• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Algorithm that can tell couples - should they break up or stay together

Status
Not open for further replies.

tks

0
Source: http://www.mlive.com/news/us-world/index.ssf/2016/02/algorithm_tries_to_determine_w.html

===================================================ST. LOUIS — When Rashied Amini's girlfriend wanted to break up two years ago, he wondered if he could mathematically prove that they should stay together.

Amini was working as a systems engineer at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory at the time. He knew how to build predictive models about space missions using algorithms.

Maybe he could apply the same approach to matters of the heart.

He returned to his alma mater to pursue a doctorate in astrophysics at Washington University, while also developing a romance predictor.

On Friday, he launched Nanaya.co, an online site that can predict the user's chances of finding an ideal match, where it's most likely to happen, when you should settle down and how happy you're likely to be in the relationship. There's also a section on how to change your current behavior, such as where and with whom you socialize, to increase your odds of meeting your ideal match. The site is currently free.

"As a theorist whose job it is to come up with models that represent reality that you can make decisions from, I thought I could do this," he said. The idea of making personal decisions based on information and science has been around for a while. But because romance is so subjective it can be the hardest problem to solve simply based on data.

On the site, users begin by taking a romantic personality test. Then, there are questions about lifestyle preferences, values, future goals and one's experiences being single. It also takes into account your deal-breakers in a future partner.

It's different from the plethora of dating or matchmaking websites; some of which also use algorithms to match users with likely partners. Nanaya's predictions are based on the user's responses in relation to all the other data collected from the rest of the users in its database. Currently, about 22,000 people have taken the personality test, which enabled him to design the beta.

Before Amini adds the "stay together or break up" feature in the reports, he wants to reach at least 100,000 users to make the results more reliable. The site is aimed at people in their 20s and 30s who are wondering whether to stay in a relationship or continue to play the field.

Roman Solowski, 33, filled out an early version of Amini's questionnaire to help out his buddy from college. At the time, Solowski had been dating his girlfriend for nearly a year and a half. His results indicated that until age 35 he would be happiest in a relationship with her, but after that age he would be happier single.

"How are you supposed to interpret that?" he said.

Solowski proposed anyway. So far, he says things are going well.

"Maybe you should ask me two years from now," he said. Solowski, an attorney in Chicago, never shared the results with his wife.

"I don't want to cause any trouble," he said. "I don't think anyone is going to take it very well."

Amini said Solowski's results do not predict that he and his wife will break up eventually. The analysis suggests that there were favorable odds that Solowski could have met a better match years down the line.

"The main feedback is merely to consider it. Not because it's the truth, but just food for thought," Amini said. "I like to think this a vehicle for self-awareness more than anything else."

Bill Wing, co-founder of the Relationship Center of St. Louis, says most people get "a little itchy" around age 35. It may be a good time for anyone to work on their relationships, he said. Wing sees value in using Amini's tool as one part of a decision-making process.

"I think it's an excellent idea" when considering a potential life partner, Wing said. "So many times we stay with people because they are familiar."

"You don't want to settle because you are fearful or worried about whether there is anyone else out there," he added. Wing, who has counseled hundreds of couples over a career spanning more than 35 years, cautioned that regardless of whom a person marries, two-thirds of differences that arise will be perpetual and unresolvable. The couple's long-term success lies in how they deal with those differences.

"I'm not sure if there's an algorithm for that," he said.

As far as Amini's relationship that inspired the site, it ended regardless of what the math advised.

Amini, 30, plans to defend his dissertation this summer and rejoin the engineers at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. While working more than 100 hours a week on this site and his doctorate, he didn't have time for dating. But his own Nanaya analysis says he should settle down between 31 to 32 years old.

So, he will be back on market soon enough looking for the stars to align.



=====================================

Question to our members: Does our horoscope predict if a wedding will end up in divorce?
 
Dear Shri TKS,

I think it would based on my understanding of astrology. I have just a cursory understanding of it but the concepts seem to be consistent and valid. My positive experiences of vedic knowledge add to my belief in astrology. Experts would be able to throw more light on this.
 
Last edited:
Astrology the way it is defined and practiced is based purely on beliefs and hence cannot be used for reason & understanding based discussions.

