• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Fun is no sin

Status
Not open for further replies.
The free speech debate may have achieved a small victory this week. After being almost-published four times, author Kiran Nagarkar's 1977 play 'Bedtime Story' is finally coming out in print. It is being published by HarperCollins India, alongside a screenplay, 'Black Tulip' — both boiling over with Nagarkar's dark, searing humour. The full article in the link

Fun Is No Sin - - Why should ancient faiths feel thredened?

?Why should ancient faiths feel threatened?? - The Times of India




Thanks for that post.


I liked these quotes:
"Why does Hinduism — this cluster of all kinds of beliefs — which has been around so many years, still feel threatened? The same with Islam. To feel insecure is to be unsure about oneself, and hence, to undermine the very values one stands for," says Nagarkar.




His favourite example is the myth surrounding the story of Ekalavya. He says he is astounded by the quality of observation that goes into the story — the distinctions created between the upper and lower caste. When he recently asked a class of students their take on the significance of the Ekalavya story, based on what their families have told them, they all extolled the virtues of the guru-shishya tradition.

In Nagarkar's version, he says he focussed on the whole Dalit condition, and caste, "and how we have found such superb ways of putting them down." He reworks the story so that when the guru asks the student for his thumb as dakshina, Ekalayva fashions it from a piece of earth and hands it over to Drona. "He never, never forgets for a minute that Dronacharya is the guru, and yet at no point in time is he any less of a prince in his statement and action," says Nagarkar. "It doesn't belittle anybody if one falls in love with these stories and changes them. Have we lost our sense of balance?"





 
prasadji,


"Why does Hinduism — this cluster of all kinds of beliefs — which has been around so many years, still feel threatened? The same with Islam. To feel insecure is to be unsure about oneself, and hence, to undermine the very values one stands for," says Nagarkar.


The salient point missed is that it is not the faith that is feeling insecure. It is the individuals that follow that faith and incidentally happen to live as a community on this earth who feel insecure. They feel insecure because every other faith uses faith as a political instrument to organize, spread their particular brand, control and destroy large masses of people. The faith by itself will stand any test of reasonableness at an intellectual level. Earlier it was the sword that was used to enslave people of other faiths and today it is the gun and the slitting of throat in public view and before cameras that is used to enslave.

His favourite example is the myth surrounding the story of Ekalavya. He says he is astounded by the quality of observation that goes into the story — the distinctions created between the upper and lower caste. When he recently asked a class of students their take on the significance of the Ekalavya story, based on what their families have told them, they all extolled the virtues of the guru-shishya tradition.
In Nagarkar's version, he says he focussed on the whole Dalit condition, and caste, "and how we have found such superb ways of putting them down." He reworks the story so that when the guru asks the student for his thumb as dakshina, Ekalayva fashions it from a piece of earth and hands it over to Drona. "He never, never forgets for a minute that Dronacharya is the guru, and yet at no point in time is he any less of a prince in his statement and action," says Nagarkar. "It doesn't belittle anybody if one falls in love with these stories and changes them. Have we lost our sense of balance?"

Wasted time.
 
"It doesn't belittle anybody if one falls in love with these stories and changes them. Have we lost our sense of balance?"
\

Fine as long as the narrator says this is my version and differs from the original time honoured version. Of course this accommodation will not apply to ROP and ROC. All hell will break loose.

Goes without saying that our budhdhis will grasp what we think is rational based on our religious and spiritual development.
 
prasadji,



It is the individuals that follow that faith and incidentally happen to live as a community on this earth who feel insecure.

[/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/COLOR]
I can buy that logic. So an individual cab feel threatened and so stop reading such writing instead of getting it censored by government etc. Just because one religion was able to get some other piece censored, we need not follow it.

Wasted time.

May be from an upper caste person (nothing personal).
From Dalit's point of view it is not.

In Nagarkar's version, he says he focussed on the whole Dalit condition, and caste, "and how we have found such superb ways of putting them down."
 
May be from an upper caste person (nothing personal).
From Dalit's point of view it is not.

Oh yeah. Very true indeed. Nagarkar has thrown light for the first time on a so far unknown truth. It is a great invention/discovery after the discovery /invention of wheel/theory of relativity by the human civilization. He deserves a Nobel Prize for his this great discovery. He has only spent his time well in doing a lot of research into the subject. Nagarkar jay ho. And Arm-chair revolutionary caste eradication soldiers jay ho. LOL.
 
Dear Janaki Ji,

You say Fun is No Sin...but is Sin Fun?LOL[/QUOTE

Yes It is in Kashi on Holi!!

The bohemian nature of Shaivism is also said to culminate in a linguistic transference of sorts. Expletives of a phallic nature are all considered derivatives of Shiva’s divine linga (phallus). Besides, the god of destruction is thought to be a receptacle of all things abject — the snake around his neck, the poison in his throat, the ash smeared on his body. It is assumed that crummy language is something such a deity would heartily celebrate. Holi then becomes a tailor-made carnival for revelries in a starkly Dionysian city. As Bhattacharya explains, “The extra-constitutional liberty which Holi provides allows us to accept anything that gets uttered.”
.

Roasted in Kashi | Business Line
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top