Now that I have been dragged in, I want to clarify certain things and will stay put.
I really did not want to do it, but I am being forced to respond.
Whether they make sense to people concerned or they feel otherwise is not by concern at the moment.
Of course, just like the majority, my first reaction to the episode was a shock, sympathy and some anger that caused disruption and
trauma to an individual and a genuine feel of concern and worry was there.
But I did not expect that this episode would continue like a mega serial with no additional inputs or insights but only a replay.
There was nothing sought from the public here,except trying be stay in the limelight. I know I am alone her and all these will
be discounted, but I still express what I see.
There was absolutely no trauma on the 3rd day, as the post events just prove. Some one watching the clock and the minutes after a
trauma and making it appear a great feat to be reported and discussed and one who claims to be very practical and daring in life,
should be open to some taunts and feedback about things after they have subsided. If this wasnt the case, the individual should have just closed it amicably and have had private exchanges with those whose opinions matter.
It is the first time that I have come to hear that talk of pottu and gold are considered insenstive. Offering these to qualified
women are considered saubhagyam and in current world, not offering it to unqualified people is considered insenstive, so I
completely fail to understand the purport of the message.
Further if this type of message is considered insenstive, I wonder what level of insenstivity the individual had, when repeatedly
some context was brought here perhaps with a view to taunt some discussion on it.
Of course the majority here except another mature member would disagree.
As far as your comments on Limits are concerned, as mentioned I used it with a conscious and ofcourse some amount of anger.
I used the same or similar message I saw one of your fan/friend use it to a more conservative and orthodox woman in this forum.
I did not see either you or anyone else raising any objections. When viewed against the above drop I see no harm in its usage.
When you say something, it is with an open and liberal mind, and when same thing is given back - it is stretching limits? So be it.
I feel I have explained and rest myself clear and clean in my intent.
I have no interest in discussing this further and will provide no further justifications
or clarification nor respond to any comments.
I really did not want to do it, but I am being forced to respond.
Whether they make sense to people concerned or they feel otherwise is not by concern at the moment.
Of course, just like the majority, my first reaction to the episode was a shock, sympathy and some anger that caused disruption and
trauma to an individual and a genuine feel of concern and worry was there.
But I did not expect that this episode would continue like a mega serial with no additional inputs or insights but only a replay.
There was nothing sought from the public here,except trying be stay in the limelight. I know I am alone her and all these will
be discounted, but I still express what I see.
There was absolutely no trauma on the 3rd day, as the post events just prove. Some one watching the clock and the minutes after a
trauma and making it appear a great feat to be reported and discussed and one who claims to be very practical and daring in life,
should be open to some taunts and feedback about things after they have subsided. If this wasnt the case, the individual should have just closed it amicably and have had private exchanges with those whose opinions matter.
It is the first time that I have come to hear that talk of pottu and gold are considered insenstive. Offering these to qualified
women are considered saubhagyam and in current world, not offering it to unqualified people is considered insenstive, so I
completely fail to understand the purport of the message.
Further if this type of message is considered insenstive, I wonder what level of insenstivity the individual had, when repeatedly
some context was brought here perhaps with a view to taunt some discussion on it.
Surely, my insensitivity if any isnt much worse than what the individual has been trying to describe.
Of course the majority here except another mature member would disagree.
As far as your comments on Limits are concerned, as mentioned I used it with a conscious and ofcourse some amount of anger.
I used the same or similar message I saw one of your fan/friend use it to a more conservative and orthodox woman in this forum.
I did not see either you or anyone else raising any objections. When viewed against the above drop I see no harm in its usage.
When you say something, it is with an open and liberal mind, and when same thing is given back - it is stretching limits? So be it.
I feel I have explained and rest myself clear and clean in my intent.
I have no interest in discussing this further and will provide no further justifications
or clarification nor respond to any comments.