Even if Vedic Astrology is sanctified by the adjective "vedic' , the astrologers are limited human beings. Often two astrologers rarely agree in their interpretations.

Given too many factors to isolate, a proper statistical study is almost impossible.

Therefore like any other beliefs this is another expression of human imagination.

The one who believes in Astrology may think it is all logical and will be unable to see that this entire field is based on human capacity to believe.
 
Astrology the way it is defined and practiced is based purely on beliefs and hence cannot be used for reason & understanding based discussions.

Even if Vedic Astrology is sanctified by the adjective "vedic' , the astrologers are limited human beings. Often two astrologers rarely agree in their interpretations.

Given too many factors to isolate, a proper statistical study is almost impossible.

Therefore like any other beliefs this is another expression of human imagination.

The one who believes in Astrology may think it is all logical and will be unable to see that this entire field is based on human capacity to believe.

Two astrologers need not agree. Even if one is able to consistently give predictions that is mostly right it is enough proof. When something works there has to be logic and so it is not right to dismiss something as illogical just because we are not able to see the logic.
 
Two astrologers need not agree. Even if one is able to consistently give predictions that is mostly right it is enough proof. When something works there has to be logic and so it is not right to dismiss something as illogical just because we are not able to see the logic.

For the highlighted part there are precise statistical methods to establish correlation. But to do such a correlation the set up has to be controlled which is not possible due to too many uncontrolled variables. Therefore such areas can only be thought of in a belief system.

"When something works" is not yet proven therefore. A believer can believe anything and it is not in the realm of thinking and logic.

Thinking includes both step by step logic and intuitive deductions. For example Mathematics genius Ramanujan came up with theorems without proof (by intuition) but it is taken seriously only because formal proofs could be made. In some instances it comprised an entire thesis.

The rigor of understanding is found only in mathematics, Physics and in Vedanta (not in most schools of thought).

Astrology does not feature in any of such areas.

Having said this, human being endowed with power of imagination will continue to believe in Astrology and other such things and my statements are not a value statement about them.
 
Last edited:
If you believe in the rigor of vedanta, more specifically in advaita , you should believe that the physical world is an illusion. Then what value do the truths of science have, when what you see and measure is true only in a relative way. You are bound to be proven wrong eventually. But the mind which has imagination can also help us see the absolute truth. So I would prefer to use my mind to find the truth and not rely on my senses or any physical instrument.

Anyway, how would the proof be for something spiritual? We have just started seeing people trying to relate spiritual knowledge to science. I think people would succeed and then we can see the proof. Till then the worst you can say about spiritual knowledge is , it is unknown whether it is true or not.
 
If you believe in the rigor of vedanta, more specifically in advaita , you should believe that the physical world is an illusion. Then what value do the truths of science have, when what you see and measure is true only in a relative way. You are bound to be proven wrong eventually. But the mind which has imagination can also help us see the absolute truth. So I would prefer to use my mind to find the truth and not rely on my senses or any physical instrument.

Anyway, how would the proof be for something spiritual? We have just started seeing people trying to relate spiritual knowledge to science. I think people would succeed and then we can see the proof. Till then the worst you can say about spiritual knowledge is , it is unknown whether it is true or not.

Sri Sravana,

I do not believe in the teachings of Vedanta. I highlighted the word belief in your statement just to tell you that this topic area has nothing to do with belief.

Also mind cannot help see any "absolute truth".

Given your beliefs, I am unable to proceed with further engagement though I do appreciate your engagement thus far

best regards
 
Sri Sravana,

I do not believe in the teachings of Vedanta. I highlighted the word belief in your statement just to tell you that this topic area has nothing to do with belief.

Also mind cannot help see any "absolute truth".

Given your beliefs, I am unable to proceed with further engagement though I do appreciate your engagement thus far

best regards

OK, No problem
 
Recently they invented a software that can analyse human thoughts. Maybe this algorithm has gone into making that software?!!
I predict all matrimonial profiles in the future would require this compatibility analysis report to be uploaded along with the photo and biodata :)
 
Recently they invented a software that can analyse human thoughts. Maybe this algorithm has gone into making that software?!!
I predict all matrimonial profiles in the future would require this compatibility analysis report to be uploaded along with the photo and biodata :)

That is funny! Well no one will get married then.

Thoughts can include acts committed as well as coveted :-)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top