• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Superior Sva Dharma

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sva-dharma is interpreted in many ways. Traditionally it is interpreted as being aligned to one’s own varna dharma or profession. Some would like to interpret it as one’s own dharma.

Here is my understanding of sva-dharma from Bhagavad Gita.

Chapter 3 Text 25-35


saktah karmany avidvamsoyatha kurvanti bharatakuryad vidvams tathasaktascikirsur loka-sangraham

The non-experts work clinging to their actions. The experts perform without clinging to their actions, wishing to hold/grasp the people.
It simply means non-experts do not change. Experts learn from their experience and change their actions, wishing to lead the people.

na buddhi-bhedam janayedajnanam karma-sanginamjosayet sarva-karmani vidvan yuktah samacaran

People not breaking the brains, remain attached to their actions ignorantly. People who wish/like be all all-acting (doing everything), perform in association with the learned

prakrteh kriyamananigunaih karmani sarvasahahankara-vimudhatmakartaham iti manyate

The Atma filled with ‘I’ (ego) simplistically thinks I am doing this. But all things happen due to the ‘gunas’ acting on the original nature (prakrti).


tattva-vit tu maha-bahoguna-karma-vibhagayohguna gunesu vartantaiti matva na sajjate

O mighty armed, one who knows the principles of guna-karma distribution, combination/interplay of different gunas, having known, does not allow their gunas to be affixed on their actions.


prakrter guna-sammudhahsajjante guna-karmasutan akrtsna-vido mandankrtsna-vin na vicalayet

Those all slow learners affix their gunas on their actions due to gunas simplistically acting on their original nature. Such people are of unsteady nature as all their actions carry the foot-print of their ‘gunas’. But who know all are steady.


mayi sarvani karmanisannyas adhyatma-cetasanirasir nirmamo bhutvayudhyasva vigata-jvarah
One who meditates/thinks on the Surpeme consciousness, gives up to me all actions. Without desire, without the ‘self’, (Oh Arjuna) fight without laziness.

ye me matam idam nityamanutisthanti manavahsraddhavanto 'nasuyantomucyante te 'pi karmabhih

Those human beings who follow always this thought of mine, devotedly without envy, they become free of their (binding with) actions.


ye tv etad abhyasuyantona anutisthanti me matamsarva-jnana-vimudhams tanviddhi nastan acetasah

Those out of envy do not follow this thought, confuse all knowledge, their ruin is set in motion unconsciously.


sadrsam cestate svasyahprakrter jnanavan apiprakrtim yanti bhutaninigrahah kim karisyati

Behavior resembling/similar their self is the prakrti (original nature) of the learned even. All beings go their original nature. What can restraint of original nature do..?


indriyasya indriyasya artheraga-dvesau vyavasthitautayor na vasam agacchettau hy asya paripanthinau

Senses, sensory objects cling/adhere to the Color of hate/dislike do not come under control become the blockers


sreyan sva-dharmo vigunahpara-dharmat sv-anusthitatsva-dharme nidhanam sreyahpara-dharmo bhayavahah

Superior is the Sva-dharma devoid of guNas than following a para dharma. Superiority resides in the sva-dharma. In the para-dharma it is fear.


Summary


As one could understand here, Krishna is talking about the original nature, Prakrti. But this prakrti or original nature present in every person.

The Gunas acquired through our senses and sensory objects colored by dislikes/hates corrupt the prakrti or our original nature.

Slow-learners/fools affix such Gunas (acquired) on all their actions. But people who know the guna-karma distribution, the interplay of gunas do not allow their gunas to be affixed on their actions.

Non-experts, affixing their gunas on their actions, cling to their actions. Experts who do not allow their gunas to be affixed in their actions, do not cling to their actions, instead holding to people or leading the people. So people who wish to do/achieve everything have experts associated with them.

Those who think of the Supreme consciousness, gives up to Him all their actions. Krishna is exhorting Arjuna to fight without laziness, without desire and without ‘mama’ or ‘I’.

Such people will get the ability to get rid of their gunas, perform with their original nature and won’t cling to their actions. (This can be best understood with Arjuna’s sva-dharma).

The learned has behavior adhering to their original nature. All beings go by their original nature. Restraint of original nature yields nothing.

In this context Krishna talks of Sva-dharma.

Sva-dharma means the dharma of the Self. Dharma are the Universal laws that change never. Sva-dharma are our own laws that we lay for ourselves. Para-dharma are the laws that others have defined for themselves.

These laws that we lay for ourselves are the best when they are not afflicted by the Gunas which are acquired by sensory perceptions colored by hates/dislikes and aligned to our original nature.

Hence Krishna says Superior is the sva-dharma devoid of gunas.

