tks
0
All
The previous thread with last post got closed.
First , my apologies to Dr Renu and anyone if I may have confused & frustrated with my responses - there was no intention other than wanting to be precise in ideas (not in grammar or citations). I do take 100% responsibility for the effect though I hope in larger scheme of things this is all minor since I just another member posting and sharing.
My learning style is not due to faith in any authority including interpretation of our scriptures by even Sri Sankara - my respect for them is only due to understanding and realizing that there is truth and value in understanding for my growth.
In other words reasoning and questioning is my style and that is how I respond often to posts (that may cite a scriptural reference that I value)
I have come to understand that sometimes the understanding takes a lot of unlearning and there are not good answers available in this setting.
Dr Renu is serious and respectful to the scriptures but the responses to a few genuine attempts on my part to explain came across to me as not serious. I do not want to attribute any motive to that other than recognize that and provide that feedback just like I am told I have special knack to confuse people
In a respectful discussions there is no need to attribute negative motive to anyone here. We are just a group of 'chatting icons'
I am not here to claim any expertise. I will offer my thoughts when I can (if I have time) and will challenge citations if used incorrectly in my understanding to promote a thought.
Let the Mannagatti discussions do not stop on my accord - hence reopened this thread.
The previous thread with last post got closed.
First , my apologies to Dr Renu and anyone if I may have confused & frustrated with my responses - there was no intention other than wanting to be precise in ideas (not in grammar or citations). I do take 100% responsibility for the effect though I hope in larger scheme of things this is all minor since I just another member posting and sharing.
My learning style is not due to faith in any authority including interpretation of our scriptures by even Sri Sankara - my respect for them is only due to understanding and realizing that there is truth and value in understanding for my growth.
In other words reasoning and questioning is my style and that is how I respond often to posts (that may cite a scriptural reference that I value)
I have come to understand that sometimes the understanding takes a lot of unlearning and there are not good answers available in this setting.
Dr Renu is serious and respectful to the scriptures but the responses to a few genuine attempts on my part to explain came across to me as not serious. I do not want to attribute any motive to that other than recognize that and provide that feedback just like I am told I have special knack to confuse people
In a respectful discussions there is no need to attribute negative motive to anyone here. We are just a group of 'chatting icons' I am not here to claim any expertise. I will offer my thoughts when I can (if I have time) and will challenge citations if used incorrectly in my understanding to promote a thought.
Let the Mannagatti discussions do not stop on my accord - hence reopened this thread.
eace: 
