Dear krishji,
I accept that as a compliment. Thank you.
Why only for the next Iyer girl? Why did you deny this right to the iyer girl already there as DIL? The democracy of the family took one step back perhaps. LOL.
Apart from non-veg items do remember pot. You can not be choosy. You have to give what they demand. A marriage is different things for different people.
Marriages will remain legitimate even if they take place in secret. That is not the point here. Those who proudly declare such marriages as show pieces have no legitimacy to claim them to TB marriages. That is the point. At best it is a kalappadam (கலப்படம்) marriage. And kalappadams are usually not liked by people.
And finally and most importantly--the people who are proud about such iC/IR marriages/monstrocities as well as the TB brides/grooms who take pride in such marriages as an instance that proves their boldness, their freedom, their 'liberal(sic)' outlook etc., are in an insignificant minority. Mostly such instances are in families of those TBs who have settled down in western countries or far away places in north in India. So the saving grace is that for every such IC/IR marriage there are a hundred normal, within the caste, TB marriages do take place. So I am least disturbed when the vociferous few here keep reporting repeatedly about such marriages "in my family" , "in my friend's family", "in a relative's family" etc., I just smile and move on. I am least bothered when those who should are themselves are not. And that should answer your shot at Vaagmiji's Stamp of Approval (VSA) conclusively. LOL.
I close this with this quote from malayalam "ஆனைக்கு மதம் பிடிச்சால் சங்கல கொண்டு கெட்டியிடாம். சங்கலய்க்கு மதம் பிடிச்சால் எந்து செய்யும்?" (rough translation: If an elephant goes mad it can be tied down by a chain. If the chain goes mad what can be done?)
vaagmiji
thank you for your response.
there can hardly be denial of the fact there is kalappadam when vaishnavite brahmin marries a saivite brahmin
who worship different Gods in the manner they desire. When vaishnavite community is small in number, this kind of
compromises are inevitable. Similar is the issue when a brahmin girl unable many times to put up with the demands
of orthodox community in terms of dowry and adherance to strict rituals opts for a NB who cherishes her.
now whether this is desirable or not is another thing.
not coming to terms with it and running away to remote corner of india and living in isolation is no solution.
passing a judgement or condemning it does not help the community much.
the other alternative of staying unmarried which prospect many brahmin boys and girls are facing due to strict
adherence to community norms is a worser option
To take heart only those in other parts of country or westernised types have become like this is not wise. if you look
around in tamilnadu , in every family you will find atleast one boy or girl who has defied the narrow norms and got
married breaking the barriers of sect, subcaste or caste .
in terms of rituals performed in mixed marriages or cuisine or mode of celebration if there are kalappadam , what is
the harm if the marriage itself is kalappadam of two castes to which the boy and girl belong.
as long as the boy and the girl who marry like it, I would be least bothered if the general public does not like it.we
do not live for societys happiness. as long it can tolerate this marriage it is good enough. If the local society is
intolerant we shall choose a society which will put up with it .
by the way the iyer girls family performed some rituals separately at the start of marriage, could be ganapathi
homam. I did not find out. the womenfolk of girls family wore madisar their iyer style and those of my family
vaishnavite style.
style