Arjuna’s Sva-dharma

What is the Sva-dharma or law that Arjuna has laid for himself..?

Arjuna’s sva-dharma is to fight against the opponents and defend his people in a war. He has exhibited it many times before.

When Arjuna was Brihannala in Virata and the Virata Kingdom was attacked by Kauravas, Arjuna revealed his true form to Uttara Kumara. He defended his friends and fought his opponents. That’s the law he defined for himself. That’s his sva-dharma which is aligned with his inner original nature, prakrti.

But now Arjuna is trying to follow some other dharma which is not akin to his nature, as his nature got colored by the Gunas caused through sensory perceptions in the battlefield. If Arjuna follows this other dharma and run away from battlefield, it will conflict with his inner nature and torment him in future.

If Arjuna runs away his running away action would have got stamped/affixed with the tamasic guna that he acquired. He would have have cling on to this action for ever in all future battlefields in similar situations. He can never come out of it.

Hence Krishna exhorts him to move away from following a nature not his own, but follow his own nature, follow his own laws, his sva-dharma.

At first look, Sva-dharma seems to be referring to Arjuna’s Varna dharma, which is how it is traditionally interpreted. But Krishna does not talk of Varna at all in these slokas.

Krishna talks of Prakrti (original nature), sensory perceptions and acquired Gunas. Krishna talks of our actions being un-affected by our acquired Gunas. In that context Krishna specifically says sva-dharma un-affected by Gunas is superior.

Even people of same Varna may have different sva-dharmas. Dharma’s sva-dharma is not the same as Arjuna’s sva-dharma. Arjuna and Bhima were always ready to fight for their friends and against their opponents.

Yudishtra was more accommodating. Yudhistra was more pliant to Kurus. He recommended cautious response when Susharma attacked and seized Virata, his host, while Bhima argued for war. When draupadi was molested by Kichaka, he tried to console her. That was Yudishtra’s sva-dharma.

When Kurus attacked Virata’s kingdom in his absence, Arjuna decided to fight the Kurus come what may. That was Arjuna’s sva-dharma.

Yudishtra should not be following Arjuna’s sva-dharma. It is Yudhistra’s role to counsel caution and provide sagely guidance, though he is a Kshatriya like Arjuna. If Yudhistra follows Arjuna’s sva-dharma, he will be a failure.

Arjuna should not be following Yudishtra’s sva-dharma. It is Arjuna’s role to fight against opponents and for his friends. If Arjuna follows Yudhistra’s sva-dharma he will be a failure.

One has to discover/define their sva-dharma in tune with their original nature unaffected the acquired Gunas.

Superior Sva-dharma

T
hus Sva- dharma are the rules/laws that we define/discover for ourselves. It is superior when they are are devoid of all gunas that we acquire due to sensory perceptions. It has to be aligned to one’s own original nature.

Following such a sva-dharma is superior, as it is aligned with original nature. Copying the dharma of others causes fear as it conflicts with our nature and torments us.

-TBT
 
Last edited:
How are we supposed to apply this to our lives? What are we supposed to do differently?
Superior means comparison of some sorts. I have no idea what is being compared that is relevant now.
 
How are we supposed to apply this to our lives? What are we supposed to do differently?
Superior means comparison of some sorts. I have no idea what is being compared that is relevant now.

Dear a-TB,

In the modern context, one can understand it as one's duties and responsibilities in whatever capacity one is acting. As a soldier, one's responsibility is to kill the enemy but as a doctor one has to save a person. Sva dharma is superior when it corresponds to a higher duty and responsibility. For example the sva dharma of a Prime minster is superior to the sva dharma of a soldier.

But the moot point is whether people who are in a job have natural inclinations for it because sva dharma is aligned with one's natural inclinations and has a spiritual basis.
 
How are we supposed to apply this to our lives? What are we supposed to do differently?
Superior means comparison of some sorts. I have no idea what is being compared that is relevant now.

Shri a-TB,

All these are mere blah, blah, blah, because our modern self-proclaimed brahmins are trying to "re-interpret" the sva dharma idea of the BG to suit their own conscience. In the process, their attempt becomes like the proverb, பிள்ளையார் பிடிக்கப் போய் குரங்கா முடிந்ததாம் (piḷḷaiyār piṭikkap poy kuraṅkā muṭintatām =attempted to make an idol of ganesh, but ended up with a monkey's!).

According to the BG concept of swadharma, most of us TBs participating here are either fallen (ostracisable) brahmins or Sudras or even worse if the person is corrupt also!
 
How are we supposed to apply this to our lives? What are we supposed to do differently?
Superior means comparison of some sorts. I have no idea what is being compared that is relevant now.

It's very simple.

1. Ensure your original nature is not affected by the Gunas that you acquire. It's tough. Retain as much as possible your nature. What is your original nature is to be determined by you. Ensure you are not swayed from your original nature due to external influences from time to time.

2. Ensure that such gunas are not affixed on your actions or seen in your actions. Your actions should align with your original nature.

3. Perform actions without the self, without desire, without clouded by hates that cling to your sensory perceptions, dedicating the result to that Supreme consciousness.

Most modern philosophies stress on this 'Be Yourself', 'Positive thinking', 'Being goal oriented' etc.. That's almost a similar advice that Krishna gave to Arjuna.

-TBT
 
It's very simple.

1. Ensure your original nature is not affected by the Gunas that you acquire. It's tough. Retain as much as possible your nature. What is your original nature is to be determined by you. Ensure you are not swayed from your original nature due to external influences from time to time.

2. Ensure that such gunas are not affixed on your actions or seen in your actions. Your actions should align with your original nature.

3. Perform actions without the self, without desire, without clouded by hates that cling to your sensory perceptions, dedicating the result to that Supreme consciousness.

Most modern philosophies stress on this 'Be Yourself', 'Positive thinking', 'Being goal oriented' etc.. That's almost a similar advice that Krishna gave to Arjuna.

-TBT


Dear Sir,

1)Gunas you acquire? Isn't Gunas oriented to time,place and person and present in varying proportions in each individual?

We all function with Gunas on daily basis..without Gunas we can't live.

For example..in the early morning when we havent gone to work yet and just woken up ..we are still very much Sattva Guna..calm and composed..Endorphins based.

Then we become Raja Guna when work starts becos Rajas is needed for us to get into action.Rajas Guna is mainly adrenaline/cortisol based.

Then by evening we wind down and body prepares to go into rest and sleep mode and levels of melatonin rise to make us sleep..our sense are dulled by night and we sleep...that is Tamo Guna.

Therefore Gunas themselves have an endocrinal background and it works in concert to make life even possible.

The problem arises when an imbalance happens becos of either a hormonal screw up or circumstances,stress or a combination of all.

Personally I feel there is no reason to "fear" Gunas ruling us.

Gunas are meant to be used..interestingly in Malay the word Guna means "to use"..so I feel we can use our Gunas wisely for each situation knowingly or unknowingly for a balanced life.

Lets take the Bhagavad Geeta scenario..Arjuna was despondent..depressed.had anxiety..could not face his kith or kin..well may be he was attached to his own kind or he was just stressed out..a burn out stress syndrome with total depletion of serotonin in his brain..he after all had led a very stressful life..exiled into the forest..hiding one year ..living as an eunuch..then had to do tapas to get the Pashupatha weapon..but he did get some time to get some side kicks like Ulupi to have fun with!LOL

Then when the exile was over he had to wage a war to get back the kingdom cos Duryodhana did not keep his word and refused to part with even a needles point worth of land.

So frankly speaking..how can anyone be mentally fit for a war when he had been tru so much?

So he was actually depressed! May be he was NOT even attached to his kith and kin..he was just stressed out....a depressed person tries to find the slightest excuse to run away from any stressful situation citing all sorts of reasons.

Krishna would have known this and motivated Arjuna to fight..instead of an anti depressant tablet ..Krishna gave Arjuna psychotherapy to face the situation.Krishna did not tell Arjuna to fight for the sake of proving a point but He told Arjuna how to identify his true nature and to live along those lines.

Arjuna was Rajo Guna Sattva Guna combination by nature..so he had to work along those lines to face life and not run away from it..part of his journey of life was war and battle.

So Krishna did not force Arjuna to fight..He only reminded Arjuna that fighting is Arjuna's swadharma for that situation.

Now for fighting one needs Rajo Guna and to be an intelligent fighter who can strategize one needs Sattva Guna.

Technically Gunas become affixed and seen in our actions..but the trick is to treat the Gunas like instruments and put them down when we do not need them and take them up when we need them.

Gunas are an integral part of our actions but it should be kept in the right balance with accordance with our nature.
 
Last edited:
Dear a-TB,

In the modern context, one can understand it as one's duties and responsibilities in whatever capacity one is acting. As a soldier, one's responsibility is to kill the enemy but as a doctor one has to save a person. Sva dharma is superior when it corresponds to a higher duty and responsibility. For example the sva dharma of a Prime minster is superior to the sva dharma of a soldier.

But the moot point is whether people who are in a job have natural inclinations for it because sva dharma is aligned with one's natural inclinations and has a spiritual basis.

Mr Sravana:
The question still is there. In today's world where we choose our profession to make a living how is this teaching useful
 
Shri a-TB,

All these are mere blah, blah, blah, because our modern self-proclaimed brahmins are trying to "re-interpret" the sva dharma idea of the BG to suit their own conscience. In the process, their attempt becomes like the proverb, பிள்ளையார் பிடிக்கப் போய் குரங்கா முடிந்ததாம் (piḷḷaiyār piṭikkap poy kuraṅkā muṭintatām =attempted to make an idol of ganesh, but ended up with a monkey's!).

According to the BG concept of swadharma, most of us TBs participating here are either fallen (ostracisable) brahmins or Sudras or even worse if the person is corrupt also!

Thank you, Mr Sangom. I do not know if the re-interpretation even makes sense.
 
It's very simple.

1. Ensure your original nature is not affected by the Gunas that you acquire. It's tough. Retain as much as possible your nature. What is your original nature is to be determined by you. Ensure you are not swayed from your original nature due to external influences from time to time.

2. Ensure that such gunas are not affixed on your actions or seen in your actions. Your actions should align with your original nature.

3. Perform actions without the self, without desire, without clouded by hates that cling to your sensory perceptions, dedicating the result to that Supreme consciousness.

Most modern philosophies stress on this 'Be Yourself', 'Positive thinking', 'Being goal oriented' etc.. That's almost a similar advice that Krishna gave to Arjuna.

-TBT

Mr TBT:
Is it really simple when the words used do not convey anything meaningful and useful in today's world.



Your first point> I have no idea what my original nature is. What is your nature, how did you measure it? Why should I acquire gunas and then why should I make sure I am not swayed. Are all gunas bad?? The entire point is meaningless blah-blah. I am sorry but you cannot use vague things and say it is simple


Your third point> When I decide to go to a work place I intend to make money in return. Do you go to work without desire to earn a living?? Why should I dedicate to a supreme consciousness - it never came to ask me for that. I hope Gita has a real message than this blah blah. Again I am sorry for being blunt. And you practice all this saying it is simple ?
 
Mr Sravana:
The question still is there. In today's world where we choose our profession to make a living how is this teaching useful

Yes a-TB, we choose a profession to make a living. That is the most basic fulfilment that a profession offers us. Beyond that there are emotional, intellectual and spiritual fulfilments that a job can offer. As the profession moves from satisfying one's physical needs to up to one's spiritual needs the fulfilments keep growing. As the higher level needs are satisfied it would imply that your profession is more aligned with your nature.
 
Thank you, Mr Sangom. I do not know if the re-interpretation even makes sense.

All these convoluted mis (or, re-) interpretations have one ulterior motive, viz., to somehow establish that these mis-(re-) interpretors do not lose their brAhmaNa status which they got by birth only and not by the application of any of the definitions in the BG itself. This Forum thus benefits indirectly! LOL
 
Mr TBT:
Is it really simple when the words used do not convey anything meaningful and useful in today's world.



Your first point> I have no idea what my original nature is. What is your nature, how did you measure it? Why should I acquire gunas and then why should I make sure I am not swayed. Are all gunas bad?? The entire point is meaningless blah-blah. I am sorry but you cannot use vague things and say it is simple


Your third point> When I decide to go to a work place I intend to make money in return. Do you go to work without desire to earn a living?? Why should I dedicate to a supreme consciousness - it never came to ask me for that. I hope Gita has a real message than this blah blah. Again I am sorry for being blunt. And you practice all this saying it is simple ?


Hmm..

It is not in the words one says, but in the meaning one makes.

1. What your original nature is to be decided by you.

As in the Sanyasi and Scorpion story, everyone has an original nature. Your actions have to align to that original nature. That is svadharma.

Many times, we indeed look at others, try to emulate other's habits and behaviors. We move away from our original nature, trying to act like someone else.

As Oscar wilde said "Be yourself. Every one else is already taken".

Now, to make use of it, one has to understand oneself. If you do not understand or do not want to understand, every writing is a blah-blah. Vague or clear is not in the words being said, but in the meaning being made out.

2. In my experience, if you work with the 'desire' to earn money, either you will not earn money or it will not last long. You work with happiness and satisfaction in doing whatever you do. You may chose such a work that will earn you a lot of money or earn a lot of respect or earn a lot of knowledge. But you don't work for earning money.

You work for and with happiness and satisfaction. Then you will be successful.

When you work with satisfaction, great excitement and joy, you are dedicating your actions to supreme consciousness. You are ready to take any result and progress further. Your satisfaction is already there.

I have not seen anyone who did great things by their desire to do something. People achieve great things when they do things with happiness, satisfaction, joy and contentment.

3. Hence it is indeed simple. Gita is a treasure of knowledge, for those who know to use it.

http://nuerons.blogspot.in/2011/12/every-moment-newbie-happy-2012.html


-TBT
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Latest ads

Back
Top