Dear Kunjuppu, your post #49:
If Ashvin's was wringing of hands, your post #49 is recommendation for harakiri. Now to the specifics:
Your understanding is highly skewed. Please come back to firm ground.
And finally I have to say this. If you have settled down in Canada, please choose a girl or boy for your children from the available local population and celebrate the marriage because your options are not many. But for us here in bharathvarsh we still have our options. So what is applicable to you may not be applicable to us here. So please keep whatever you have with you and be happy. Your attempt to sell your formula to us here is clumsy.
Cheers.
If Ashvin's was wringing of hands, your post #49 is recommendation for harakiri. Now to the specifics:
When was it different? Always these are the driving forces for any culture. If some one says it is not so he is not honest. This applies particularly to minorities and weaklings which brahmins are.since the dawn of the 20th century, the community has gone by the rule of the 3cs - Convenience, Collaboration and Cash.
Not every one of us. Every community has such blacksheeps. Even Jesus Christ had one amongst his close followers. It was the powerful forces of a monetised economy which drove us away from Sanskrit and out rituals became just meaningless rituals to most of us. It was not as if we deliberately chose to turn every ritual into a meaningless process. We were helpless. Yet those who wanted, learnt the meaning and had the satisfaction of doing a perfect karma. Do we do a ritual to satisfy the society? When do we do that? There you are underestimating the society.we twisted the rituals to suit our convenience, the vathiars collaborated with us for doing this, and in return we provided them cash in lieu of values. our conscience was cleared, as per 'namesake' we did the 'rituals' and supposedly satisified the pithrus and the rest of the society (so we thought).
We have had enough of thought and hair splitting interpretion of those thoughts. What we need is a simple understanding of the greatness of our community and genuine pride in having saved it from extinction this far. There is nothing great in other communities which is adequate reward for merger. If you know just one, please let me know. I have very close and intimate understanding of all those communities as I have lived for long in their midst.personally, i think, this is the ripe time for reformation of our creed. move away from rituals and into the world of thought. that too simplified thought so that the least common denominator can understand, support, propagate and live by those thoughts. if that is not possible, then i think, we are in for further watering down to eventual merger with our host communities whether it be marathis, punjabis or canadians.
Purity of blood and lineage are not things to be dismissed so lightly without even trying to understand them. I have said this already and am saying it again. 1)Culture has an impact at the gene level 2)Cultural practices modify the genes in a fundamental way over thousands of years of adherence to such practices. This is not empty rhetoric. This has been proved scientifically by anthropologists. Please refer to the work of anthropologist Robert Boyd and his colleague from the UCLA.(University of California Los angeles) and at least two other teams of researchers who are working in this area. It is neither a figment of imagination nor an aberration as you are trying to make out. If any thing, your understanding of the subject is completely flawed. You are prejudiced and it would be better if you approach the subject with an open mind forgetting for a moment all the rhetoric and catchy phrases about equality, fraternity etc.that may not be a bad thing, if one feels that this the normal flow of history. and that the past milleniums, with its adherence to the concept of purity of blood and lineage, through arranged marriage, is but a figment of imagination or aberration of norms. i dont know.
If I studied in IIT and am in a position to decide the selection of a vendor for my company and if I come across two competitors and one of them is an IITian, my natural preference will be for him if other things are all equal. That is the way the society functions. We are all comfortable with a known quantity (Ask Praveen’s computer. It knows a lot about this. If you have doubt move your cursor over the small rectangle you see below my name/avatar here). I said about taking pledges (Pledge #1?) in this context. There is no need to declare and make position statements before deciding on a brahmin in preference to others. Of course it is your right to twist things out of shape and then score a point.to talk of taking pledges and also getting powerfully positioned tambrams to identify their caste publicly and do religious identity type of things, will eventually smack of hindutva politics, as it invariably becomes a bastion of bashing everyone other than tambrams. that has been the results before, because we have tried. the tambram association is supposed to 'safeguard' our interests, but i think, we will have a big problems identifying what our 'interest' is.
This is the outcome of binary thinking. By being aware of your roots as a Brahmin how does it make you non-hindu? Why should separation from others come in? Please understand clearly that being aware of your heritage and cultural roots as a Brahmin is not to automatically bestow any superiority to you. Why do you translate the Brahmin and others equation into a superior and inferior equation. They are not the same. Being a Brahmin I do not claim any inherent superiority nor do I accept any inherent inferiority. I am just saying I am a Brahmin. The rest is all politics.many of us, abhor the concept of separation from our hindu brethren. that type of distinctivity as practised 100 years ago, including agraharam living, does not hold water anymore. it is perhaps that isolation, more than anything else, prevented us from understanding the deep differences between the various tamil hindu groups. to us these were one homogeneous NB, and we can see from another thread by ashwin, who continues to carry that idea. must have been drummed pretty hard and good into his head.
I do not know as to what was the reasons for the stand taken by Kanchi Acharya if at all he had taken such a stand. I will do some research and come back. Till then I have nothing to say about this.many adhere themselves to mutts like kanchi or sringeri. but these are rock hard residences of status quo. the previous kanchi mutt head is supposed to have begged gandhi to call of vaikom struggle, as entry of dalits would eventually result in the destruction of sanatana dharma. everyone of us can wonder, on this action from a supposed learned pontiff, the fairness and empathyness of this attitude, as viewed by a God common to us all. in a world of equals, there should be no nandanars, and no need to deify him. for all of us are either nandanars or achaarayars.
I do not agree with handwringing when there is a problem. Nor do I applaud doomsday soothsayers with their easy solutions to give up every thing that is dear and merge and float in the stream listlessly and aimlessly. Brahmin girls and boys married other caste men and women in earlier times too. It is not something which bothers me too much. It all depends on the upbringing and circumstances. Parents are the culprits. In all such cases the parents have failed miserably in their duties to the children. May be in order to silence the conscience which is pricking, they pat themselves on their back saying they are cosmopolitan in outlook and are modern. Pathetic creatures, they can not live peacefully otherwise. Agraharams are deserted because the economy is changing its shape. From being an agrarian economy it is becoming a manufacturing economy. What is applicable to Brahmins is equally applicable to other communities too. There are thevar and chettiyar girls marrying Brahmin or nadar boys because of opportunities which are many these days as compared to earlier times. But that does not make intercaste or interreligious marriages desirable or preferred unions. It is not as if every Brahmin girl is standing in a queue to marry boy from a different community.i think no amount of hand wringing or breast beating is going to change the way the community is going. we can speculate on the results. but the facts are that agraharams are deserted. our girls are doing better and earning more than the boys. they are more open to marriages outside of our caste. and a significant portion of our community is outside of india. i may even venture to say, with a certain amount of confidence, that the majority of tambrams live outside of tamilnadu - just a gut feeling there.
Our past was not a flawed one. It was a glorious one. It remains a glorious one even today as many of my friends from other communities say. They all prefer to buy their houses in Brahmin localities in cities. They want their children to pick up friends from Brahmins in preference to others. It was flawed only in the eyes of a few casteist politicians and it will remain that way. We do not want to change them.with all this in the momentum, with an absolute zero in terms of leadership of any kind, and absolutely no vision of what we should be in the future, and having pangs over an imagined but what i think is a highly flawed past, i think, all we can do, to instant outbursts of folks like ashwin (he is gone now i think never to appear again), is to mope and mumble, pat some consolation, and keep on moving, doing the very same things, that some feel are inimical to our existence, and yet practise it.jai tambram!
Your understanding is highly skewed. Please come back to firm ground.
And finally I have to say this. If you have settled down in Canada, please choose a girl or boy for your children from the available local population and celebrate the marriage because your options are not many. But for us here in bharathvarsh we still have our options. So what is applicable to you may not be applicable to us here. So please keep whatever you have with you and be happy. Your attempt to sell your formula to us here is clumsy.
Cheers.