Vaagmi
0
Yes sir...I can understand.
1.Even before many years ago people of other religions have also asked me questions but these days I do not answer and change the topic right away.
2.Religion is one topic I only enjoy talking to a person whom I know has no hidden agenda and to a great extent many Hindus themselves try to modify Hinduism to make it sound acceptable to people of other religion.
3.Deep down inside most Hindus do not really know to answer any question cos very few take the trouble to get to know religion in the true sense..but the more we get to know religion..the more we realize there is nothing we can actually talk about in the real sense..so finally one has to remain silent.
4.Its not that Hinduism has no answers..its just that there is just no one question that has just one answer.
Its multidimensional and this at times can not be entirely grasped by people of other religion cos their mind is used to just a fixed way of Q and A which is Draconian and based on either heaven or hell in approach.
So I do not usually engage in conversations becos technically its a waste of time and energy.
A good one.
My thoughts:
2. I would discuss religion with anyone. If there is a hidden agenda all the more good. I get either my understanding of the religion proved doubtful/wrong or I get re-validation for my understanding. As I grew up I have traversed a road which had many stops. At one stop I might have been a left extremist fighting for the telugu construction workers subsisting in the make shift shacks(called zopda patties in the local lingo) in the shadows of Mumbai's multi-storied buildings. At that time the word 'god' did not have any meaning for me. But that was just a stop on the long road. And I evolved only because I talked and discussed with intelligent people from different walks of life. So I will not shut out knowledge if comes from sources which have a hidden agenda. The agenda is theirs. it can never become mine. LOL. "The hindu who may appear to have modified hinduism to make it sound acceptable to other religionists" can even be me. I do that because people speak freely only when you appear to be with them on the same page atleast partially. They feel encouraged to speak only then. That benefits me. I am not manipulating. I am just temporarily agreeing to a contrarien view so that the conversation can move further.
3. "most hindus"-may be true. But there Are people who really know what they know and talk about. Absolute silence in the face of questions or a Zen Budhdhist response with cryptic, confusing, densely meaningful koans are okay for Acharyas and Masters or Rshis and Yogis. Not for ordinary people. We have to probe, ask questions, get replies, express responses/views, ruminate, meditate and understand. Stonewalling is not okay for everyone.
4. That is an underestimation of other religionists. I am not talking here about the gospel preachers. There are brilliant people in other religions too who understand the situation well.
So Renukaji, try to speak freely next time when you come across some one with a view. You may reap a windfall. LOL.
Last edited: