• Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Vaishnava janato tene kahiye je...

Status
Not open for further replies.
JR

JR

Hare Krishna
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4YqgR5D7dM

Vaishnava (devotees of Lord Vishnu) people are those who,
Feel the pain of others,
Help those who are in misery,
But never let ego or conceit enter their mind.

Vaishnavas, respect the entire world,
Do not censure anyone,
Keep their words, actions and thoughts pure,
The mother of such a soul is blessed.

Vaishnavas see all equally, renounce greed and avarice,
Respect women as they respect their own mother,
Their tongue never utters false words,
Their hands would never touch the wealth of another.

Vaishnavas do not succumb to worldly attachments,
They are detached from worldly pleasures,
They are enticed by the name of God (Shri Ram),
All holy sites of pilgrimage are embodied within them.

Vaishnavas encompasses the absence of greed and deceit,
They have renounced all types of lust and anger,
The author of this poem (Narsi) would be grateful to meet such a soul,
Whose virtue liberates their entire lineage.

Composer Narasimha Mehta:
narsinhmehta.jpg


https://indiansaints.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/sant-narasinh-mehta/
 
JR said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4YqgR5D7dM

Vaishnava (devotees of Lord Vishnu) people are those who,
Feel the pain of others,
Help those who are in misery,
But never let ego or conceit enter their mind.

Vaishnavas, respect the entire world,
Do not censure anyone,
Keep their words, actions and thoughts pure,
The mother of such a soul is blessed.

Vaishnavas see all equally, renounce greed and avarice,
Respect women as they respect their own mother,
Their tongue never utters false words,
Their hands would never touch the wealth of another.

Vaishnavas do not succumb to worldly attachments,
They are detached from worldly pleasures,
They are enticed by the name of God (Shri Ram),
All holy sites of pilgrimage are embodied within them.

Vaishnavas encompasses the absence of greed and deceit,
They have renounced all types of lust and anger,
The author of this poem (Narsi) would be grateful to meet such a soul,
Whose virtue liberates their entire lineage.

Composer Narasimha Mehta:

narsinhmehta.jpg


https://indiansaints.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/sant-narasinh-mehta/
Click to expand...

Smt. JR ji,

This translation given above, of the popular song "vaishnav jan to tene kahiye..." made more famous by Mahatma Gandhi, is slightly incorrect. The song says 'tene kahiye jo peed paraayee jaaNe re" which means "call him (that parson) as a vaishnava who can understand the pain (peed) of others". It does not mean, as you have said, "Vaishnava (devotees of Lord Vishnu) people are those who,
Feel the pain of others,"

Each subsequent sentence/stanza goes in the same vein and finally, the great Narsi Mehta says, "ભણે નરસૈયો તેનું દર્શન કરતાં કુળ એકોતેર તાર્યાં રે. ॥૪॥" and this portion means " If Narasaiya gets his Darsan (i.e., Darsan of such a vaishnava) the whole kula (lineage) will cross re! (meaning, if Narasaiya could get the Darsan of such a true vaishnava, then Narasaiya's kula or entire lineage would be able to cross (this samsaara)).

The song is not a paean on vaishnavas as is sought to be made out.
 
Sangom ji,

Yes you are right Sir. The meaning given in Wikipedia (the one in OP that you quoted) is indeed not accurate. A 'Vaishnava' by definition (in my understanding) is in general 'a great devotee', endowed with the virtues of patience, humility, tolerance, free of avarice, and non-violent. He or she need not necessarily only be devotee of Vishnu.

However, I chose to cling to the same Wiki meaning for this OP for 2 reasons:

i) To educate some members who always claim Lord Shiva to be supreme over Sri Vishnu, how it feels to be on the 'receiving end' of similar perspective from Vishnu bhaktas. (I can cite example of this attitude from a recent posting in 1 famous thread well known for spreading message of hatred and intolerance each day).

ii) It is very rare to come across such a Vaishnava as given in Shri. Narasimha Mehta's song. But, that the fundamental philosophy of Vaishnavam is not just to do pujas to Sri Vishnu, but build on a solid foundation of high principles of conduct and character is its aim.

I thank you very much for taking your time to read this OP. Your insight is truly appreciated.
 
பூதம் யான் எனது செருக்கு ராம நாம மகிமை

பூதம் யான் எனது செருக்கு ராம நாம மகிமை

Sharing a very interesting Story




lord-rama.jpg



பூதம் கொடுத்த தொல்லை!

