sangom
0
Dear Sravna,Dear Shri Nara and Shri Sangom,
To me Advaita philosophy appears totally coherent and flawless. Intuitively it seems to me that the truths of atman being brahman and that of maya are the most profound insights one could have and requires sheer super genius to grasp.
I admit I am not a super genius, but only a very mediocre person with below average intelligence. May be that is why the deficiencies of advaita (as well as visishtadvaita) appear to me as obstructions in completely accepting them as fault-free. (I don't have much knowledge of dvaitham and hence I cannot comment on it.)
To a person with only bookish knowledge, lke me, you seem to have modified even Sankara's advaita! Whereas Sankara and his followers say that adhyaaropa, avidyaa, maayaa, whatever, has an end (though it is anaadi) at which point the jeeva gains liberation, you now state that maayaa has no end either. Wonderful!!To my understanding, maya does not have a beginning or an end. It co-exists with Brahman and is neither created nor has an end and one can say the physical worlds co-exist with the spiritual world each physical world being transient.
"protect yourself": what is 'yourself'? Is the self real? protect from what change?A defining aspect of the physical realm is change. Everything undergoes change constantly and perishes eventually. To protect yourself against change or the ability to be totally unaffected by anything is a necessity for a timeless existence. Even the universe is not immune against an end and according to Hindu philosophy it does come to an end.
Mind is only one of the accessories of the jeeva or soul; if mind alone can attain timeless nature, what will it be in that stage? Will it be independent of jiva?A mind that is totally evolved attains timeless nature and hence becomes purely spiritual and merges with brahman.
Frankly this is beyond my comprehension. I now have to admit that I do not know anything about advaitam. But just for clarifying doubts:We can view maya and therefore physical reality as the operative aspects of brahman, whose function is to produce brahman's timeless nature or we can say that brahman is timeless because maya operates and produces that effect. More accurately while talking of timeless nature we ahould say that the effects are engrained within brahman and because of the nature of the physical reality it has to be acted out in space-time, brahman or the souls seem to experience the space-time effects.
1. How can brahman, nirguna, have an operating aspect? It will then become a saguna with operational ability.
2. Maya operates to produce Brahman's timelessness?! Sankara said Maya created illusory world which is bound by time, form etc. Now whom to believe and follow, Sankara or yourself?
3. Timeless nature ingrained in brahman which by sankara's definition cannot have any nature, or characteristic?
Dear Sravna, I would, as Mr. Nara did, request you to study advaita and then discuss. but if you feel you have the necessary knowledge of advaita, you may kindly post a primer of advaita according to your belief, so that I can study and then get my doubts, if any, clarified from you.
Thanks in advance,