C
CHANDRU1849
Guest
When society was very conservative, extremely religious and custom oriented, and women were enjoying less freedom, such things were quite common, as such activities were thought to be necessary by earlier generations. Probably, until 1950, almost all smartha brahmin ladies, who were married and home makers, would have been in Madisar. This was almost compulsory. Now, how many married Smartha brahmin ladies of the above category, first of all know, the importance of Madisar, let alone wear.
Changes in the society, economic independence etc. modified the outlook of ladies completely. Ten years ago we could see girls, middle aged women wearing Churidhar, using tuppata. Now how many are using it. Possibly after ten years, women may laugh at some of the practices followed by their counterparts in the earlier generations.
Change are inevitable.
A popular dialogue in K Balachander's controversial film 'ARANGETRAM' comes to my mind:
When reminded the heroine Pramila that pallu was not in order, the reply was 'MARATHU POCHU'. But the character was portrayed differently. This dialogue has nothing to do with the subject discussed.
Changes in the society, economic independence etc. modified the outlook of ladies completely. Ten years ago we could see girls, middle aged women wearing Churidhar, using tuppata. Now how many are using it. Possibly after ten years, women may laugh at some of the practices followed by their counterparts in the earlier generations.
Change are inevitable.
A popular dialogue in K Balachander's controversial film 'ARANGETRAM' comes to my mind:
When reminded the heroine Pramila that pallu was not in order, the reply was 'MARATHU POCHU'. But the character was portrayed differently. This dialogue has nothing to do with the subject discussed.