R
R. Ramanujan
Guest
i think iyengar's are most into their shell(esp when in their work), secretive, more hippocratic, selfish,showy, extremely conscious of image,extremely practical like enthiren the robot(sometimes overlooking human emotions), hungry for more, take hundreds of things at a time, believe that for moksha u need to get perfect score in 12th(ha ha), 5 out of 10 james bond type, some eat non veg, not that fussy abt inter marriage, more materialistic(thats why more of them at mncs)
whereas iyers are not that selfish, laid back,less showy infact traditional, believe in a simple life, content with what they have, take one thing at a time,more loyal, 9 out of 10 james bond type. strict veg,strict caste marriage, less materialistic etc.
(Saivam and Vaishnavam - existed as 2 distinct religions before a common word “Hindu” borrowed from Persian language was attributed to them collectively.)
plus saivites were traditional while vishnuvaites contemporary broke away in 13th century under ramanuja.
whereas iyers are not that selfish, laid back,less showy infact traditional, believe in a simple life, content with what they have, take one thing at a time,more loyal, 9 out of 10 james bond type. strict veg,strict caste marriage, less materialistic etc.
(Saivam and Vaishnavam - existed as 2 distinct religions before a common word “Hindu” borrowed from Persian language was attributed to them collectively.)
plus saivites were traditional while vishnuvaites contemporary broke away in 13th century under ramanuja.
Last edited: