Unless we know the exact meaning of superstition and rituals, it is difficult to answer.
In one of the websites, I read a user's comment that if India could send rocket to Mars, why cannot they manufacture a single indigenous rifle !!!In case that being the truth, How could India became one of the handful of nations that reached Mars that too with a highly economic technology than the so called developed nations use?
How could India became the most sort after destination for satellite launch by most of the developed nations?
How could India stand tall with own missile and other defense development technologies?
How could it be possible for India to have access to nuclear technology?
It is like a pauper saying that "a thousand years ago my family was the royalty in the city of so-and-so, and hence I am rich now".The following were Indian contributions to the world of Science at such a time when most of the present developed could even start thinking
In one of the websites, I read a user's comment that if India could send rocket to Mars, why cannot they manufacture a single indigenous rifle !!!
It is like a pauper saying that "a thousand years ago my family was the royalty in the city of so-and-so, and hence I am rich now".
Cannot agree with the premise of the opening post.
Each country is unique with its own contributions to the world and its own set of issues.
There are obvious superstitions and there are more sophisticated superstitions. But they are all one and the same.
It is possible to make a detailed list of western superstitions which have had enormous negative effect on the whole world. What is the point in doing it. There is no need to do any comparisons.
Human beings have the capacity to imagine and superstitions reflect that capacity.
India's contributions to the world in the art of thinking objectively is tremendous. For many historical reasons there is poverty and the powerful are exploiting the poor like everywhere else except they use feudal means. All this will change in the next 50 years or so propelling India into a world power.
You are missing the elephant for the stars.The user's silly comment has an answer if he had cared to find out. India is not making a new rifle right from nut, bolt, but and rifled bore and patent it because it is far more easier to move ahead with a wheel rather than inventing it all the way again. Stupid, it is economics simple and straight. LOL.
Again, that is not the point is it. You are just rephrasing my sentence with a different example while conveniently missing the intent.If you search for the members of the Mughal dynasty alive today, you may find just a butcher slaughtering goats and bulls in the bylanes of Old Delhi. That does not take away the fact that his forefathers built the Taj Mahal. He has every right to claim that he comes in the family of such a dynasty.
You are missing the elephant for the stars.
Make in India is an enormous project. If economics were all that matters, we have competitive countries who could floor India for cost. The intent in the user's statement was that India is relying on borrowed technology rather than indigenous know-how.
Again, that is not the point is it. You are just rephrasing my sentence with a different example while conveniently missing the intent. Speaking about lost glory does not place one on a pedestal.
In any case, foreign travel was impossible. Kumbakonam was a place where culture and religion were completely intertwined. Ramanujan was a Brahmin, the caste of priests and intellectuals; a Vaishnavite, who regarded Vishnu as god over all and who worshiped his local avatar, Narasimha; and an Iyengar who kept to a complex diet that prohibited all meat, but also cheese, onions, salt, rice on some days, food of any kind on others, and governed who was allowed to prepare his food, and in what state of ceremonial purity, and with whom he was allowed to eat. To live abroad would be to abandon this web of identity. It would be an act of self-destruction, a form of suicide, really.