RVR
0
Shri RVR,So, now you are trying to brainwash him back...? Can it not be seen that way? You have used the word 'trap'; did Nithyananda wilfully cause the boy to fail in his love? Or perhaps, do all the devotees/disciples of Nithyananda have love-failures? You are agitated because your relative boy got into a different way of life (ie., as seen normally)... it is only sheer luck (call it whatever you want) that Nithyananda was exposed in his private domain.
Also, I presume that you have no problems with the relative boy going into saynasam or whatever... if it is under a guru whom you revere. Please correct me if I am wrong.
So now saysasam has to become commercial - a sanyasi should hold a certificate which validates his sanyasam? Probably detailing the place, the guru etc and the date on which he became a sanyasi? Then perhaps, we should initially take a massive undertaking as to identify true sanyasis who then, become eligible to confer sanyasam to others. But then, there comes the problem - who can identify such sanyasis - people like us who have a totally different mindset?
Regards,
Definitely we have to brain wash the boy to save him from fraudulent God men.
If my relative boy wants to take sanyas, let him do it in a traditional mutts like Kanchi, Sringeri etc. We have no problem. Nobody can prevent his destiny.
Getting sanyas from traditional mutts like Kanchi, Sringeri, Vaishanvite and Madhva mutts is not easy.
My point is all sort of self styled Godman wear saffron, call themselves as sanyasis, indulge in all sorts of activities and offer sanyas to every body who are walking into their premises.
We have to differentiate between conservative, conventional mutts and others.
All the best