ஒரு மனிதன் துஷ்ட தேவதைகளை வழிபட்டான். எதற்காக? தனக்கு வேண்டிய எல்லாவற்றையும் முடித்துக் கொடுக்க ஒரு பூதம் தேவை என்பதற்காக. அவன் செய்த தவம் பலித்தது. பூதமும் அவன் முன்னால் தோன்றியது.

பூதம் சொன்னது, “தலைவனே கட்டளை இடு. கண் மூடித் திறப்பதற்குள் காரியத்தை முடித்து விடுவேன். ஆனால்………… ஒரே ஒரு நிபந்தனை………………. என்னால் சும்மா மட்டும் இருக்க முடியாது. நீ வேலை எதுவும் கொடுக்காவிடில் உன்னையே விழுங்கி விடுவேன்”. இதைக் கேட்ட அந்த மனிதனுக்கு ஒரே சந்தோஷம். வேலை கொடுப்பதா கஷ்டம்? நிறைய வேலைகளைக் கொடுப்போம் என்று எண்ணினான்.

எனக்கு ஒரு மாளிகையைக் கட்டிக் கொடு என்றான். அடுத்த பத்து நிமிடத்தில் பிரம்மாண்டமான அரண்மனை அங்கே வந்துவிட்டது! இதைச் சுற்றி ஒரு சாலை போடு என்றான். அதையும் பூதம் நொடிப் பொழுதில் நிறை வேற்றி விட்டது! இதற்கு என்ன வேலை கொடுப்பது என்று அந்த மனிதன் திகைக்கத் துவங்கினான். உடனே பெரிய நகரத்தை உருவாக்கு என்றான். அதையும் பத்து நிமிடத்தில் முடித்துவிட்டு அடுத்த வேலை என்ன என்று கேட்டது.

அந்த மனிதனுக்கு பயம் வந்துவிட்டது. வேலை கொடுக்காவிடில் பூதம் விழுங்கி விடுமே என்று மரண பயம் தொற்றிக் கொண்டது. அருகில் ஒரு சந்யாசி இருந்தார். ஓடிப் போய் அவர் காலில் விழுந்தான். ஏதேனும் ஒரு வழி சொல்லி என்னைக் காப்பாற்றுங்கள் என்று கெஞ்சினான்.

அவர் ஒரு நல்ல யோசனை கொடுத்தார். அதோ இருக்கிறது பார்! ஒரு பெரிய மூங்கில் கம்பு. அதை பூமியில் நடச் சொல் மேலும் கீழும் ஏறி இறங்கி வரச் சொல் நான் ‘நிறுத்து’ என்று சொல்லும் வரை இப்படிச் செய்து கொண்டே இரு என்று பூதத்துக்கு உத்தரவிடு என்றார் அந்த சந்யாசி.

அந்த மனிதனும் பூதத்துக்கு அவ்வாறே உத்தரவிட்டான். அது கம்பத்தை நட்டு மேலும் கீழும் ஏறி இறங்கி வந்து அலுத்துச் சலித்து விட்டது. நாளடைவில் ஒரு நாள் தப்பித்தோம் பிழைத்தோம் என்று எண்ணிக் கொண்டு சொல்லாமல் கொள்ளாமல் ஓடிப் போய்விட்டது!

உங்களுக்கு ராம நாமம் தான் அந்த மூங்கில் கம்பம். உங்களை வாட்டி வதைக்கும் அஹம்காரம்தான்—- ( யான் எனது என்னும் செருக்கு=வள்ளுவன் குறள்) ——அந்த பூதம். அதை ராம நாமம் என்னும் கம்பத்தின் மீது ஏறி இறங்க உத்தரவிடுங்கள். உங்கள் அஹம்காரத்தை அழிக்க வந்தது ராம நாமம் தான். அதை சொன்னால் யான் எனது என்னும் செருக்கு தானாக ஓடிப் போய்விடும்.

வள்ளுவனும் இதை அழகாகக் கூறுகிறான். வள்ளுவன் ஒரு பெரிய சம்ஸ்கிருத அறிஞன். வடமொழியில் உள்ள பகவத் கீதையிலும், மனு தர்ம சாஸ்திரத்திலும், மஹா பாரதத்திலும், தர்ம சாஸ்திரங்களிலும் உள்ள விஷயங்களை பல குறள்களில் சொல் பிசகாமல், வரி பிறழாமல் மொழி பெயர்க்கிறான்!

யான் எனது என்னும் செருக்கு அறுப்பான் வானோர்க்கு
உயர்ந்த உலகம் புகும் (குறள் 346, அதிகாரம் துறவு) — என்பது வள்ளுவன் வாய்மொழி.
பொருள்: அஹம்காரம், மமகாரம் இரண்டையும் அழிப்பவர்களுக்கு – அகந்தையைக் கைவிட்டவர்களுக்கு — தேவலோகத்துக்கும் மேலான மோக்ஷம் கிடைக்கும். அதாவது வீடு பேறு அடைய சுருக்குவழிப் பாதை!

நாமும் ராமன் புகழ் பாடுவோம்.

ஆனந்தாஸ்ரமம் சுவாமி ராம்தாஸ் சொன்ன கதைகளை

தமிழில் தருபவர் லண்டன் சுவாமிநாதன்


கட்டுரை எண்:- 960 தேதி:- 7 April 2014

http://swamiindology.blogspot.in/2014/04/blog-post_7.html
 
JR said:
Sangom ji,

Yes you are right Sir. The meaning given in Wikipedia (the one in OP that you quoted) is indeed not accurate. A 'Vaishnava' by definition (in my understanding) is in general 'a great devotee', endowed with the virtues of patience, humility, tolerance, free of avarice, and non-violent. He or she need not necessarily only be devotee of Vishnu.

However, I chose to cling to the same Wiki meaning for this OP for 2 reasons:

i) To educate some members who always claim Lord Shiva to be supreme over Sri Vishnu, how it feels to be on the 'receiving end' of similar perspective from Vishnu bhaktas. (I can cite example of this attitude from a recent posting in 1 famous thread well known for spreading message of hatred and intolerance each day).

ii) It is very rare to come across such a Vaishnava as given in Shri. Narasimha Mehta's song. But, that the fundamental philosophy of Vaishnavam is not just to do pujas to Sri Vishnu, but build on a solid foundation of high principles of conduct and character is its aim.

I thank you very much for taking your time to read this OP. Your insight is truly appreciated.
Click to expand...

Smt. JR ji,

Though I am not a scholar (in anything!) I feel that no saint or Acharya or great person has praised his/her own brand of God (either Siva or Vishnu) by deriding the other; in the case of smaarthas like myself, Vishnu/Krishna and other such Vishnu-linked names are very common. (My younger brother is named Krishnamurthy while my late chithappa was Padmanabhan.) On the contrary, if at all we are unbiased, you will agree that it may not be possible to find anyone with names like Sankara Iyengar, Subramanya Iyengar or even Sankara narayana Iyengar.

Stories - concocted by human minds - abound on either side of the fence; stories which depict Siva to be superior to Vishnu and vice versa, but let us not be misled by such man-made stories. Ultimately, i.e., after death, we have a complete void and no one, not even Nachiketas, could gain knowledge about after-death from even Yama himself.

This being the reality which has evolved over time (reasons for such a thing may be many and none of us may be able to categorically say why something happened in a particular way.), I will say that projecting Vaishnavism as something far superior to all other schools of philosophy, initiates the friction—at least in this forum.

In this 21st. century after Christ (lo! we great Indians do not have even our own time-frame reckoner and have to depend on the Abrahamists!) all these philosophies like Advaita, Dvaita, Visishtadvaita, etc., have lost their relevance, if any and Man is struggling to cope with the rapid technological advances being made and preparing himself for the eventuality when the earth itself may become completely inhospitable due to water shortage and oxygen shortage. None of these philosophies or religions will be able to do anything in such an eventualities. So, let us take care to bring up our children as much uninfected by religion and religious bigotry as possible, so that they don't fight each other on such flimsy grounds. That is my view.

I am sorry if anything written above is not to your liking.
 
sangom said:
Smt. JR ji,

This translation given above, of the popular song "vaishnav jan to tene kahiye..." made more famous by Mahatma Gandhi, is slightly incorrect. The song says 'tene kahiye jo peed paraayee jaaNe re" which means "call him (that parson) as a vaishnava who can understand the pain (peed) of others". It does not mean, as you have said, "Vaishnava (devotees of Lord Vishnu) people are those who,
Feel the pain of others,"

Each subsequent sentence/stanza goes in the same vein and finally, the great Narsi Mehta says, "ભણે નરસૈયો તેનું દર્શન કરતાં કુળ એકોતેર તાર્યાં રે. ॥૪॥" and this portion means " If Narasaiya gets his Darsan (i.e., Darsan of such a vaishnava) the whole kula (lineage) will cross re! (meaning, if Narasaiya could get the Darsan of such a true vaishnava, then Narasaiya's kula or entire lineage would be able to cross (this samsaara)).

