hi,
I think we Brahmins are divided by only one factor called "Poonool".
There are Brahmins with Poonool and there are those who shunned it along with the established norms [i know some of the eat any thing except human whilst it is strictly unthinkable to a battacharya).
There are Brahmins with Poonool who are poor and zamindars.
There are Brahmins without Poonool who are poor with rich.
When they say they are brahmins, it is highly confusing to NBs.
Why Poonool becomes a matter here, because no other castes uses poonool to differentiate their castes from others (practically).
So the public don't understand if somebody sport poonool and practice a very simple way of life and a brahmin without a poonool and all the extravagant life style. They just understand what is best suites to them.
I know there are brahmins with and without a poonool living in a very pathetic condition, they can not get support from a rich and affluent Brahmin with a poonool and without a poonool. There won't be unity unless the norms are clearly established like with the other castes.
Yes, brahmins can unite and fight for our RIGHTFUL share of the resources and wealth leaving all the benchmarks which made brahminism, a very difficult path to live,,,,, is to shed poonool and declare as a CASTE,unite and fight OR stop identifying as brahmins once we leave the established norms and poonool leaving all the brickbats to the rightful target. At-least they would get a chance to defend themselves from this ambiguous situation.