let me start with replies for both revathi and valli , which i feel i am owed.
as a preamble, i would request posters here to be polite. mastery of english is not a requirement but mastery of manners is a must.otherwise teacher praveen will be forced to use the perambu again
valli quote 'Very very true. But as far as the cases I know the boys didn't consider the wives as Trophies just because they were brahmins and also they didn't love the girls for the same reason. But yes, they consider their wives as trophies because not many boys happen to get to marry the love of their life and live a successful married life with her!! '
very true valli. my one close girl relative had a love marriage (iyer boy ofcourse, 30 years ago, but a dashing suave and fast talking bloke, who literally swept her off her feet). any time after the marriage, she would not brook any comment or what she perceived as criticism of her lover husband and the she-tiger in her would leap with fury. 30 years later, on the cusp of old age, it is so cute, to see them still so luvvy duvvy, and each other's eyes light up when they find themselves in a crowd. seldom have i found the zing and heart flutter that love marriages appear to invoke. over time.
valli quote 'I suppose that this question is intended for parents who seek alliance for their children. I am not one of those parents! I would expect my boy to find his own girl. I would also give him advice not to postpone it for too long. I don't want him to be one of those nerds (who know nothing but studying, getting A++ and landing in a high income job) who look down for many years into books only to look up and find that all the suitable girls are gone!! If he is unlucky enough not to get a girl/bride till he turns 30+ then I would have to take the help of matrimonial columns. And in that situation me or my boy who has turned 30+ CANNOT afford to be choosy!'
valli, my children have all told me that they will do their hunting. which is ok with me, after all it is their life, and no one wants to be self destructive. the marriage market is among the most darwinian of all transaction oriented activities. we are forever evaluating our 'worth' with what we will get for it. this is the same whether it be arranged or love type. what changes is the participants. but the essence of evaluation is the same: looks, earning capacity, prospects, character and compatibility. the last factor has more weightage in a love marriage for obvious reasons. where i live, social ostracism is non existent. in india, in urban chennai, i doubt if anyone cares. it may be different in the rural areas.
revathi quote 'I have seen both in kannadiga Smarthas' house and other friends house- who are brahmins various Northern states - not in the habit of following this.
This is just a simple example - where it involves day to day adjustment.
So I personally, if given a choice, would be hesitant to live in that atmosphere.As simple as that. This does not mean that they are superior and we are inferior and vice versa.Various fights between MIL and DIL originate from silly reasons on how to cut Brinjal! Why to bring in unwanted problems in life sir?'
revathi, at the start of any marriage, there is a period of discovery, i think. in arranged marriages, some aspects of the compatibility particularly socio cultural ones are considered. but no one knows the house habits, and many surprises invariably follow. usually it is the girl that gets hit with it, unless ofcourse thani kudhithanam, where it is the husband. the west solution is to have 'live in' ie set up a household without the benefit of formal marriage, which may or may not follow.
each one has its own merits.
also, i would like to comment on RVR's observations that indian marriages are among the best held together in the world. i agree that indian unions are the best glued together.
more than that, it is upto the individual to make an assessment. personally i am skeptical as to how many are 'successful' by modern definition of a partner, doing things together, sharing and having a zing in their marriage. when you have a mamiyar staring over your shoulders, there is no chance for an oodal and huddling into the bedroom only brings unwanted attention.
again, i am not putting any values to the above disparity or judging which is better. it is just that these are two different types of institutions and one cannot compare apples to oranges just because they are both fruits.
so to sum, we are talking of different terms of marriage unions.
furthermore, indian society is fast changing. if there are more divorces, i would not consider that we have abandoned a once golden formula. not at all. it is just that the terms of reference has changed. which i think is for the better. also it is inevitable. can anyone here figure out how to turn back the clock?
thank you.
as a preamble, i would request posters here to be polite. mastery of english is not a requirement but mastery of manners is a must.otherwise teacher praveen will be forced to use the perambu again
valli quote 'Very very true. But as far as the cases I know the boys didn't consider the wives as Trophies just because they were brahmins and also they didn't love the girls for the same reason. But yes, they consider their wives as trophies because not many boys happen to get to marry the love of their life and live a successful married life with her!! '
very true valli. my one close girl relative had a love marriage (iyer boy ofcourse, 30 years ago, but a dashing suave and fast talking bloke, who literally swept her off her feet). any time after the marriage, she would not brook any comment or what she perceived as criticism of her lover husband and the she-tiger in her would leap with fury. 30 years later, on the cusp of old age, it is so cute, to see them still so luvvy duvvy, and each other's eyes light up when they find themselves in a crowd. seldom have i found the zing and heart flutter that love marriages appear to invoke. over time.
valli quote 'I suppose that this question is intended for parents who seek alliance for their children. I am not one of those parents! I would expect my boy to find his own girl. I would also give him advice not to postpone it for too long. I don't want him to be one of those nerds (who know nothing but studying, getting A++ and landing in a high income job) who look down for many years into books only to look up and find that all the suitable girls are gone!! If he is unlucky enough not to get a girl/bride till he turns 30+ then I would have to take the help of matrimonial columns. And in that situation me or my boy who has turned 30+ CANNOT afford to be choosy!'
valli, my children have all told me that they will do their hunting. which is ok with me, after all it is their life, and no one wants to be self destructive. the marriage market is among the most darwinian of all transaction oriented activities. we are forever evaluating our 'worth' with what we will get for it. this is the same whether it be arranged or love type. what changes is the participants. but the essence of evaluation is the same: looks, earning capacity, prospects, character and compatibility. the last factor has more weightage in a love marriage for obvious reasons. where i live, social ostracism is non existent. in india, in urban chennai, i doubt if anyone cares. it may be different in the rural areas.
revathi quote 'I have seen both in kannadiga Smarthas' house and other friends house- who are brahmins various Northern states - not in the habit of following this.
This is just a simple example - where it involves day to day adjustment.
So I personally, if given a choice, would be hesitant to live in that atmosphere.As simple as that. This does not mean that they are superior and we are inferior and vice versa.Various fights between MIL and DIL originate from silly reasons on how to cut Brinjal! Why to bring in unwanted problems in life sir?'
revathi, at the start of any marriage, there is a period of discovery, i think. in arranged marriages, some aspects of the compatibility particularly socio cultural ones are considered. but no one knows the house habits, and many surprises invariably follow. usually it is the girl that gets hit with it, unless ofcourse thani kudhithanam, where it is the husband. the west solution is to have 'live in' ie set up a household without the benefit of formal marriage, which may or may not follow.
each one has its own merits.
also, i would like to comment on RVR's observations that indian marriages are among the best held together in the world. i agree that indian unions are the best glued together.
more than that, it is upto the individual to make an assessment. personally i am skeptical as to how many are 'successful' by modern definition of a partner, doing things together, sharing and having a zing in their marriage. when you have a mamiyar staring over your shoulders, there is no chance for an oodal and huddling into the bedroom only brings unwanted attention.
again, i am not putting any values to the above disparity or judging which is better. it is just that these are two different types of institutions and one cannot compare apples to oranges just because they are both fruits.
so to sum, we are talking of different terms of marriage unions.
furthermore, indian society is fast changing. if there are more divorces, i would not consider that we have abandoned a once golden formula. not at all. it is just that the terms of reference has changed. which i think is for the better. also it is inevitable. can anyone here figure out how to turn back the clock?
thank you.