The song is not a paean on vaishnavas as is sought to be made out.
Click to expand...

Narsi Mehta chose the proper name vaishnav janato and that must have a reason. He did not choose any other proper name like for instance saiva janato or gujarati janato. That must have a reason and it can not be papered over.
 
Dear PJ ji,

Thank you for this above message.

It is said that Lord Shiva recites the Rama nama Taraka mantram in the ears of the dead in Kashi.

Infact, it is Lord Shiva who gives out the verse "Sri Rama Ramaethi...".

Lord Shiva has given the humankind the glorious 'Mantraraja Pada Stotram' in praise of Sri Vishnu in his Lakshmi Narasimha Avatara.

It is said, the 'bikshatanar' swaroopa of Lord Shiva manifested after Lord Shiva slayed the 5th head of Brahma. Less known fact is that, Lord Shiva also did tapasya to Sri Vishnu in the 'Tirunangur' divyadesa, which is why Sri Vishnu in his 'Ekadasa' (11) forms gave darshan to Lord Shiva in this sthala to redeem Shiva of the Brahmahathi dosha!

Everyone knows Hanuman ji to be amsha of Lord Shiva!

There maybe more instances. (Also there is a reciprocal list of how Sri Vishnu served Lord Shiva).
 
Sangom ji,

Please find my replies in the following message:

sangom said:
in the case of smaarthas like myself, Vishnu/Krishna and other such Vishnu-linked names are very common. (My younger brother is named Krishnamurthy while my late chithappa was Padmanabhan.) On the contrary, if at all we are unbiased, you will agree that it may not be possible to find anyone with names like Sankara Iyengar, Subramanya Iyengar or even Sankara narayana Iyengar.
Click to expand...

What is in a name, Sir? I am a Vaishnava, but do you know until recently I used to recite Sri Subrahmanya Bhujangam each day?

I will say that projecting Vaishnavism as something far superior to all other schools of philosophy, initiates the friction—at least in this forum.
Click to expand...

I think you did not understand my prior reply, in spite of the fact that you have quoted it. I have chosen to 'reply' to a certain member ridiculing Rama, and Vishnu in her messages recently, which happened prior to me posting this thread. If you want, I can PM you her messages along with timestamp. From that, it should be clear to you, who initiates what.
 
Sangom sirji,

from your post #5:

Though I am not a scholar (in anything!) I feel that no saint or Acharya or great person has praised his/her own brand of God (either Siva or Vishnu) by deriding the other; in the case of smaarthas like myself, Vishnu/Krishna and other such Vishnu-linked names are very common. (My younger brother is named Krishnamurthy while my late chithappa was Padmanabhan.) On the contrary, if at all we are unbiased, you will agree that it may not be possible to find anyone with names like Sankara Iyengar, Subramanya Iyengar or even Sankara narayana Iyengar.
Click to expand...

This is precisely the problem.

Even when you want to stress the importance of avoiding bigotry you are unable to resist the temptation to blame vaishnavites for the frequent fights we witness in this forum.

But if you carefully read all the threads you will find that vaishnavites have only responded to provocations. I give below just two cases and if you can point out just two similar cases where smarthas are targeted I would be offering an apology.

1. Frequent reference to the elephant story and blaming vaishnavites as if all vaishnavites have nothing else to do other than being elephant mahoots applying the y and u mark on the animal and fighting over that. There can not be anything more stupid than this.

2. The frequent reference to the names like Sankaranarayanan, Ramakrishnan etc among smarthas and the absence of a Sankara or a subrahmanya among the vaishnavites. I do not understand why this terrible lack of self esteem among the baiters of vaishnavites. Do we have a Sankara De Cunha or a subrahmanya De silva? or do we have a Mahadeva khan or a Parvati Begum? Vaishnavam is a different faith system. We have only the vedas as common heritage between vaishnavam and smarthism. So vaishnavites have only the names of Vishnu and his avatars. The repeated reference to this and attempts to score a point are childish antics. Even you are unable to get over the temptation to indulge in this kind of cheap one-up-manship. Smarthas keeping the names of vishnu does not mean anything to vaishnavites. They are just happy that they get an opportunity to call them by that name.

