renuka
Well-known member
IMO. if gothra is changed to that of the new father, the sense of bondage, affection and emotional security would be strengthened between the children and children's new father.
Human's sense of family relationship and values makes true sense only if there exists the sense of "We all are same as a family, linked/bonded to each other, till death keeps us apart".
If such a family decides to not to utter gothra during any prayers, traditional ceremonies, rites etc, than there is no need to think and conclude as what Gothra should they belong to?
Ex Husband off course will always have visiting rights for his children even though the ex wife has remarried. But, IMO, the ex husband should help his children build strong emotional bondage with their new father rather just giving the sense of costodian status of the new father. This sense of custodian status of the new father would by default instill children with the idea of - "The new man of our mother is her's, not ours" / "A father is a father and a custodian is a custodian".
If children are too young, the above would be the right move. If children are grown up adults, than they "know" as what to consider and how to behave.
The above opinions of mine are considering Indian-Hindu family system/values alone, who all wants some tradition to fallow and the Gothra to be associated with.
Dear Ravi,
Do we really need to apply all rules of Gothra change when first and foremost Divorce is not in Sanathana Dharma.
So when people these days have chosen the Civil Law over Sanathana Dharma why do we need to fit in gothra change.
We should either stick to Sanathana Dharma or Civil Law and not amalgamate it cos the DNA of the children dont change with remarriage of a divorced mum.