OP
OP
Ramaa
Guest
Kunjuppu,
I have high regards for you. Rest assured.
Re: Canada, I am learning from you, a friend, having lived there for years. இக்கரைக்கு அக்கரை பச்சையோ?!
But if I were to step aside and think about it I am tempted to make the following observations:
The difference between India and Canada for those Europeans who went to these places some 350 years ago or more is the following.
India was already well populated and had a vibrant history, civilization and tradition. Any settlement in it could only be in the absorption in its strong current. Unlike the Islamists the Europeans had a stronger roots in their homeland that eventually they abandoned the colony and went home.
Canada on the other hand had a sparce population and huge land. I think this would apply to the whole of North America and even Australia and Newzealand. The blood spilled in South America could have been far greater for their was a more established civilization of the Incas.
In any case the white man made it their 'home' in these new lands. Even the umblical cord with Britain was severed in a couple of centuries.
With increasing immigration into these countries from countries around the globe and the variety of ethnic population, I figure the guilt factor that you mention would begin to diminish. Their beliefs, culture and traditions of the igloo living, fishing and hunting natives, I am afraid, may not compete well with those of the various immigrants. I am sure that there is no conversion factor either as have been attempted on us Indians by the Abrahamic religions.
So the situation is one of practicality. Religion is the culture of the 'head' and the 'home' where it should be and in public no one should outsmart the other with his culture. I had heard that the Sikhs had turban and kirpan issue and the Muslims had the purdha issue. They were trying to bring their religions from their homes and places of worship to public places and places of work. I have not heard much about since then. Perhaps I was not paying attention. You can help us with the developments.
I believe, by and large, there is amity between the citizenry and Karunanidhis cannot make money dividing people on being Brahmin or otherwise! Oh, yea, I heard Englishmen and Frenchmen are at each other's throat. How is it going?
I have high regards for you. Rest assured.
Re: Canada, I am learning from you, a friend, having lived there for years. இக்கரைக்கு அக்கரை பச்சையோ?!
But if I were to step aside and think about it I am tempted to make the following observations:
The difference between India and Canada for those Europeans who went to these places some 350 years ago or more is the following.
India was already well populated and had a vibrant history, civilization and tradition. Any settlement in it could only be in the absorption in its strong current. Unlike the Islamists the Europeans had a stronger roots in their homeland that eventually they abandoned the colony and went home.
Canada on the other hand had a sparce population and huge land. I think this would apply to the whole of North America and even Australia and Newzealand. The blood spilled in South America could have been far greater for their was a more established civilization of the Incas.
In any case the white man made it their 'home' in these new lands. Even the umblical cord with Britain was severed in a couple of centuries.
With increasing immigration into these countries from countries around the globe and the variety of ethnic population, I figure the guilt factor that you mention would begin to diminish. Their beliefs, culture and traditions of the igloo living, fishing and hunting natives, I am afraid, may not compete well with those of the various immigrants. I am sure that there is no conversion factor either as have been attempted on us Indians by the Abrahamic religions.
So the situation is one of practicality. Religion is the culture of the 'head' and the 'home' where it should be and in public no one should outsmart the other with his culture. I had heard that the Sikhs had turban and kirpan issue and the Muslims had the purdha issue. They were trying to bring their religions from their homes and places of worship to public places and places of work. I have not heard much about since then. Perhaps I was not paying attention. You can help us with the developments.
I believe, by and large, there is amity between the citizenry and Karunanidhis cannot make money dividing people on being Brahmin or otherwise! Oh, yea, I heard Englishmen and Frenchmen are at each other's throat. How is it going?
Last edited: