Though this is a archa mavu discussion, let me clarify once again..
North India was always under persian influence for 1000s of years with pockets of tribals & in some places dravidians holding sway. Even during Alexander conquest, Persian King Darius controlled most of North of India. That’s why the western researchers called “South India” as the ”Original Hindu Country”..
That’s why the North Indian Hindu & Muslim look exactly the same, same skin color, same features, etc.. & speak the same language – Hindi = Urdu, have same traditions – Mehendi event is held by both North Hindus & muslims, Holi festival = Eid e Gulabi festival of the Mughals, etc..
Most importantly the Aryan language Sanskrit is not found anywhere in the North, it is found only in South of India, & inscribed in all parts of South East Asia – Indonesia, Thailand, Cambodia, Malaysia, Ceylon, etc.. In south Brahmins, Sanskrit is a family tradition, with grantha leafs, etc.. & by all eastern & western researchers, Sanskrit was written in Grantha script all through history & only from 19[SUP]th[/SUP] century, Hindi script was used by all.
Anyways, we are supposed to believe that despite both the people looking exactly the same, speak exactly the same language, exactly the same festivals, one is a Mughal descendant & the other Aryan from Central Asia … LOL !!!!!!!!!!!
And that the Mughal descendant is very very bad, & that Central Asian Aryan descendant is very very good..!!! LOL !!!
Astonishing… I mean, it is beyond hilarious !!