Renuka,
Do you agree that mind is more powerful than the body and jivatma is more powerful than the mind , the Atman being the most powerful. If thinking at the level of physical and mental reality we are able to create Artificial Intelligence and Artificial life, why cannot jivatma will the creation of living being?
Yes Renuka, I agree that the power of the jivatma is limited by its karma. It is not all powerful as the Atman but it does have enormous power, definitely the power to project the physical self because without such projection even karma cannot be carried out .
Folks,
I do not understand this talk about power and ego. Where in this thread am I talking about my power? There is a handful of you who seem to always want to talk about my power irrespective of whatever I write.
Folks,
I do not understand this talk about power and ego. Where in this thread am I talking about my power? There is a handful of you who seem to always want to talk about my power irrespective of whatever I write.
Dear Renu,......... Come on yaar..tell me did I miss out anything else?.......
Dear Renuka, Shri Vaagmi, Smt.JJ, Shri a-TB,
I am really not talking about my power to boast. I am only sharing something that is interesting and make you inquisitive about such abilities. At least I am getting interested in that. Hope you understand. If it seems to project ego, I can definitely say ego is not an issue I am grappling with.
Sorry I apologise to any one who might be offended by my comments . What the scientists have accomplished is of equal importance to what was accomplished in the past. In my wiser posts I tried to maintain they are just different routes to the same truth.Sravna...if you say so then I can accept it but when you start running down science calling scientist half baked etc..all that comes across as Pride...this is when I ask for evidence becos to back up your claims that spirituality is full baked you need to have evidence of the cookies you placed in the oven.
Sorry I apologise to any one who might be offended by my comments . What the scientists have accomplished is of equal importance to what was accomplished in the past. In my wiser posts I tried to maintain they are just different routes to the same truth.
Dear Sravna...
There is no need to apologize...its not a crime.
I truly agree that one can gain knowledge from a different dimension.
Many great scientists have had dreams that helped them get an answer to findings for eg Dr James Watson had a dream of two intertwined serpents that led to finding the structure of the Double Stranded DNA.
Mathematician Ramanujan had visions about his theories from a Goddess of Namagiri.
So its entirely possible to log into the cosmos and download knowledge and use it for the scientific advancement of mankind.
Just imagine now..we have virtual reality internet..Cloud..Drive to store data.
May be the macrocosm too functions like a Cloud..after all we do have the terminology Akhashic Records for Karma.
May be all of us have a username and password coded in our subtle body..who knows.
So you see science can be considered microcosm.
Spirituality the macrocosm.
What forms the bridge?
Could it be Prana?
Think about it.
Dear Renuka, Shri Vaagmi, Smt.JJ, Shri a-TB,
I am really not talking about my power to boast. I am only sharing something that is interesting and make you inquisitive about such abilities. At least I am getting interested in that. Hope you understand. If it seems to project ego, I can definitely say ego is not an issue I am grappling with.
Dear Mr Sravana:
What I said and will say now is tough love .. You can go back and look at all the threads you have opened in just one year. You have several active threads in the chat section on the same topic. What is this obsession to create two more here? If you knew science and showed off that would be called arrogance. So it is not arrogance.
But you are taking credit for some mumbo-jumbo nonsense and even equating that with science. I do not know science and even if you had a science degree, you and I are pretty much clueless.
You have been very 'clever' to come here and claim some super thinking in the name of propagating yourself in some pretext. It is about propagating your imagined power all along .
A person with a healthy self esteem will not do this. Think about it .
Dear Shri a-TB,
I do not know how to respond to this. I think we are at different wavelengths. All I can say is the platitude, if you think what I am writing is nonsense you are free to ignore it.
Dear Shri a-TB,
I stand by what I said in my previous post. What some people find as trash may be treasure to some other and vice versa. There is no reason to take the opinion of a vociferous few as the opinion of the members as a whole. I am sure sure at least a few would have found the alternate thinking that I espouse to be of practical use. Some repetition of ideas cannot be avoided and are in fact useful to drive home what i say.
I also suggest to those who disagree with my views or the content to present the logic to support their criticisms and not be vague in their disagreements.
Dear Sravna...you always evade questions and never answer any.
For eg..you said you had scriptures as back up..yet.you did not name which scripture..which stanza etc.
Everything you write is based on your perception..than you say you havent completed it yet and request others to be patient.
Its the same reel you play.
When anyone asks you for evidence you claim the onus is on others to prove it..thats totally modus operandi of the " fraudulent"..even though I am not calling you a fraud.
BTW why do you ask logic from others when you havent presented any logic?