I agree with the rest of your post. I reciprocate the sentiments expressed there. Bigotry is bad. But when you indulge in it you have to expect that from the counter party too. It can not be a one way traffic.

Hope you understand. And the others whom I do not want to name.
 
Last edited:
Hinduism only has the uniqueness of 'THARGASHASTRAM' i.e. to debate and come to a conclusion.

After the entry of Mughals and British, Hinduism goes the way of the Abrahamic Religions. Since education level among Christians is very high, debate is freely allowed in western countries, resulting in so many theories emerging from the west. In the case of Islam, it is unthinkable to debate on Islam.

Hinduism would have been cleared of dust, rust, superstitions spread by certain sects, human worship etc. has there been constant debate, and become a religion of universe. Unfortunately, it has not happened.

This is the tragedy of Hinduism.

While, we, Bs may continue with the same traditions, beliefs and indulge in creation of more God men, with buildings and apartments attached, Hinduism's direction will only be decided by NBs, as they form the majority. As the educational level among NBs is on the increase, of late, we come across lot of questioning, especially in Tamil Nadu. This is good for the religion.

Bigotry is in full swing, including reverse, when depicting some Shaivite kings as demons.

Though we don't generally come across names like Sankara Iyengar etc., we come across names with the tail Hassan and a Nachiar with the prefix 'Thulakka'.
 
O' the human mind...today it praises Shiva..tomorrow it praises Vishnu..does God really care who we praise?

Why do we praise God is the question we should ask ourselves...

Its for some gain or the other that we sing praises..

So is that really a praise or a well camouflaged demand?

O' God...I pity you..for the human mind is never ever your true Bhakta.

But You know it too for You said "Among the thousands that strive to know Me..hardly one really knows Me!"

So whether its Om Namah Shivaya..or Om Namo Narayana...God ..You are truly all alone.

Eko'ham..never really became Bahusyam!
 
Last edited:
renuka said:
1)O' the human mind...today it praises Shiva..tomorrow it praises Vishnu..does God really care who we praise?

2)Why do we praise God is the question we should ask ourselves...

3)Its for some gain or the other that we sing praises.So is that really a praise or a well camouflaged demand?

4)O' God...I pity you..for the human mind is never ever your true Bhakta. But You know it too for You said "Among the thousands that strive to know Me..hardly one really knows Me!"

5)So whether its Om Namah Shivaya..or Om Namo Narayana...God ..You are truly all alone.

Eko'ham..never really became Bahusyam!
Click to expand...

I read it loud and it echoed from the distant hills as this:

1)Oh the human mind....the wonderful shilpi who has made a God when you folks were searching for God. Knowing fully well that God cannot be contained, you contained him in the form you made like-who else-yourself. Yes when you can reduce lifeless things and life forms into just representative abstract numbers for adding and subtracting, why not the God. I salute you for your extraordinary resourcefulness. God bless you. And your folks made many such gods and all of them have a space here so you could surrender and be free of burdens.

2)Why do we praise god? we praise because we love Him. We love a child and we call it En Raasaa, en kannamma, and even EEramana rosaavE. As we love God, we apply our familiar method of addressing him which includes a praise. Sometimes we also shout at him, pull him up by asking Him, Unakku kan illiya ennai padaichchu ippadi thavikka vittuttiyeda, avaththamE piravi thanthaai ArangamaanagarulaanE etc.,

3)When I sing God's praise I expect nothing from Him in return just as when I sing to my daughter en kannil paavaiyantrO kannamma. It is my pure love for God that makes me sing His praise and there is no Saudha involved - no not any quid pro quo.

4)O God! There are a million people who do not understand you. So they try to contain you in a known form and then shower their love on you in that form. There are a million others who never understand these bhaktas. But then that is the way you have created them. So it is okay.

5) Aamen.
 
Last edited:
Can there be an Echo in a true Bhaktas hearts?

In the heart of a Bhakta only Narayana is steady.... there is no open space or emptiness to carry the echo.

As long as you still hear an echo...you have not made Narayana your Achala.

Om Namo Narayanaya!
 
renuka said:
Can there be an Echo in a true Bhaktas hearts?

In the heart of a Bhakta only Narayana is steady.... there is no open space or emptiness to carry the echo.

