shankar,
your post #19 & #24 appears to me to say completely opposite things.
#19, to me, presents traditional and religious reasons, as to why boys must marry within the community. you have implied, as i understand it, that boys will be committing adharma, if they do otherwise.
i respect that, even though i disagree with it. it is not for me or my children.
in post #24, to me, is more in line with my line of thinking overall. that we should move with the times, and find harmony with it.
however, your last statement stumped me. ie that a man can live without a woman, but a woman cannot. where did you get that idea?
sir, both men and women are social creatures, and i think, the desire to mate, is perhaps the strongest emotional and physical desire that we ever will experience.
i would say, that NATURE THEORY would be more along the lines to find partners, than otherwise. for both genders.
thank you.
your post #19 & #24 appears to me to say completely opposite things.
#19, to me, presents traditional and religious reasons, as to why boys must marry within the community. you have implied, as i understand it, that boys will be committing adharma, if they do otherwise.
i respect that, even though i disagree with it. it is not for me or my children.
in post #24, to me, is more in line with my line of thinking overall. that we should move with the times, and find harmony with it.
however, your last statement stumped me. ie that a man can live without a woman, but a woman cannot. where did you get that idea?
sir, both men and women are social creatures, and i think, the desire to mate, is perhaps the strongest emotional and physical desire that we ever will experience.
i would say, that NATURE THEORY would be more along the lines to find partners, than otherwise. for both genders.
thank you.