N
nachi naga
Guest
re
chellamay neenga engayyyo poiteenga saar,sapthajihva:first:
Shri RVR
The incident has certain assumptions to go with, for the story to be logical. AD should have had prior knowledge that the man was innocent, and that the group chasing them were rowdies...
Let us consider another scenario:
Assume, that AD sees a person being chased by another group. Both are alien to him; the chased ducks into an alley and hides himself. The chasing group comes up and asks AD as to where the other was (or that had he seen him hide)... What would AD say?
AD is always on the side of vaimai and he tells them that he did not see anything... They go elsewhere and the chased man is saved.
Later towards the day, AD is again walking along when he sees the group of chasers passing by with a mournful attitude. On asking why they were so mournful, he gets the reply that they were not able to catch a person, who had earlier burgled a house after murdering the aged inmates. Somehow he was seen by one of the members of the party who had raised the alarm; so the murderer, leaving behind all his loot took off to save himself.
What would run through AD's mind...?
So here unmai should be spoken. I can equally cite a contrasting example where vaimai would triumph.
We can do this now because we are creating sequences to support whatever we think is logical; but can we take that decision in real time?
----------------------------------------------
No, I am not against vaimai or unmai; but both can be equally dangerous when then are applied without 'total' information. The right questions have to be asked at the proper time for all the facts to be revealed. Even then it is a tough ask...
So let us be wise and become over-smart and use vaimai and unmai to the greater benefit...
Regards,
chellamay neenga engayyyo poiteenga saar,sapthajihva:first: