After reading Shri.Sangom's post no.5 above,I feel sorry for Swami.Prakasananda Saraswathi (aged 82) a learned Scholar and who has written several books on Hinduism and who declined the offer to occupy the SEAT of Sankaracharya of Jyothirmath for his wrong decision to join
RADHEYKRISHNA movement of Jagat Guru Acharya Kripalu Maharaj of JKP.ORG.Hehas been convicted in a USA court to undergo 12 years of
imprisonment(at the age of 82) on the allegations of his foreign disciples(three ladies)that he has been perhaps touching them for a number of years(molestation in legal parlance)Poor swamiji must be thinking of himself as Lord Krishna having leelas with Gopicaas.
Dear Shri Krishnamurthy,
What I write below may already be known to you, in view of your vast experience. Still, just to recapitulate,
The "madhura bhakti" - radhe-krishna ideology, originated from a tantric sect prevalent in the present Orissa-W. Bengal area. that sect is known to history as "sahajeeyas", the vaishnavite counterparts of the Sakta Tantric sect called "choli margis". (Pl. refer
"The tribes and castes of the North-Western Provinces and Oudh, Volume 1
By William Crooke", p. 137, about
Banaaphar.) The famous Jayadeva who composed Gita Govinda and his brother Vopadeva, who, some scholars opine, was the author of Bhagavatam, were both sahajeeyas probably. This cult was banned by one ruler of Kalinga and then they started using coded communication which will be acceptable. In that process they hit upon Krishna & Radha as the divine figureheads based on which they can communicate in a disguised fashion. In order to bolster this programme the brothers wrote the two texts which established Krishna as the Supreme God at a later date, with interpolations in the original gita in the much more accepted Mahabharata.
The Gitagovindam refers to the erotic state of Radha, which belies the belief held by gullible folks that raasaleela is about a baby or child krishna; if so, why should Radha - who is Krishna's aunt, talking of relation between the two - feel so much "viraha" for a baby? Bhagavatam, I am told, goes still further and talks about "mukh rati" - oral sex - as part of raasaleela (but I haven't verified this).
Some very entreprising scribe went one step more and installed Radha as the co-creator of the universe along with Krishna, in the Brahmavaivarta Purana.
"Popular vaiShNava works also refrain from quoting the episodes of rAdhA as described in this purANa. " (
see this)
Many of our neo-gurujis take the name of Krishna for whatever their reasons may be. But the more they think themselves to be Krishna, the more risky it becomes for them to maintain their calm, especially when our womenfolk have an inexplicable attraction to such gurujis and throng their ashrams and lectures. That IMO is the bane of hindu religion today.