As long as you still hear an echo...you have not made Narayana your Achala.

Om Namo Narayanaya!
Click to expand...

I think there is sufficent space or emptiness in Simhachalam even for Asingams to carry the echo!
 
renuka said:
Can there be an Echo in a true Bhaktas hearts?

In the heart of a Bhakta only Narayana is steady.... there is no open space or emptiness to carry the echo.

As long as you still hear an echo...you have not made Narayana your Achala.

Om Namo Narayanaya!
Click to expand...

Narayana is finite. He coexists with Sri. So echo is possible from Venkatadri.

Problem with UC enthusiasts is that they can never get to know definiteness. They are already lost into the infinite and are poor souls wandering. It is like a butcher trying to sculpt a beautiful statuette. The end product is a miserable looking Jumplingam which is neither here nor there. You can never make out whether it is fully in or out. LOL.
 
Vaagmi said:
The Amen came from Parvati Begum who also lives in the hills along with Jumplingam - sorry Jambulingam..
Click to expand...


Dear Vaagmi ji,


Just say a girl is named Aminah.

Before marriage she is known as Aminah Begum..but after marriage she will be known as Begum Aminah.


So who is this unmarried Parvati Begum living in the hills?
 
Last edited:
Here is the famous Bhajan set to fusion music Composed and Produced by Dr L Subramanian :
Please listen.

Brahmanyan,
Bangalore.


[video]https://youtu.be/fMDgg97nB2A[/video]
 
Tamil poet Namakkal Kavinjar has translated the song in our mother tongue.

Here it is:

வைஷ்ணவ ஜனதோ !

Source: http://emadal.blogspot.in/2008/09/blog-post_12.html

பல்லவி:

வைஷ்ணவன் என்போன் யாரெனக் கேட்பின்

வகுப்பேன் அதனைக் கேட்பீரே! (வைஷ்)

சரணங்கள்

பிறருடைத் துன்பம் தனதென எண்ணும்

பெருங்குணத் தவனே வைஷ்ணவனாம் ;

உறுதுயர் தீர்த்ததில் கர்வங் கொள்ளான்

உண்மை வைஷ்ணவன் அவனாகும் ;

உறவென மனிதர்கள் உலகுள யாரையும்

வணங்குவன் உடல்மனம் சொல்இவற்றால்

அறமெனத் தூய்மை காப்பவன் வைஷ்ணவன்

அவனைப் பெற்றவள் அருந்தவத்தாள். (வைஷ்)


விருப்பும் வெறுப்பும் விலக்கிய நடுநிலை

விளங்கிட ஆசைகள் விட்டவனாய்

ஒருப்புடன் அன்னிய மாதரைத் தாயென

உணர்வோன் வைஷ்ணவன் தன்நாவால்

உரைப்பதிற் பொய்யிலன் ஒருபோதும்அவன்

ஊரார் உடைமையைத் தொடமாட்டான்

வரைப்புள குணமிவை வகிப்பவன் எவனோ

அவனே உண்மை வைஷ்ணவனாம். (வைஷ்)


மாயையும் மோகமும் அணுகா தவனாய்

மனத்தினில் திடமுள வைராக்யன்

நாயக னாகிய சிறீரா மன்திரு

நாமம் கேட்டதும் மெய்ம்மறந்து

போயதில் பரவசம் அடைகிற அவனுடைப்

பொன்னுடல் புண்ணிய தீர்த்தங்கள்

ஆயன யாவையும் அடங்கிய சேத்திரம்

ஆகும்அவனே வைஷ்ணவனாம். (வைஷ்)


கபடமும் லோபமும் இல்லாதவனாய்க்

காம க்ரோதம் களைந்தவனாய்த்

தபசுடை அவனே வைஷ்ணவன் அவனைத்

தரிசிப் பவரின் சந்ததிகள்

சுபமுடை வார்கள் எழுபத் தோராம்

தலைமுறை வரையில் சுகமுறுவர்

அபமறப் புனிதம் அடைகுவர் பிறப்பெனும்

அலைகடல் நீந்திக் கரை சேர்வார். (வைஷ்)


--- நாமக்கல் கவிஞர் வெ.இராமலிங்கம் பிள்ளை
--- இந்தி மூலம்: நரசிம்ம மேத்தா
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

Share this page

Latest posts

Latest ads

Follow us on Social Media

Back
Top