• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Spectre of caste trails yet another couple R. ARIVANANTHAM

Status
Not open for further replies.

prasad1

Active member
Even before the district has fully recovered from the reverberations set off by the tragic end to the life of Dalit youth Ilavarasan after his inter-caste marriage, another couple is facing trouble.

G. Suresh (31) belongs to the Vanniyar community and his wife S. Sudha (23) is a Dalit. Village elders belonging to the Vanniyar community have ordered a social boycott against them.

The youth’s family at Veppamarathur village has been ostracised allegedly by people of his community for having married a Dalit woman from Parayapatti in Harur taluk.

Alleging no action had been taken on a complaint she lodged with Bommidi police on June 22, Sudha submitted a petition to the Superintendent of Police Asra Garg on Wednesday, seeking protection from those who opposed the marriage.

Sudha said she and Suresh got married on April 21, 2010 with the consent of the parents on both sides. After the wedding, Suresh went to Hosur for work every day and Sudha stayed with her in-laws at Veppamarathur village. The couple then had a male child.

Trouble began around May-end when villagers at Veppamarathur collected Rs. 1,000 from every house to celebrate the Mariamman Temple festival. When they came to know that Suresh was married to a Dalit, they returned the money his family had contributed.


Suresh told The Hindu that the Rs. 14,000 his family contributed earlier for the construction of the temple was also returned.


The village elders then convened a ‘panchayat’, which ordered that none from Suresh’s family should enter the temple. They were also barred them from drawing water from common facilities and other villagers were asked not to have any contact with the couple’s family.


It was alleged that even before the elders’ meeting was held, some persons entered their house on June 7 and beat up everyone.


Only then did the couple get their marriage registered (on June 12). They feared an attack on the scale of the November 7, 2012 mob fury on Natham Colony (where Ilavarasan lived).


Sudha lodged police complaint on June 22.

The_Hindu
 
I really can not understand Tamil Nadu.

Non Brahmins in TN claim to be Dravidians..so why do they look down upon fellow Dalit Dravidians with such contempt and hatred?

If one can not love one's own country men..what is the use of making themselves come under 1 umbrella of Dravidianism??

It is simply sickening to read stories like the story above.
 
The facade of Dravidianism is only to put the native Brahmin down...


Dear Sir,

I have no idea if that is the only reason for Dravidianism but what I dislike is people call themselves Dravidians but are willing even to kill a fellow Dravidian Dalit.

So why even have the terminology Dravidian?

I feel most castes in TN are just concerned about themselves and give two hoots for the progress of the state or nation as a whole.
 
I really can not understand Tamil Nadu.

Non Brahmins in TN claim to be Dravidians..so why do they look down upon fellow Dalit Dravidians with such contempt and hatred?

If one can not love one's own country men..what is the use of making themselves come under 1 umbrella of Dravidianism??

It is simply sickening to read stories like the story above.

Smt. Renuka,

Caste superiority runs deep and strong in each caste. Here, since the boy belongs to vanniyar (a higher caste) and the girl is a dalit, the offence or crime may not be viewed as badly as the Ilavarasan case. The worst treatment is when a lower caste sperm will beget a child through a higher caste womb - i.e., pratiloma marriage of the Dharmasastras.

I think, if the boy's people are sensible, they will ask (compel) the couple to migrate anonymously to another state and town (in this case, Karnataka probably) and will do the necessary prAyascitta before the kaTTappanchAyat and also before the Mariyamman. Then those parents and others will be accepted until this renegade couple come back and enter the village again. This seems to be the usual course of events.
 
Dear Sir,

I have no idea if that is the only reason for Dravidianism but what I dislike is people call themselves Dravidians but are willing even to kill a fellow Dravidian Dalit.

So why even have the terminology Dravidian?

I feel most castes in TN are just concerned about themselves and give two hoots for the progress of the state or nation as a whole.

The DMK used the word Dravidian first to capitalize on the sentiment of tamilians, to exploit their gullibility to garner votes, win election, snatch power and amass wealth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top