Sow.Happy Hindu said, that, part of your message were "perfect sentences from a right wing extremist". Technically she did not call you a 'right wing extremist'. Anyway, you got offended by Sow.Happy Hindu's comments. Fair enough. Honestly I don't see anything wrong with your getting offended. But 'right wing extremist' is not a personal comment. In return, you could have chosen some choicy phrases to address Sow.HH like 'brahmin basher'; Periarist; DK minion etc. But instead you chose to address Sow.Happy Hindu's caste of birth (what ever it may be) and her personal life. Sorry Sir, you did not maintain the decorum in that conversation. In my sincere opinion, you owe an apology to Sow.Happy Hindu. (You may wish to address her with some of the choicy general phrases as I mentioned before when you address her to apologise! I don't know about others, but that would seem perfectly alright in my opinion). Thanks.
Cheers!
First, am not sure why everyone is interested in asking someone like sbala to apologise to me (did i ask for it?).
Considering the violence endorsement, i pointed out the sentences with question marks to leave the possibility open abt whether or not it belongs to a right wing extremist.
Perfect sentence(s) from a right wing extremist (??)
Secondly, thanks Raghy for showing up what you really think or what you really are. So if someone mentions things abt
(a) inclusion of dalits to vedic schools, and
(b) doubts on the origin of the kanchi mutt and its endorsements for dharmashastras,
which ppl like you do not want to hear, they immediately get tagged with epithets like brahmin basher; Periarist; DK minion.
And yes, am grateful for the conversations on this forum so far - its been a good learning experience abt the Vox Pouli of the so-called brahmindom of Tamilnadu. So, the public sentiment of the masses in past was not misplaced afterall.
If there were cranks like EVR in the past, looks like such ppl got popular, not for what they themselves were, but for what they represented - something that was lapped up by the masses in the poverty rung. A point that is taken advantage of by politicians to this day.
Sow.Sri.Happy Hindu said:-
"Some town folk in kanchi talk abt how some certain particular relatives of a junior pontiff became rich suddenly. They can go to quite some length reg monetary issues. You might find their talk 'provocative' but you cannot stop them from saying what they observe.
Wrt the relatives of one junior pontiff, no matter how 'cultured' one is, perhaps some ppl cannot help converting that into capitalism as well (leading to the question - 'what really is culture then')."
Sow.Happy Hindu, I have a huge respect for your write ups mainly due to the research you carry out and the references you could provide to back up your claims. Sow.HH, are you planning to provide references for this? If you do not have references, I am sorry, I have to request you to consider kindly editing that part of the message, please. I am suggesting this to avoid upsetting many members who have a huge respect for the Kanchi mutt. I sincerely hope you would appreciate my concerns.Thank you.
Cheers!
Its not possible to record conversations and attach audio files as reference to the above. And sorry Raghy, am not editing the part out (as yet). But yes, you can find links on google abt the involvement of brothers in managing a rich institution..
Regards.
Last edited: