawing an invitation they had extended to Narendra Modi. The culprits were the university’s faculty members who disagreed with Modi’s views.

http://www.indiafacts.co.in/wendy-donigers-fake-victimhood/#sthash.4j7wbeIK.LzV32PWw.dpbs
 
All these freedom of speech argument I have read in this case seems baseless.

Nothing stops from Wendy to have a website and publish her theories. To publish a book and make money means that a publisher is tacitly giving extra credibility to her theories which in the past have not stood the test of challenge. A publisher may decide based on their business goals if they want to publish a submission or not. If they decide against publishing based on their assessment to opposing views that is their business.

If someone wants to really know what Wendy has written much is available in terms of papers and PhD dissertations etc.

If she has a website that is not banned in India and will not be banned.

In the past Rajiv Malhotra has taken specific points of Wendy's theories and academically through research refuted the points she and her students have made. When one looks at the details it is clear that University of Chicago loses its academic excellence in my mind by allowing PhD to be granted to nonsense.

I say nonsense not out of my bias but having read the opposition presented by Rajiv Malhotra in certain theories. If Wendy had acknowledged those points and responded as well as included those points in her future work I would have more respect for her work even if I do not agree with her analysis. But that was not the case from whatever I know.

If someone sends a paper to Nature or any other publications they have the right to reject based on the scholarly merit and legitimacy of analysis. It is will be ludicrous to cry freedom of expression in a such a case.

If a book publisher decides based on careful study of opposing views that a book is not legitimate in terms of its content they have every right to not publish it. The publishing company could lose a lot in terms of its credibility. Crying that this is denying freedom of expression by Wendy and her supporters is basically immature.

Freedom of expression does not mean one will not get challenged. So long there are avenues like websites that is accessible to one and all AND there are no Fatwas, the freedom of expression is very much intact in this case . Only thing denied in this case is that Wendy cannot make money or create higher level credibility by publishing a book of her theories.

I think Sri KB's reference in post #18 is on the mark. Using the legal system by opposing people is also freedom of expression unless the laws themselves are shown to be against it.
 
So arjuna killed the evil kauravas who were guilty of - usurping the kingdom, plotting to kill the pandavas several times, disrobing draupadi, and many more minor offences. He did not understand a word of what krishna said, and simply obeyed him - fight to rid evil. Simple! Krishna too killed sishupala when the latter abused him incessantly. With wendy, only her publisher has withdrawn the book when abusive content in the book were pointed out. Two years ago, gita press gorakpur too withdrew a book by a wendy loyalist american, from circulation, when offensive passages denigrating lord ganesha were pointed out.

Evil defined by who? You.
A refresher in humility may be in order.
The Gita ends with Krishna telling Arjuna he must choose the path of good or evil, as it his his duty to fight the Kauravas for his kingdom. In that, he is correcting the balance of good and evil, fulfilling his dharma, and offering the deepest form of selfless service. Arjuna understands and, with that, proceeds into battle.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Latest ads

Back
Top