Prof. R Vaidyanathan's essay is another attempt to look for holes, but missing the greens. He wants anna to do what he wants and expects that his suggestions will be more successful.
1. Anna was terribly focussed on the janlokpal bill and its minimul essential contents. He did not - did not- include all issues under the sun. Ramdev mixed so many issues in his demands - hang the corrupt, bring foreign held money, seize all assets etc. Obviously for every 100 people who accept all his demands, there will be 100 each who will oppose at leat one of his demands. In case of anna, for every 100 who agree there may be 20 detractors.
2. Subramanyam swamy has been shouting all over the world that sonia, chidambaram, karunanidhi, raja, kanomozhi and a many more have benefitted finacially and have received corrupt proceeds. Neither he is sued for defamation nor the media doimng investgative journalism.
Anna has stirred a large section of the public and has exposed how slippery the corrupt government is.
Shri Sarang,
I understand that we are on opposite sides on the current topic. Still, I thought it proper and necessary to clarify why Subramaniam Swamy is not sued for defamation nor the investigative journalists are able to throw mud on him.
It is because, as Shri Swamy himself told in public address that if any one including Sonia, sues for defamation, she will have to answer such extremely inconvenient questions from him and/or his lawyer, that no one dares to spoil the fragile reputation on which they currently sail.
Swamy has also said in a talk in Bengaluru that when NDA was in power, he suggested that the GOI ask the college in which Rahul supposedly studies (I forget its name now) to furnish the particulars of the bank account from which payments to that college were being made. But the NDA govt. itself was not honest enough to do that; you can imagine the reasons. (பாம்பின் கால் பாம்புக்குத் தெரியும்!). He said also that his contacts in US have given him to understand that the moneys came from an account in Cayman Islands, a tax haven. Perhaps Swamy has much more info but can bring it out only at the appropriate time through the Supreme Court proceedings, if such a chance presents itself.
Regarding Sonia Gandhi, I have heard from my superior officer and close friend, that when he went on official work to Italy, his host (bank) took him to Sonia's native place and the person explained to him how, from a very, very modest lower middle class household, the Mainos have now become aristocracy, owning posh villas and other paraphernalia. I have written about this in detail in this forum itself once or twice in the past. So, you may try to search and locate.
Chidu's son being paid a very huge sum for just changing the logo of one (nationalized bank) was circulated by the bank's employees' union's newsletter. His wife appearing in income-tax department cases and earning crores per year, are also widely known.
Anna and his coterie who have projected him as Gandhi II on the national and international scene may think that Anna is really the rebirth of the original Gandhi but the difference in style and personality are too glaring for many people to believe all that the media tries to make-believe. Anyway, in the coming months we will come to know more.